Template:Did you know nominations/Symphony, D. 708a (Schubert)

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Allen3 ^talk 16:54, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

Symphony, D. 708a (Schubert)

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

• ... that a directional crisis delayed completion of a Schubert symphony for 191 years?

• Comment: My second DYK. I originally intended to bring D.615 or D.2b into this somehow, but it doesn't quite fit. Anyway those can wait another four or five days! :-D
  Thanks to R8R Gtrs for the hook suggestion, and Gerda Arendt for further improvements.

Created by Double sharp (talk). Self nominated at 14:59, 8 January 2014 (UTC).

• I am afraid this substantial, well written article does not qualify for DYK at the moment because it has no inline citations. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 19:37, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
  • Fixing in progress... Double sharp (talk) 01:34, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
    • ...and  Done. Double sharp (talk) 02:00, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Edited the hook a little on R8R's suggestion. Double sharp (talk) 08:31, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

• Full review needed. BlueMoonset (talk) 04:05, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

Substantial article, now with inline citations. I confess to be not happy with the hook. The crisis doesn't appear in one or the other wording in the article, and not with an inline citation right after the sentence as required. "Schubert work" could be a short piano piece, please mention "symphony". I could reword the hook but we will hear the "independent reviewer" call again, please do it yourself. The free image is great in the article, but says about nothing this size. Schubert perhaps? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:39, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

Hmm...I reworded the article to use this wording and cited it. Better? Double sharp (talk) 03:25, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

yes --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:57, 1 February 2014 (UTC)