Template talk:FreeBSD
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the FreeBSD template. |
|
notable subsytem missed
[edit]There should be a reference to Netgraph in the list of notable subsystems - it is more known than e.g. busdma. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.188.94.125 (talk) 11:19, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
Forgetting DflyBSD?
[edit]Have you guys forgotten about DragonflyBSD? It's one of the major BSDs, and based on FreeBSD! — Preceding unsigned comment added by NuclearWizard (talk • contribs) 19:36, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 5 March 2017
[edit] | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I don't see a need for FreeBSD's template to be protected, there is nothing on the talk page that implies it should be.
Edit requests: Add [PlayStation Vita] and [Nintendo Switch system software 208.87.223.18 (talk) 19:22, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
Not done: From the log, the page was protected due to a request at WP:RFPP. You may use WP:RFPP to request it be unprotected. Vita and Switch are already listed in the template. RudolfRed (talk) 20:29, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
Separate current derivatives from discontinued ones?
[edit]I think it would be nice to sort out the discontinued/historical derivatives from the ones that are still current. I don't know whether the dead ones should still be sub-grouped into open/proprietary or just all lumped together, but either way I think it would be handy for the reader.Nlburgin (talk) 21:50, 11 March 2019 (UTC)