User talk:Based.shqiptar.frompirok

DS notice: Eastern Europe and the Balkans

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in Eastern Europe or the Balkans. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

_signed, Rosguill ^talk 00:11, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

Pursuant to the above, you have now engaged in edit warring at 2001 insurgency in Macedonia. Once your suggested change has been objected to, you are expected to start a discussion on the talk page and make the case for it rather than to reintroduce it. Continued edit warring will result in a loss of editing privileges. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 23:35, 11 December 2022 (UTC)

December 2022

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  _signed, Rosguill ^talk 23:52, 11 December 2022 (UTC)

If you continue to ignore Wikipedia's policy against edit warring after your block expires, you can look forward to being blocked indefinitely. I want to stress that I have no particular opinion about the actual specific content you have repeatedly tried to add to the article, only that the way that you are going about trying to add it is wrong. Once unblocked, you should make your case for the edits on the talk page, and refrain from editing the article itself until a consensus is clear. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 23:53, 11 December 2022 (UTC)

Hello! I'm StephenMacky1. Your recent edit(s) appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been reverted for now. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. StephenMacky1 (talk) 22:00, 16 December 2022 (UTC)

January 2023

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 2014 Macedonian government building attack. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. StephenMacky1 (talk) 22:41, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

The main objective of the ANA was to attack the building which they ultimately did. I do not see the problem with changing the page result to successful which it was. Based.shqiptar.frompirok (talk) 00:45, 8 January 2023 (UTC)

The problem is that other editors have objected to it. In that case, you should try to raise the issue in the article's talk page. Repeatedly including it won't solve the problem and is disruptive. Also you don't have sources about any injuries and the other entry like "Rebels leave the scene" is common sense and unnecessary. Obviously the rebels wouldn't stick around after committing the attack. StephenMacky1 (talk) 01:19, 8 January 2023 (UTC)

February 2023

Hello, I'm Aaron Liu. I noticed that you recently removed content from Battle of Llapushnik without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. The content is very related, and readers would be confused by the lede stating "end of KLA's victor streak" when KLA won. Aaron Liu (talk) 19:23, 25 February 2023 (UTC)

April 2023

Hello, I'm Gugrak. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Battle of Vaikal have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Read WP:MILMOS#INFOBOX. results should not be described as pyrrhic Gugrak (talk) 15:51, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

The term Pyrrhic victory means a victory but with a large amount of casualties for the victor which was the case in the battle. Furthermore the aftermath does not say who won the battle (skanderbeg did) it just says Skanderbeg pleaded for Sultan Mehmed II to release his captured commanders so It doesn't make sense for It to be in the result bar Based.shqiptar.frompirok (talk) 14:57, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

The article doesn't say who won at all. You're adding unsourced information in a way that's specifically deprecated by the MOS Gugrak (talk) 15:22, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Albanian–Venetian War, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. See WP:MILMOS#INFOBOX for why 'Decisive' should not be added to Infobox result parameters Gugrak (talk) 05:22, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

May 2023

Hello, I'm Gugrak. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Battle of Vaikal have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Stop making disruptive edits to info boxes Gugrak (talk) 14:31, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Albanian–Greek Border War for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Albanian–Greek Border War is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Albanian–Greek Border War until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Constantine ✍ 13:50, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

Vandilizing articles

stop adding false info NATO was a peace keeper during the 2001 insurgency in Macedonia and Ukraine gave them helicopters in 1999 not in 2001 and Bulgaria helped them in no way During the battle of Nikuštak sure Nato helped drive away the NLA terrorists out of Nikuštak but thats becouse they refusedg to leave after the battle there is a video of American soldiers eating dinner with NLA insurgents and in the Arachinovo crisis NATO gave the NLA busses to get out of aracinovo they did everything they could to maintain peace they where on no ones side Jesssiemen (talk) 17:00, 18 July 2023 (UTC)

"Peacekeepers" but attacked NLA positions like in Tanuševci and gave Macedonia information about NLA hideouts, the only reason why NATO intervened in Aračinovo was because the Macedonian President Boris Trajkovski wanted a ceasefire because his troops couldn't take Aračinovo from 350 rebels. Based.shqiptar.frompirok (talk) 18:58, 18 July 2023 (UTC)

check any source from 2001 not some source that got created yesterday

nato played a role as a peace keeper they where technically on both sides Ali Ahmeti uploaded a video of him and his soldiers eating with american soldiers and even thanked some american officials for the service these last 2 decades Jesssiemen (talk) 19:34, 18 July 2023 (UTC)

Even if the Mi-24s were given to Macedonia in 1999 it would be impossible for Macedonia to train Their own pilots (Even in Yugoslavia pilots from Macedonia had to go to Serbia, Croatia, Bosnia or Slovenia to train). In one of my sources it literally says "Two Mi-24 helicopters flown by Ukrainian pilots ... blasted the hillside [above Tetovo] with rockets' The helicopters [were] a gift from Ukraine" In this source it clearly states Ukrainian pilots flew in Mi-24 and saying im vandalizing even though im giving reliable sources is nonsense. Based.shqiptar.frompirok (talk) 19:16, 18 July 2023 (UTC)

after the battle of arachinovo nato gave busses to the NLA nato helped the NLA to and they didnt attack anything in tanusevci the NLA attacked them witch resulted in KFOR fighting back Jesssiemen (talk) 19:29, 18 July 2023 (UTC)

"After the battle of Aračinovo" You're making it sound like Macedonia won the battle and NATO came and saved the NLA (What most Macedonian nastionalist say on apps like TikTok) The Aračinovo crisis was a failed military operation by Macedonia, Boris Trajkovski saw the operation would lead to a failure so he asked NATO to mandate a ceasefire which would give Aračinovo to Macedonian forces (with supervision from OSCE) and give safe passage to NLA rebels who had to leave and the Tanuševci operation was a joint military operation by KFOR (NATO) and Macedonia which itself proves that NATO was indeed on the side of Macedonia and not neutral like you say. Based.shqiptar.frompirok (talk) 20:17, 18 July 2023 (UTC)

I've done more reading on this subject and I come to the understanding that you are correct Jesssiemen (talk) 00:40, 19 July 2023 (UTC)

why are you removing the Karadak Front and those [[ ]]? Jesssiemen (talk) 21:24, 19 July 2023 (UTC)

I remove [[ ]] because there isn't a page made/published yet about it and it makes the page look bad and unfinished. Based.shqiptar.frompirok (talk) 21:26, 19 July 2023 (UTC)

those make editing those articles easier if some page creators create on mobile

But still why do youv remove the Karadak Front? Jesssiemen (talk) 23:15, 19 July 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Anglo–American invasion of Communist Albania for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anglo–American invasion of Communist Albania is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anglo–American invasion of Communist Albania until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

StephenMacky1 (talk) 11:26, 8 August 2023 (UTC)

October 2023

Hi Based.shqiptar.frompirok! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at 1950 Albanian coastline ambushes that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 15:54, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Vlora incident. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. StephenMacky1 (talk) 20:49, 16 October 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on Serbian campaign (1915)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Serbian campaign (1915), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 18:36, 17 October 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:2014 Siege of Lazarat

Hello, Based.shqiptar.frompirok. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:2014 Siege of Lazarat, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:07, 27 October 2023 (UTC)

An Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard discussion is up about you

==Notice of noticeboard discussion==

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.) Rijekaneretva (talk) 09:11, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Based.shqiptar.frompirok. Thank you for your work on Liberation of Tepelena. User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 21:50, 11 December 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2001 insurgency in Macedonia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National Liberation Army. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 21 December 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Battle of Vranina

Hello, Based.shqiptar.frompirok. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Battle of Vranina, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:05, 25 December 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Based.shqiptar.frompirok. Thank you for your work on Battle of Orizare. Scope creep, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Great wee article. I really enjoyed reading it.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Scope creep}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

scope_creepTalk 09:46, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

Ways to improve Persecution of Romani people during the Kosovo War

Hello, Based.shqiptar.frompirok,

Thank you for creating Persecution of Romani people during the Kosovo War.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

This article takes some reports of deaths and displacements and presents them as a systematic persecution. It also claims that 50,000 people were “expelled”, which is not supported by the sources.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mccapra}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Mccapra (talk) 04:40, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

Persecution of Romani people during the Kosovo War moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Persecution of Romani people during the Kosovo War, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 03:01, 19 January 2024 (UTC)

If you look at the edit history, you can see that most of the material was removed by other users. Based.shqiptar.frompirok (talk) 11:35, 19 January 2024 (UTC)

Mehmet Gradica moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Mehmet Gradica, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) The best sources are published books or scholarly papers - the sources for this article all seem to be blog sites, political sites and other non-neutral websites. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 20:40, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Battle of Vranina

Hello, Based.shqiptar.frompirok. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Battle of Vranina".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Schminnte ^{[talk to me]} 21:22, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Battle of Bukovac

Hello, Based.shqiptar.frompirok. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Battle of Bukovac, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:03, 14 March 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Zhegoc offensive

Hello, Based.shqiptar.frompirok. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Zhegoc offensive, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:05, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Zhegoc offensive

Hello, Based.shqiptar.frompirok. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Zhegoc offensive".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:05, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 10

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Llapusha-South Drenica Front, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Yugoslav Army.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Persecution of Romani people during the Kosovo War

Hello, Based.shqiptar.frompirok. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Persecution of Romani people during the Kosovo War, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:05, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Mehmet Gradica

Hello, Based.shqiptar.frompirok. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mehmet Gradica, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:07, 25 June 2024 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Persecution of Romani people during the Kosovo War

Hello, Based.shqiptar.frompirok. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Persecution of Romani people during the Kosovo War".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:52, 19 July 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Attack on Prekaz (1991)

A tag has been placed on Attack on Prekaz (1991) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. C F A 💬 15:18, 29 August 2024 (UTC)

Ways to improve Graštica Ambushes

Hello, Based.shqiptar.frompirok,

Thank you for creating Graštica Ambushes.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Ref 8 to 18 are damaged reference with journal entry. The reason is not a peer reviewed article. It is effectively WP:SPS source.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Scope creep}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

scope_creepTalk 12:01, 2 September 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Perati Bridge attack for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Perati Bridge attack is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Perati Bridge attack until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Constantine ✍ 18:54, 28 October 2024 (UTC)