User talk:Bellerophon5685

Flash Gordon

I think I have the film section organized in the way that you suggested. I hope that helps. IrishGuy 22:35, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

		The Barnstar of High Culture
		For your hard work in improving the Tristan and Iseult articles, I award you this Barnstar of High Culture. Cúchullain ^t/c 05:45, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

(Another) Barnstar

I see Cuchullain has given you one already...but I hope you don't mind another one :).

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		For your continuous dedications in expanding the Tristan and Tristan and Iseult pages! --Stoa 16:29, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hyper-Calvinism

I deleted the external link you added to Hyper-Calvinism because that page is not only not hyper-Calvinist, but is in fact anti-Calvinist. --Flex 12:54, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Films/mythology sub-cat

Greetings Dudeman! Since you obviously have worked hard on this article, you may want to know that there's a new sub-cat under Category:Films by source, which is Category:Films based on Greco-Roman mythology. Cheers, ♥ Her Pegship♥ 18:26, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Film serials

Hey Dude! Actually, I tend to lurk about the film/book categories and tidy them up periodically, and I saw the article under Category:Film. The Filmms WikiProject is quite lively here and you can find some useful stuff in these spots:

Wikipedia:WikiProject Films and its sub-projects
Category:Film templates
Wikipedia:Naming conventions (films)
Template:Infobox Film

Also, I know that Lady Aleena has been active in compiling lists of contemporary film series, so you might pick her brain about what resources she likes. Go to it, and I'll keep lurking...Cheers! ♥ Her Pegship♥ 03:56, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Dudeman...so, let's get to work here.

The list should be in chronological order earliest to latest, so it needs to be flipped. Not an easy task I know.
As you are grouping the serials by production company, there needs to be headings under each of the years for them. Also, they should not be in all caps. I could fix the all caps quickly, if you wish.
More information may be needed, such as how many films were in each serial.
Once we get this tidied, getting it noticed will be next. Let's tidy it up first. Sound good?

LA @ 03:45, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dudeman...I am working on it here. It is slow going, but I got the years flipped, now I am trying to alphabetalize the serials within each year. After giving each production company their own headings, it became unweildy, so I came up with what is in years 1912-1916. Let me know what you think. - LA @ 05:43, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

List of films made in the Third Reich

Some movies on List of films made in the Third Reich have links that point to subjects of the film, not an article on it (examples: Amphitryon, Mazurka, etc.). Would it not be better to reference any interesting tidbits in the Notes column. As it stands it would seem that the links take you to an article on the movie. --Swift 08:49, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

[The following comment moved here from User:Swift]

I was actually trying to do that to Kurt Gerrons "Theresenstadt" - It links to the Concentration Camp article, but I was trying to get it to link specifically to the part about the Camps use as a propaganda tool. (A really disturbing story BTW) Also - I know there is a rule against posting commecial links in the External Links sections, except when there is special content? I was thinking of adding links to Internatinal Historic videos because they do have useful info on my subjects.--Dudeman5685 16:39, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I sort of figured you were (history shows you linking ot the section. What I was suggesting that such links to topic were done in the "Notes" column of the tables.

I've seen commercial links in "External links" sections. If you do so tactfully, no-one might object. Be bold. If you use the video as a reference, you can cite it. Useful pages: Category:Citation templates and Wikipedia:Footnotes for useful material.

Final note: if you check your contributions, there are many edits spaced very closely in time. This clogs up the history pages[1][2] and makes changes hard to follow. You may like to use the Show preview button, on the right of the Save page button to check intermediate edits. --Swift 19:31, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but I only now noticed the comment you left on my userpage on the 26th. Comments and questions are better left on the talk page as users get notified of those. Also, it would really help with page histories if you were to use the "Show preview" button rather than save after every little edit. --Swift 03:54, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Show preview

As I've mentioned to you a couple of times, it would greatly help if you were to use the "Show preview" button when doing multiple edits. You should also consider entering edit summaries in the field beside the "Save" and "Show preview" buttons. If you have any questions how or why to use these features, I'd be more than willing to help. --Swift 00:19, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Political parties in Europe

Hi. Wouldn't you say that creating a Category:Political parties by country in Europe instead of just "in Europe", and functioning as a subcategory of Category:Political parties by country, would have been a better solution? Dahn 20:42, 28 September 2006 (UTC) I had always meant this to be a sub-cat of Political Parties by Country. If you think it should be Category:Political parties by country in Europe then fill free to rename it, only wait till I'm through filling it out a bit.--Dudeman5685 20:43, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Nazi Party Organisations

Hi Dudeman5685. I see you created this category. I noticed that German Labour Front is now in both

This seems a bit redundant to me. Is there an appreciable difference between these two categories? --Bookandcoffee 17:49, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Western Somali Liberation Front

Why is this page tagged: Category|Anti-communism ? Were supported by Communist/Socialist countries! RCEberwein 13:49, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Estonian anti-German resistance movement 1941-1944

Hi, Dudeman5685. You made last edit in article Estonian anti-German resistance movement 1941-1944, and thats why I ask you. In this article link Erik Paulson is wrong: it is about modern trainer, not about WW2 resistance figure. Could you change it (disambig)? I can't, my english is very poor. Thanks --217.150.40.230 12:35, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

NFB wartime films

Hi. I didn't realize that CineRoute was just for Canadians -- I know that access is limited to "NFB Film Club" members, or actually a small subsection thereof. But I can tell you that the available films are not for download, just streaming. My colleagues were very clear on this. Unfortunately, I've never worked with any of the NFB WWII propaganda titles -- even the Oscar-winner Churchill's Island. I've never actually seen it, though of course I've heard about. So I don't have access to any DVD that I could copy a file from and email. In fact, I've never heard of these films being telecast in their entirety Canada during my 17 years at the Board. I'm afraid the clips that are online at the NFB site is the best I can do. Sorry. Shawn in Montreal 19:33, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"The Campaign in Poland"

You are more than welcome. And if, in return, you discover any other Nazi propaganda videos on the Net (ideally with English narration or titles) do me a favor and let me know. Vidor 22:53, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

vandal

uh, is ???????????????This Wikipedia user likes to keep people guessing??????????????? vandalism? It seems kinda odd --science4sail ^talk con 02:34, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

List of Holocaust films

The "a" isn't necessary; it just makes it easier to edit. Article pages should be designed for the readers, not the editors. Most people, myself included, would be confused by the a in the section headers. They should be removed. --dm ^(talk) 19:52, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I object to the small note. Section headers should be clear and self-explanatory. The article should be written so that they're easy for readers to use and understand, not for your own convenience. It's not that difficult to edit the whole page instead of a single section. --dm ^(talk) 20:55, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The 'a' is not minuscule. It's 1/6th of the header. Where would the note be? Because there are 7 subsections and a table of contents where the a's appear. I'm afraid you'd be making a typographically ugly page even uglier. --dm ^(talk) 21:03, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see how ==1950s(doc)== would be an improvement. There's nothing conventional about that. --dm ^(talk) 21:10, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Article for Deletion Revolutionary Anarchist Bowling League

You have contributed as an editor to the article above. It is being considered for deletion. You can comment on this here.

Also it would be helpful if someone could provide a cite to the Minneapolis Star Tribune or other major media cite for the 1988 "bowling ball" incident discussed in the article.Edivorce 03:58, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for adding to the list of bulgarian films feel free to add the rest and add in the bulgarian titles too. Thanks dude!! Ernst Stavro Blofeld 19:24, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No I want to keep Polish films on one list e.g List of Polish films -as the list growns it can be paged off into the ones you suggested smaller time periods -its easier to keep track of everything that way Ernst Stavro Blofeld 19:47, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

List of World War II films

Can you please explain your edits to this article on January 20? After I had removed all the calls to the flagIOC template (which results in links to articles like Italy at the 1936 Summer Olympics, you put them back in! What was the point of that? Please use the flagcountry template, which is far more appropriate for this article. Andrwsc 18:48, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've already fixed it. The {{flagicon}} and {{flagcountry}} templates are designed for normal use. {{flagIOC}} is specific for Olympic articles, because of the wikilinks it produces. In this case, there was always an "Italy old" flag to get what you wanted. Andrwsc 01:33, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

HI. I see you have done a terrific job on the list of Pre 1945 German films. It would be an enormous help if you could fill in the List of West German films and List of East German films 1945-1989. THanks. Keep up the great wikiing I'm impressed

Here is the link for West German films

http://www.imdb.com/Sections/Countries/WestGermany/

♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^{"I've been expecting you"} 17:09, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please could you continue from 1961 on List of East German films -it looks a little odd that it couts off abruptly!! I am been adding a few West german films ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^{"Expecting you" "SPECTRE"} 12:22, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi and thank you for your help in the country lists. There is a discussion curently in Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Films/List and navigation management to try to define what entries are needed in the lists and which we could try to filter out. This problem has some history and it's worth a collective decision. Some lists are very concise (maybe too concise -see List of Greek films) and others start becoming very long. The main point however is that they should be useful and usable, so any opinions are very welcome at this point. Hoverfish Talk 08:42, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I know you are one busy bunny but if you could complete the DDR 1960-1989 this would be terrific. Leave out TV films though. I am curentlY completing Argentina, will do West germany if Hoverfish doesn't get there first soon. Saludos! ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^{"Expecting you" "S.P.E.C.T.R.E"} 16:14, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think each one of us should be absolutely free to decide what he/she wants to edit, which IMO is the most terrific point about contributing to Wikipedia. I am just trying to make sure everyone agrees in some general lines, but we'll get there too. So enjoy your editis and we'll have a full series of great films-by-country lists soon. Hoverfish Talk 06:12, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

One more request for your opinion: should we somehow contain the 1945-1949 period in a section of its own? It obviously doesn't belong to East or West, but it's too little to get a page of its own. On the other hand it would be redundant to add it to both of the East and West articles (but maybe more correct). Also I did some fixes in all the lead sections of the all German lists to be more in conformity with each other. If you see any mistake, please feel free to correct it, or to let me know. Hoverfish Talk 08:48, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject King Arthur

Hey! Just noticed your past interest in King Arthur and wanted to invite you to join WikiProject King Arthur. Just add your name to the list of members in order to join. Basically, we are just grouping together to improve and organize wikiarticles about King Arthur, past and present. Wrad 20:28, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding edits to Mein Kampf

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, Dudeman5685! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the link you added, matching rule \bangelfire\.com\/, is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links policy for more information. If the link was to an image, please read Wikipedia's image tutorial on how to use a more appropriate method to insert the image into an article. If your link was intended to promote a site you own, are affiliated with, or will make money from inclusion in Wikipedia, please note that inserting spam into Wikipedia is against policy. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! Shadowbot 19:33, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Theozoology link

Hello. You've added external links for the Lanz von Liebenfels book in a couple of articles, are you sure the subtitle is correctly translated? "Lore of the Sodom-Apelings and the Electron of the Gods" is how it's rendered in Goodrick-Clarke and a fair number of other places. My German is elementary, but it looks more accurate to me. The name Sodom has wider connotations than "sodomite"; and "Divine" is probably too vague (it could imply a monotheistic concept, but Götter means "gods'", as in Götterdämmerung). Just want to get it right; hope I'm not being pedantic. Gnostrat 22:30, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding edits to National Republican Party (United States)

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, Dudeman5685! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the link you added, matching rule \bexample\.com, is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links guidelines for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! Shadowbot 00:26, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fahrenheit 9/11 as a propoganda film

Just stumbled on your exchanges in the Talk:Fahrenheit 9/11 page. You are absolutely right that it should be in the propoganda film category, and I am amazed that this is even debateable. I guess that some people are so conditioned to think that propoganda=bad, that they refuse to admit this is an obvious propoganda film. Keep up the fight.Plazak 18:49, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The external link on On the Jews and Their Lies

Hey Dude! I downloaded the pdf that you linked to on On the Jews and Their Lies. It is helpful, but it is not the complete English translation of the work. It is the version that is reprinted by the Liberty Bell Publications that we are talking about on the bottom of the talk page. Thanks for finding it!--Drboisclair 18:40, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Freedom Comes High

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Freedom Comes High, by Propaniac, another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Freedom Comes High fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:

Does not assert notability.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Freedom Comes High, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Freedom Comes High itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 19:02, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar of Diligence

		The Barnstar of Diligence
		For your watchfulness and concern to serve Wikipedia to its highest standards I award you this barnstar. Wear it with distinction! Drboisclair 10:22, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fahrenheit 9/11

Look at the propaganda argument. I honestly don't understand how it is even up for debate. But then again many take propaganda to be a negative term. Arcade123 08:22, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding edits made during August 3 2007 (UTC) to Paris Hilton

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although we invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, at least one of your recent edits was not constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ¤~Persian Poet Gal ^(talk) 21:36, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I'm as by the book as they come :P...I've never done anything wild or against the rules on this website...but in real life, that's another story!¤~Persian Poet Gal ^(talk) 21:48, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Socialist and Social Democratic parties of Germany

Category:Socialist and Social Democratic parties of Germany, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. –

CfD nomination of Category:Far-right and fascist parties of Germany

Category:Far-right and fascist parties of Germany, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. –

CfD nomination of Category:Conservative and Christian Democratic parties of Germany

Category:Conservative and Christian Democratic parties of Germany, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. –

Canuck WWII films

You're most welcome. I wanted to let you know that there is a major new NFB site underway that will feature lots more content. I'll let you know when it's live and we can figure out how best to link to it. A colleague of mine is working on it right now, should be live in early 2008, if all goes well. Regards, Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:06, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Hello Dudeman5685. Thank you for kind words and all :)

So, regarding the imperialism of the Soviet Union, what can I say. We were wrong (about the Communism), and we made half of the world to follow our false beliefs. But there's a problem how to comprehend that. Soviet Union and the modern Russia are completely different entities: SU was an ideologized empire, Russia is a usual selfish shit. Say this not to disclaim responsibility -- but you really can't understand policies of the SU from today positions. That was simply irrational and silly. We wasted our own resources to supply the allies, while since 60s Soviet Union wasn't able to produce enough grain to feed its own population. Well, that imperialism could mean something for the SU -- like, to spread Communism, to counter American imperialism :), but that's empty speech now (since 1990).

Definitely, I don't see anything to be proud about that. The only thing I actually feel sorry for are the wasted lives. No lives should be wasted for mere ideas.

Perhaps I didn't make my answer clear -- but I don't really remember Soviet Union (I'm 21) and I didn't discuss that a lot.

There's also a point that if you reflect on the history of the Soviet Union, it has much more tragic pages to worry about than the soviet imperialism.

Perhaps there's also some broader question -- is messing with other countries' affairs ever justified? I believe there's no universal answer, but the one which seems to be natural here is a definite no. Just because other countries have their own brains to live on. Just because we were wrong once, and how can you ever be sure you bring good, how can you be sure you'll be thanked after that not disdained? Better to say, how can you accept responsibility for others?

Of course, this position if you look from the other side is simple egotism. And imho while there's a hope for an individual person to remain good and all, that's different for countries. Russia a selfish shit is a true position. That's a little bit depressing, but first of all you have to settle all your problems, and then you'll have no time to worry about others.

Perhaps you have different views about american imperialism, because of, yes, South Korea, Japan, Germany. That worked, and that may encourage you for further deeds.

Cheers!

ellol (talk) 19:20, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

--

Perhaps I haven't again made it clear. You had a cold war question, while I better focus on the today agenda. Indeed, as Russia and the US are no more enemies, there are global problems to face. The third world, which due to the poverty will be a major source of instability in the following say 200 years. Nuclear armaments, which are yet "ready" as in the worst cold war years. Indeed, if say some Aliens would like to inflame the nuclear war, all they need is to explode a bomb over Moscow and one over Washington, all the rest we will do ourself on the timescale of minutes.

We really are no more enemies, although there are some quite untidy moments. (Like, I live just several kilometers from the Second Ring of the Moscow ABM system -- and I would be glad if it never had to be set in action.) And how to live on is a big question. Something called real politics. ellol (talk) 20:15, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

---

Well, theoretically American imperialism was about spreading freedom and democracy and countering the Communism. Today in Russia we have people who justify it all, like claim it's of no importance what's happened with Hiroshima and Nagasaki -- but it's great what's the Japan has today come to (said Valeria Novodvorskaya).

Lol. There was recently an article of a girl who's visited Afghanistan a year ago. [3] Lemme translate a bit... I got the answer to the question -- why we, the former enemies, are yet loved in Afghanistan? -- from a usual person named Ahmad in a guest house in a little city Puli-Humri. A man of the waning generation, yet somewhat speaking Russian but already better or worse speaking English explained it easily: "You fought with courage, you killed us, and then sat with us at one table and drank vodka. You never disdained us. When I come to an American here in Afghanistan, first of all he points an automated gun on me. He both fears and contempts me. He would never drink with me nor share bread with me. Because for him I'm an inferior being. And Russian was a brother. Even when he killed."

If you want to explore your knowledge about Russia -- I can only encourage you. That wouldn't be any shocking knowledge -- I mean, your ideas won't be shattered as Russian society today has accepted ideas of market economy and democracy -- but you will enrich youself, that's all...

Btw, if you really want to show your esteem -- may I know your real name? :) That's of no real importance, of course, but better to speak with somebody, not a complete anonymous :) ellol (talk) 01:27, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

-- Hello again.

I'm sorry -- now that is overuse of your hospitality.

But if your global question was of the existence of the Alternative -- there are a couple of my words.

On the scale of societies, there indeed is no alternative to capitalism and market economy. Socialism just doesn't work in XXI conditions. If you track the economic history of SU you'll see that yourself -- signs of the coming decay can be seen since 1960s. Although that's only my view. 11% of Russians think differently -- I mean those who'd recently vote for the Communist Party of the Russian Federation.

But what encourages in that although no alternative for societies can be seen, there's yet a vast field of alternatives for an individual person. And now the number of alternatives is in fact even higher than in the Soviet Union -- that's my answer for the same question. If that was not your question -- sorry. Anyway, now I'll no more disturb you :). ellol (talk) 17:23, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

re: cold war question

Hello, Dudeman5685. Thank you. I better address you by nick, yes?

No, you are mistaken, I'm a male. Ellol is just a convenient nick, my name is Evgeny V. Filatov, in fact it's on my user page. Russian girls are indeer very beautiful, but i'm a Russian guy :)

I understand your question. Right now unfortunately I have no time to investigate for certain politician's speeches and so. Will try to do that after a while. Rudely speaking, spectrum of Russian political thought is placed between two poles -- liberals and patriots. Liberals (Valeria Novodvorskaya, Yevgeniya Albats, Shenderovich, etc.) indeed believe Soviet Union did everything wrong. They resist attempts of streightening Russian statehood, mostly they are in opposition to the current regime, and they totally ignore views of ordinary citizens. Like, if the nation supports the regime they see as antidemocratic, this merely speaks about lameness of the nation. This partially explains their little support among the people. Of course it's also that they have less access to the most influential mass media, than in 90s. But on the other hand, there's no way the regime can cut out speech freedom without evoking another civil war. So there's a way of a dynamic equilibrium.

Patriots (I don't even know -- Oleg Kashin perhaps?, Valery Tretyakov, others) see the Soviet Union as a part of our history.

Perhaps liberals feel guilt for Soviet imperialism -- if those guys can ever feel guilt. At least they think Russian people should feel guilt. I guess patriots only feel it was a waste of resources.

Perhaps you would be interested in some excerpts from Barsenkov & Vdovin "History of Russia. 1917-2004.", the textbook accepted at the Historical faculty of the Moscow State University. Pieces from it regarding foreign policy of Soviet Union in respect of Third World Countries:

"Thaw", 1953-1964

page 502: Soviet Union paid much attention towards development of relationships with "third world" countries -- India, Indonesia, Birma, Afghanistan etc. They were aided with building of large national-economy objects (metallurgical complex in India, Aswan Dam in Egypt, etc). In 1953-1964 over 6,000 enterprises were built in various countries with financial and technician aid of USSR.

Early "Developed Socialism", 1964-1977

page 517: Relationships with "third world" countries in the period of early 'developed socialism' in Soviet Union were determined by its yearning to gain new allies and set up mutually beneficial cooperation with them. Soviet Union performed at the side of Egypt and Syria in Seven-Day War (!) with Israel in June 1967, it favoured calming the other military outburst in the Middle East in Autumn 1973, it supported India in its conflicts with Pakistan in the middle of 60-s and in 1971. The priority in relationships with developing countries was given to countries of 'socialistic direction' (Cambodia, Laos, Somali, Angola, Mozambique, Nicaragua). They received economical and military aid, sometimes amounting to milliards dollars. Military blocks logics of USSR lead in foreign policy to establishing allied ties also with dictatorship regimes (Iraq, Syria, Lybia, Ethiopia). Equally the same politics was carried by USA, which supported utterly reactional regimes of anticommunist and antisoviet orientation.

Later "Developed Socialism", 1977-1985

page 538: [on discussing arms race unbearable for Soviet economics] The aid for developing countries was becoming other 'source of bankruptcy' of USSR . In the end of 70s USSR was bound with diplomatic ties with over 130s states, more then a half of them the developing ones. Striving to expand its influence Soviet Union sent for a work in those countries its military and civilian experts, provided enormous priveleged long-term credits, carried shipments of cheap armaments and raw material. If in 1955-1968 shipments of armaments to 'brother regimes' constituted a sum of 4.5 milliard dollars, and 9,2 mlrd dollars in 1966-1975, it was already 35.4 mlrd dollars in 1978-1982. USSR spent a lot for educating numerous foreign students and postgraduates. However effectiency of the help turned out to be inessential, credits in most cases were not returned.

Doesn't lack of patriotism, right?

In fact as you can see, relationships with third-world countries are not a much popular theme.

Unfortunately for now I can't provide a more comprehensive answer, just due to the lack of time. If you are interested, I'll try to return to the topic after about a week when I get more free.

P.s. That's all very interesting, but man my major is physics after all! :) ellol (talk) 15:49, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

-- The situation with so-called liberals is in fact easy. If in the U.S. combination of liberal democratic ideas and American patriotism leads to overwhelming victory, in Russia the combination of liberal democratic ideas and American patriotism leads to a political failure.

I don't explain position of Russian patriots -- I guess patriotism is nearly the same in every country. Perhaps of Russian patriots you can see Mikhail Leontyev and Gleb Pavlovsky -- they are bright figures.

However liberals and patriots only define utter points of a political battlefield, although I would say today its patriots who rule the game.

Well, the topic of Soviet imperialism of course extends far more than third-world countries -- mostly meaning countries of 'socialistic block'. But it may need books to describe it adequately... also given that it's also often a painful question for the parties involved. ellol (talk) 22:54, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo

Hi, do you know this: http://futurezone.orf.at/it/stories/249250/ - bad, bad Boy :-))) -- 80.121.4.245 (talk) 08:50, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:US far left magazines

I have nominated Category:US far left magazines (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. скоморохъ 13:52, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:US far left magazines

Category:US far left magazines, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. – Cgingold (talk) 14:39, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Inuit Circumpolar Conference

What on earth was that supposed to be? CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 23:39, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just because it's 1 April does not mean you need to start adding links to stupid hoaxes. It's nothing more than vandalism. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 23:53, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Cops (SEAN BELL)

You should try this website NYPD DATABASE Ron John (talk) 07:34, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dr. No Triad link

I've removed the thing you put into the Triad article about Dr. No. A quick google reveals that Flemming's book was published by a company called "Triad", but I can't find anything confirming that Dr. No was ex-Triad (although I must admit, it's been several years since I have seen the film). Feel free to put it back in if you have a reference. -- Mark Chovain 04:58, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

We can't include it, actually. It would be original research. The only way it can be included is if a reliable source has published something to that effect. -- Mark Chovain 08:26, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Crippled Eagles

Interesting bit of history you managed to find. I took a moment to tweak the style, add a couple of wikis and correct a spelling error. Nice work. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 16:45, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You bet. Looking forward to seeing this expand. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 18:11, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Elections in Weimar Hamberg

A tag has been placed on Elections in Weimar Hamberg, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from an implausible typo.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you believe that there is a reason to keep the redirect, you can request that administrators wait a while before deleting it. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Sebastian scha. (talk) 16:42, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lantag Elections in Weimar Hamburg

A tag has been placed on Lantag Elections in Weimar Hamburg, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from an implausible typo.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you believe that there is a reason to keep the redirect, you can request that administrators wait a while before deleting it. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Sebastian scha. (talk) 16:42, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hamburg Lantag Elections in the WeimarRepublic

A tag has been placed on Hamburg Lantag Elections in the WeimarRepublic, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from an implausible typo.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you believe that there is a reason to keep the redirect, you can request that administrators wait a while before deleting it. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Sebastian scha. (talk) 16:42, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

speedy del and question of source

Hi there, after the formal stuff ;-) I've got a question, what are your sources for the numbers? The article is now called Hamburg Landtag Elections in the Weimar Republic but I'm not sure if it should not be moved to Hamburg state elections in the Weimar Republic. Thank you Sebastian scha. (talk) 16:42, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No content in Category:Baden/Wurttemburg Elections

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Category:Baden/Wurttemburg Elections, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Category:Baden/Wurttemburg Elections has been empty for at least four days, and its only content has been links to parent categories. (CSD C1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Category:Baden/Wurttemburg Elections, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 19:11, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Slave rebellions

Thanks for your note. I'm glad you like it. I just fixed the formatting. — Malik Shabazz (talk · contribs) 04:43, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"The Bund on Wikipedia" Project

Hello,

I am writing to you today asking if you are interested in "The Bund on Wikipedia" Project. http://bundwiki.weebly.com/index.html I thought you might be interested because I saw that you edited the page for the General Jewish Labour Union. You can reply here, my talk page, or at eliscoming@aol.com. Thanks.--Eliscoming1234 (talk) 19:13, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"The Bund on Wikipedia" Project Task Force

--Eliscoming1234 (talk) 03:40, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ANI

Your edits have been brought up in an ANI discussion here.Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Point.3F--Cube lurker (talk) 16:16, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Federal districts

If you want to change the table layout so the list is to the side of the map, I have no reason to object whatsoever :) However, both the map and the list under it fit just fine on one screen for most people, so I guess I don't quite understand what the problem seems to be. Cheers,—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 14:00, November 2, 2009 (UTC)

Ruthenberg

The "Fighter" pamphlet seems to be an extract from Voices of Revolt. Play it like you wanna. Your pal, tim Carrite (talk) 23:45, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. Please accept the glorious WORKERS' BARNSTAR as a token of appreciation!

DYK for Fascist League of North America

On December 3, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Fascist League of North America, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page _{(here's how)} and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

So Why 20:47, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Christopher Phelps

The subject of the article has reverted the addition of his run for the U.S. Senate as a Socialist twice more within 24 hours without discussion. To offer input and for details, please see the article's talk page. -- btphelps ^{(talk) (contribs)} 20:31, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: ANI query

Hi, saw your query on WP:ANI. Put the cats in "noinclude" tags. E.g.:

[[Category:Diaspora templates]]

</noinclude>

Make sure the "noinclude" tag is directly after the end of the template, on the same line. E.g. what I did in this edit. Cheers, cab (talk) 02:26, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It takes a while for template updates to get through the job queue. In the mean time the articles will still show up in the Category:Diaspora templates. The articles themselves Swedish American and Swedish Australian don't show the category anymore. Cheers cab (talk) 03:33, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Have another!

For your super-swell writing of bibliographies and tracking down of links to pdf documents... My hero! Drop me a line sometime... MutantPop@aol.com Carrite (talk) 06:49, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Archive.org

Nice on the Socialist World...

If you're affiliated with Archive.org, I've got probably 1000 (or more, I've totally lost count) pdf documents up on my site ( http://www.marxisthistory.org ). Not all of them are 100% indisputably copyright clear according to the most conservative interpretation of copyright law, amen, but the overwhelming majority are clear beyond a shadow of a doubt under any interpretation... I ran a search and notice that something like 90 documents have already migrated to Archive.org, which is great. I'd like to strongly encourage you to harvest away at them, if that appeals to you. Many of them have made their way to Marxists Internet Archive already, but nothing is forever in cyberspace and having them up in parallel at Archive.org would be a very good thing, methinks. MIA is a small group and I'm just me, so having things up several times in several places is all for the good... Virtually all are machine readable PDFs. Carrite (talk) 18:10, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wanna Have Yourself a PDF Booklinkin' Extravaganza?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scott_Nearing

Carrite (talk) 00:45, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your opinion needed

There seems to be a serious disagreement shaping up at Talk:International Socialist Review and hearing your views on the topic at hand would be appreciated. It's pretty simple stuff, relating to whether a page should have its content divided and be converted into a disambiguation page. Best regards. —Tim Carrite (talk) 15:49, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Official songs of US Territories

You rock!

		Home-Made Barnstar
		For your handcrafting a pdf of the Fraina "Trial" Stenogram, a handcrafted barnstar! Carrite (talk) 15:07, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Left Wing National Conference

I don't recall having ever seen a complete list of attendees to the June 1919 Left Wing National Conference.

There are links on my website to: 1. Conference call; 2. Revised Left Wing Manifesto passed by the conference; 3. Minutes of gathering; 4. Fraina account of conference; 5. Stenographic extract of speeches. You are, of course, welcome to upload any of these things to Archive.org if you haven't already and to link up. If you would rather I do that, say the word. Page of my site with the links is: http://www.marxisthistory.org/subject/usa/eam/socialistparty.html

The Horowitz minutes can be milked for an attendees list; as far as I know, no complete list was ever published though. Drop me a straight email if you wanna: MutantPop@aol.com —Tim. Carrite (talk) 02:30, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It just occurred to me that maybe the Russian Federation's Novyi Mir has coverage of the conference — the film runs through July 1919. I'll spin it and check it out if you want me to. I've got the Ukrainian Federation's Robitnyk film on order, but it will be a while and it seems to me that the feds shut that publication down in 1918 anyway... I've got Työmies for the period, too, but I don't think the Finns attended. The only Volkszeitung I have so far starts 9/1/19, unfortunately. Carrite (talk) 02:36, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

BTW, read most of the Fraina Trial thing at work today. Interesting takeaway for me was that the CPA went underground in New York after the Nov. 7, 1919, Lusk raid, but still had headquarters aboveground in Chicago until after the night of Jan. 2/3. I'm not sure what it all means other than the fact that I hadn't pondered the idea that things went underground at a different pace in different places. Carrite (talk) 02:40, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That's convenient that there's already a list drawn up. I want to get down to the Hoover Archives again this summer, where the Draper papers relating to the two CP books are located (he almost certainly will have a photocopy of this list somewhere in his stuff), so there's a decent chance I'll be able to bang into it there. The original he cites (I presume in NYC) is out of reach for me though... And it will be a while before I make it to Palo Alto, I'm just gearing up for a month long road trip/archive hopping expedition to Washington State, Minnesota Immigration History Research Center, Wisconsin Historical Society, and Michigan. So it'll be late summer before I head south. I'm spinning 1887 SLP stuff at the moment and will take a look at Novyi Mir as soon as I get a chance — probably mid-week. I'm almost positive that Revolutionary Age doesn't include such a list. best, Tim Carrite (talk) 16:39, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A socialist party history nominated for deletion

This is a general notice to members of the Socialism workgroup AND DUDEMAN5685 that there is a motion to delete an article relating to our topic: Socialist Action (Canada).

Please visit the Articles for Deletion page today and offer your opinion one way or the other about whether this page should be stricken from Wikipedia.

Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Log/2010_May_28#Socialist_Action_(Canada)

Thank you. Carrite (talk) 16:43, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to bug you again

Hey, Dude, I think we should consider terminating an old stub to which you contributed, Revolutionary Socialist Labor Party. See the discussion page Talk:Revolutionary_Socialist_Labor_Party. Carrite (talk) 17:27, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Gitlow

Per: >>f you're going over to the Hoover Institution, perhaps, you might also want to take a stroll over to the Ben Gitlow archives. You notice the last three pamphlets on his list were the ones published by the evangelical Christian Crusade Ministries. It would be interesting to have one of these online to get a feel of Gitlows final political evolution (there is almost no biographical material available on his last years). Unfortunately the only 2 libraries worldcat says has a copy of them (Columbia & East Carolina) won't part with them (or even a photocopy) through inter-library loan. The only bookseller I can find is Bolerium which is selling the The Negro Question: Communist Civil War Policy. for $35, which is outrageous for a 12p. pamphlet, no matter how rare (I tried to hagle it down, but no luck). If you have the time, it may be worthwhile to take a digital camera and see if they have a copy of one of these pamphlets at Hoover. Its pretty easy to make a digital facsimile of a rare book taking digital photos of each page, (I've done it before) and they are all pretty short...

Hey, Dude, I've been through the Gitlow stuff once already and don't remember any of the late pamphlets among that — but his is among the stuff that I want to take a look at again, so I'll keep my eyes open. They don't allow cameras at the Hoover (and charge big bucks for photos that they take) but basically allow +/- 200 photocopies per academic year, so the way to capture that stuff is with their copy machine. $35 is steep, but given the rarity of the title, probably not far off of market value. I'll be giving all my money to Bhagwan John when I'm in town and will try to remember to add this one to the stack... He'll deal a little on price on big sales, plus he gives pretty good trade credit on stuff coming in... Carrite (talk) 14:38, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Communist and SWP conventions

Hi, Dudeman,

I've been trying to clean up and elaborate United States presidential nominating conventions, and would like to add CP/WP and SWP conventions in the same format as I used for the Prohibitionists, SLP and SP. But what I've been able to scrape together so far just isn't sufficient. See User:Shakescene/conventions2#Communist, Workers' and Socialist Workers' Parties. One source I have (Tim Taylor's Book of Presidents, Arno Press 1972) actually gives opening dates for four of the earlier SWP nominating conventions, if they're any use to anyone, but I don't know where to get the essential cities for post-1960 SWP nominating conventions. It's also not clear from National conventions of the Communist Party USA which candidates were formally nominated by something one could reasonably compare to a presidential nominating convention, and which were named by the National Committee. Any help or pointers you have (or work you could do at the SWP or CPUSA Conventions articles) would be much appreciated. I'm sending User:Carrite a pointer to this thread, as it's a little hard to use a regular article talk page when discussing at least three different articles.

(By the way, I think I, under a different handle, have already talked with you at the Politics1 blog; if you haven't yet joined the SP History Yahoo! Group, I think you might learn, as well as be able to offer, some interesting stuff there.)

Fraternally as ever, —— Shakescene (talk) 05:30, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, again. While catching up with unread message traffic at the SWP_USA Yahoo! Group, I ran across this compilation of SWP national get-togethers since 1995. Perhaps it would interest you:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/swp_usa/message/17155?threaded=1&p=4

(I don't think you need to join this group to read its message board.)

You might also be interested in a (currently-not-very-active) Yahoo! Group for U.S. Communist history (broadly defined) to catch some of the off-topic spillover at the SPHistory Group:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AmericanCPHistory/

Regards as ever, —— Shakescene (talk) 17:05, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Tracing a source

Hi Dudeman5685, I'm trying to find the source of some information on the "Tristan & Iseult" page, can you help me? I noticed you were one of the original contributors to that page, so I was hoping you could help me find who wrote the "Common Source?" section, and maybe the source of that info. I'm writing an essay concerning Bedier's "Romance of Tristan and Iseult", and that section really interested me. If you have an easy answer, please excuse my ignorance - I just created an account today to make this message :). I would really appreciate a quick reply! Thanks T Rewald (talk) 08:55, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the title. I'm just going to post on the page itself first, see if someone speaks up - especially if I had to order I don't think I'd get the book in time. T Rewald (talk) 21:23, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Dude

A bit of non-WP business... I notice that THIS ALEXANDER JONAS ARTICLE on Archive.org has a typo in the title. I wonder if you might consider making the fix if you get a chance. Best, —Tim Carrite, MutantPop@aol.com Oct. 2, 2010.

CFD

Hi. I posted a merge cfd on Category:Baathism, fyi. --Soman (talk) 23:40, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Es leuchten die Sterne for deletion

The article Es leuchten die Sterne is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Es leuchten die Sterne until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Guy (Help!) 19:10, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrolled

Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the "autopatrolled" permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting new page patrollers. Please remember:

This permission does not give you any special status or authority
Submission of inappropriate material may lead to its removal
You may wish to display the {{Autopatrolled}} top icon and/or the {{User wikipedia/autopatrolled}} userbox on your user page
If, for any reason, you decide you do not want the permission, let me know and I can remove it

If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing! Acalamari 18:30, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

BLPN note

Hi, as you added a cat that is being objected to I though to let you know there as a discussion at the BLP noticeboard about it here, although its four years ago, your comments are welcome there, thanks. Off2riorob (talk) 22:18, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to two votes

Dear Dudeman5685, I have noticed that you have spent some time helping with the article "2011 Chinese protests". Therefore I would like to inform you about two votes going on:

"Vote for renaming article to "Chinese Jasmine Revolution"" at the bottom of the page

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:2011_Chinese_protests

AfD for the article

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/China's_2011_crackdown_on_dissidents#China.27s_2011_crackdown_on_dissidents

Thank you very much for your valued opinion! Best, Waikiki lwt (talk) 08:07, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

International Church of the Foursquare Gospel

I see that you removed this article from the catigory "Christian denominations founded in the United States" It seems to me that this should apply. Can you please help me understand your reasoning?

Cavebear42 (talk) 20:07, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

For purely practical reasons. I removed the article so I could put the category page under Christian denominations founded in the United States. I was trying to remove the head articles if there was already a sub-cat that could be be placed in the broader container. That was the precedent with most of the other churches. --Dudeman5685 (talk) 15:18, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for the explanation. Cavebear42 (talk) 16:00, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Anti-miscegenation laws in the United States

I liked your Anti-miscegenation laws in the United States article. Thanks. --46.64.22.2 (talk) 16:10, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Jared Lee Loughner

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your recent edits to Jared Lee Loughner have been reverted as they could be seen to be defamatory or potentially libellous. Take a look at our welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Jokestress (talk) 03:48, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wish list

Hey, Dude--

Here's one that would be swell if it were to ever make an appearance on Archive.Org:

Constitution and Program of the American Negro Labor Congress: Adopted at its First Annual Convention, Chicago, Ill., October 25-31, 1925. Chicago, IL: American Negro Labor Congress, 1925. Carrite (talk) 17:42, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No, I didn't get that NSL stuff up. I had a bad computer crash in the interim and lost tons of stuff. Can you send it again? Too bad about the Constitution, the only copy for sale online is listed at $550, which is a joke. Carrite (talk) 18:13, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Digitization project

Hey, Dude--

Marty Goodman of California is launching a digitization program centering around the publications of American Trotskyism from the 1920s to the 1950s. I was wondering if you'd like to be dragged into the correspondence circle since you're a hardcore digitization archivist. Drop me a line to my email if you're interested: MutantPop@aol.com, and my apologies for bugging you if you're not. —Tim Carrite (talk) 01:04, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

More stuff

Damn, sorry to bug you again. First off, one of your uploads at Archive.org has been hacked. See the description at http://www.archive.org/details/WhatIsCommunism. Second, I'm starting a WP page on The Revolutionary Age and was looking for your uploads of that publication at IA that I saw just yesterday. Unfortunately, with their scum-sucking search engine, I can't seem to find the pages again. A URL would be appreciated. Thanks. — Tim Carrite (talk) 20:49, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Black Mafia Family

Hey, thanks for trying to at least contribute something constructive, since this article has so many vandals. But that link is for the Philadelphia Black Mafia, an organization in the 70's. It is not for BMF or the Flenory's. jlcoving (talk) 22:23, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

SDUSA (again)

See Social Democrats USA, Talk:Social Democrats USA and User talk:Carrite#SDUSA (again). —— Shakescene (talk) 15:36, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Lovestoneites

A quick heads-up that I'm engaged in a book project on the CP(MG)/CPUSA(O). Are you aware of any party document troves in NYC? I'll be at the Hoover again the end of June playing with Lovestone, Gitlow, and Wolfe papers, let me know if there is anything I can find for you. Carrite (talk) 15:37, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Damn, I bug you a lot. I see that you have "D. Benjamin" listed as a pseudonym for a Ben Davidson (politician) in the members list. "David Benjamin" was listed as the W(C)PA candidate for NY State Senate in 1928, per "Red Ticket Goes on Ballot in NY State," Daily Worker, vol. 5, no. 241 (October 11, 1928), pg. 3. Is there any possibility that you have the "real" name and the pseudonym flipped? Carrite (talk) 18:32, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

RSGB

Hey Dude,

Just a quick line to let you know I've got Russian Soviet Government Bureau improved. I did NOT do an extensive WorldCat pamphlet search. I see there's also three volumes that I couldn't find on Archive.org. That volume 3 would be swell to have, in particular... I didn't write up the end of the story properly yet. You can have at it or I'll get it later, I'm off to the Hoover next week. Best, Carrite (talk) 15:23, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

CLA

Hey Dude,

A heads-up that I've been working on Communist League of America and it could use your patented Every Pamphlet That Matters treatment. Ditto for Workers Party of the United States. Carrite (talk) 04:21, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Third Zimmerwald Conference

Interesting article. Please consider nominating it at T:TDYK for front page exposure! --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me} 01:33, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I am afraid I have many other tasks to do, and frankly, I prefer to teach people how to fish rather than to give them the proverbial fish :) If you want to have your articles widely read, try to learn how to nom the article; I'll be more than happy to answer any specific questions. But I won't nominate the article for you; if I nominated each DYK worthy article I run into, I'd be doing nothing but :) --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me} 02:33, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Alf.laylah.wa.laylah/Committee for Nonviolent Revolution

i saw your note on Peacemakers talk page, and read up on the topic and wrote article linked to above. i noticed that NawlinWiki deleted the redirect, and was worried that there had been an afd on the CNRV, so asked him about it here: User_talk:NawlinWiki#committee_for_nonviolent_revolution. now it's beginning to appear that the only thing there ever was was the redirect? i'm just trying to find out the history before i move my stub into article space. if you have anything to add to it, even before i do, i hope you'll feel free to do so!— alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 22:19, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol survey

New page patrol – Survey Invitation

Hello Bellerophon5685! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.

If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.
If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.

Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.

You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

STOP double standarts

I'm starting to get fed up about some apparently politically-driven double standarts. I dont have anything against a unified list, but putting the type of regime that recognize the SADR is at least unbalanced compared with others. As long as the SADR is a unrecognized state at the same level that Palestine, Taiwan, Kosovo, etc... it had to receive THE SAME TREATMENT as the rest of states in that category. So, or remove the type of regime from the SADR page , or add it to the Palestine, Kosovo, Taiwan , etc... pages. No animosity, simply seeking for equanimity. Regards.--HCPUNXKID (talk) 21:18, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Atlantic Revolution

Hi. I have been drafting a page (click on Atlantic) on the Atlantic Revolutions. There is a discussion underway here on my draft, and I was wondering if any of the sources listed on the current article are on Google Books. They would be of great use to us (anyone interested in contributing to the draft). You are extremely welcome to help, too! Thanks, DCItalk 02:52, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. In Arab Dutch, you recently added a link to the disambiguation page Arab Democratic Party (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. For more information, see the FAQ or drop a line at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:21, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Religion in Niger, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Songhay (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:35, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Films of Weimar Germany

Category:Films of Weimar Germany, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. The Evil IP address (talk) 13:19, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Christianity in Morocco (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Church of St John the Evangelist

Death and funeral of Kim Jong-il (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Sandra Smith

George Allen (U.S. politician) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Robert McCartney

Greta Van Susteren (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Burden of Proof

Lisa Marie Presley (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Dream Factory

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:30, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Donald Rumsfeld, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National Academy of Public Administration (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:47, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited William G. Boykin, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Department of Defense and Black Hawk Down (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:19, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

Hi, please do use edit summaries. They really do help. Thanks Span (talk) 01:09, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ditto: Help:Edit summary. Easy to do, and helps a lot with collaboration. Thanks Eric ^talk 16:59, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ditto: Edit summaries are easy to do, helpful for other editors and, generally, the encyclopedia. In any event, according to Wikipedia's consensus policy, all edits should be explained —either by clear edit summaries, or by discussion on the associated talk page. Thanks, Quaerens-veritatem (talk) 04:57, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edit history of CP (Opposition)

Hi, Dudeman. I'm certainly no expert on moving pages (although Wikipedia has several help pages on how to do this), but, presuming that you'd set out a proper Request for Comment before moving Communist Party (Opposition) to Lovestoneites, you need to move the page history (and talk page history, if any), too. On a quick glance, there seem to be several hundred edits (beginning with your own) that need to be easily findable for reference. As I said, I'm no expert on Wikipedia:moving a page, but maybe you can get an experienced administrator to either give you tips or finish the job. Thanks. —— Shakescene (talk) 06:09, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Move request

Hello. I've fixed the format of your move request at Talk:Communist Party of the USA (Opposition), but it's a good idea to add a rationale there of why the article should be moved, or people are not likely to agree to the proposal. Station1 (talk) 18:43, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your film lists

Hi,
In your absence, there has been a vacuum over at WWII films which I have been filling for a number of years for want of another volunteer.
You also created that distinct Holocaust list. (I have seen your note.)
What was your intention over the long term? How did you plan to prevent duplication across those two lists?
If WWII were not already gigantic, I would think merging the two pages would save trouble. Avoid quibbling over definitions.
I know you rarely visit this page, so my questions are rhetorical.
Cheers, Varlaam (talk) 16:09, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Royal cambodian navy

Hi,
You recently categorised the Royal Cambodian Navy as disbanded. Could you clarify? Sources seem to say that it's was currently active. bobrayner (talk) 20:05, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Dispute resolution discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is "Chickfila, Winshape". Thank you. --216.81.94.73 (talk) 11:35, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for renaming John C. Willke. Can you tell me how to rename pages? Cwobeel (talk) 18:08, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Celica Church of Christ for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Celica Church of Christ is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Celica Church of Christ until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)} 06:06, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Manfred van H. for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Manfred van H. is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manfred van H. until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Jason from nyc (talk) 15:35, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Tagging dead links

In the future, the {{dead link}} tag goes in front of the closing </ref> tag. Thanks, Legoktm (talk) 15:54, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

All My Babies' Mamas listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ''All My Babies' Mamas''. Since you had some involvement with the 'All My Babies' Mamas' redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). -- 76.65.128.43 (talk) 04:13, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Association of Christian Democratic Students

The article Association of Christian Democratic Students has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No independent references and no substantial claim of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Deb (talk) 20:35, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Death and funeral of Margaret Thatcher

I suggest that you raise your concerns over the section's neutrality on the article talk page - otherwise the tag is likely to be removed as unexplained. Ghmyrtle (talk) 17:12, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category move for Episcopal dioceses

Hi. I've reformatted the discussion you started at WP:CFD. (These things are tricky; I recall that it took me a very long time to get one formatted right!) I see that you've made significant progress on your manual move of the category, with the result that more than one-third of the category contents are now in the destination category. Please don't continue your manual-move project; let's discuss the category at CFD first. Not only does a bot move of a category save an enormous amount of work, but the whole process is far more orderly when it's done via CFD. It's important to discuss category moves because they can affect many category interrelationships that individual editors may not be aware of. Thanks! --Orlady (talk) 15:31, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

dumbass

	dumbass cup
	For deleting truthfull facts gained from first hand knowledge. Satruth (talk) 01:30, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Edit at Ho Chi Minh

I reverted your addition of the template {{fact}} to the External links section of Ho Chi Minh. Since the link exists, there is no policy on Wikipedia that requires any further citation. If you think the link is inappropriate, you can delete it and let the other editors concerned with that page decide how to proceed. Or, preferably, you can discuss you concerns on the article's talk page to reach a consensus on the inclusion of the link. Either way asking editors to provide a citation for an external link is not correct. — Bill W. (Talk) (Contrib) — 16:47, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

OK, your new edit makes a lot more sense. Thanks. — Bill W. (Talk) (Contrib) — 17:22, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

History of Freemasonry

Thank you for your recent edits to History of Freemasonry. Most were useful, and having another pair of eyes proof-read the article was helpful in itself. Making sense of what you had done was not so easy, since you had omitted to comment your work. Please use the edit summary box, particularly when doing a number of consecutive small edits. Fiddlersmouth (talk) 22:15, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Bellerophon5685

I'm sending you this because you've made quite a few edits to the template namespace in the past couple of months. If I've got this wrong, or if I haven't but you're not interested in my request, don't worry; this is the only notice I'm sending out on the subject :).

So, as you know (or should know - we sent out a centralnotice and several watchlist notices) we're planning to deploy the VisualEditor on Monday, 1 July, as the default editor. For those of us who prefer markup editing, fear not; we'll still be able to use the markup editor, which isn't going anywhere.

What's important here, though, is that the VisualEditor features an interactive template inspector; you click an icon on a template and it shows you the parameters, the contents of those fields, and human-readable parameter names, along with descriptions of what each parameter does. Personally, I find this pretty awesome, and from Monday it's going to be heavily used, since, as said, the VisualEditor will become the default.

The thing that generates the human-readable names and descriptions is a small JSON data structure, loaded through an extension called TemplateData. I'm reaching out to you in the hopes that you'd be willing and able to put some time into adding TemplateData to high-profile templates. It's pretty easy to understand (heck, if I can write it, anyone can) and you can find a guide here, along with a list of prominent templates, although I suspect we can all hazard a guess as to high-profile templates that would benefit from this. Hopefully you're willing to give it a try; the more TemplateData sections get added, the better the interface can be. If you run into any problems, drop a note on the Feedback page.

Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 21:38, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

don't panic

Nothing was deleted, it can be replaced, but it's really the reverse-unilaterally sticking a huge chunk of half-finished work that will have to be cleaned up was why I took it down. Let's sandbox it and I will help you make the corrections. It's not a quick fix, and I can see your hard work, so relax and let's chip away at it.--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 00:56, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

moving to your talkpage-this is your map, let's talk here

Scouting World Map

I realize their is room for criticism on the map, but could you have informed me on my talk page before unilaterally deleting it? It did take alot of time and, as you say, hard work, completing it. If the nomenclature is the main problem I can work that out editing the description. You obviously know more about this as an Eagle Scout, I only got to Webalo. I was mainly concerned with showing which countries had "regular" organizations in good standing with the WOSM and which countries, for what ever reason, were served by other countries' scout organizations, only had unofficial Scout groups or had no scouting at all.--Bellerophon5685 (talk) 18:03, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

All right, what needs to be done with map? I know that the page distinguishes between "potential members", "countries with no Scouting", and "Other". Looking closer at the list and criteria, I realized that the "potential members" list was set up in 2008, and I couldn't really find any sources for it; likewise, I couldn't find much a difference between "countries with no Scouting" and "Other". I figured it would be best to create two classes for countries that did not have any WOSM representation - those with Scouting groups that are not members of WOSM - Central African Republic, Peoples Republic of China, Iraq, Afghanistan - and those where no Scout organizations are reported to exist - North Korea, Laos, Cuba, Burma. There was some difficulty in determining if there were scout groups in some of these areas - the evidence for Western Sahara and Somaliland is particularly sketchy - but I determined if there was RS for scouting of some kind in the areas they would be included in the first, lime green, cat.

As for the areas served by other countries Scout organizations, I concede that with all those little dots in the Caribbean, Oceania and Indian Ocean, it is difficult to determine if one dot is supposed to represent, for instance Reunion or Comoros, Norfolk Island or New Caledonia etc. Hopefully you can determine which dot represents what territory and we can establish the proper color code.

One territory I admittedly forgot was East Timor, so it will have to be colored in the correct color, which I think should be lime green.--Bellerophon5685 (talk) 01:13, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have just noticed this after reverting your addition of the map back into the article. The map is misleading. Countries join WOSM when there are several Scout organisation by them forming a committee which affiliates, or when there is a single organisation, that organisation affiliates. There is really no essential difference. In both situations there can be organisations that do not affiliate with WOSM, but might affiliate, for example, to the World Federation of Independent Scouts. So why do you distinguish the USA, UK, Australia, New Zealand, France and Denmark, for example, from all the ones you colour red. Also for France you say that the "Scouts et Guides de France" are the affiliating organisation. They are not. They joint several other organisations in forming Scoutisme Français, a committee that affiliates. Sorry, but the map is just wrong, but I encourage you to get it right and then it can be in the article. --Bduke (Discussion) 04:42, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I think you misunderstand - red was merely supposed to symbolize that the countries has one or more regularly affiliated organizations. That could be a single group like the Boy Scouts of America, a federation of groups like in Israel, or two groups like in Canada. Like you say, there is no essential difference. USA, UK, Australia, New Zealand, France and Denmark all serve their own countries as well as other states and or non-sovereign areas under their own governments. Ergo Denmark also serves Greenland and Faroe Islands, Australia serves Nauru, US serves Palau, Micronesia, Marshall Islands, American Samoa, Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands, the UK serves a bunch of them. Anytime one group served more than one jurisdiction, I thought that it justified indicating that on the map. For "normal" jurisdictions that only served one country I just used red.--Bellerophon5685 (talk) 04:59, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

First, I agree that the discussion should be here, but you might care to provide a link at Talk:List of World Organization of the Scout Movement members. Second, let us have a link here to the map itself at File:WOSMMembers.svg.png so we know what we are talking about. OK, I did misunderstand you, but the map is still utterly confusing. The text on the image page says "Other areas are served by other National societies", but this focuses on the other areas, which are small and most are difficult to see on the map. The focus of the map shows yellow for the USA, blue for UK, green for France, purple for Australia, and orange for New Zealand. This is distinguishing them from all the countries in red in a quite inappropriate way. They are not really different. I strongly disagree that serving more than one jurisdiction justifies indicating them in different colours on the map. It is as I said utterly confusing. --Bduke (Discussion) 06:31, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

GUOOF

FYI,

the Peter Ogden you linked to is not an African American sailor.
"International Encyclopedia of Secret Societies and Fraternal Orders New York; Facts on File, inc 1997 pp.187-8" is not mentioned on the page Alan Axelrod

Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 20:42, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

IOOF

Regarding your recent edit, what is the definition of a "secret society"? It would seem to me that IOOF has never been a "secret society", but I'm willing to be educated. Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 14:05, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

CLIPSAS

You moved the CLIPSAS page to Centre de Liaison et d'Information des Puissances maçonniques Signataires de l'Appel de Strasbourg, would it not make more sense to move it to Centre of Liaison and Information of Masonic Powers Signatories of Strasbourg Appeal, to keep their English name in the title? I'm not sure what's the proper protocol is. --Truther2012 (talk) 22:26, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Ku Klux Klan titles and vocabulary

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Ku Klux Klan titles and vocabulary you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of LT910001 -- LT910001 (talk) 02:12, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Zimmerwald Conference

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Zimmerwald Conference you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 13:40, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Ku Klux Klan titles and vocabulary

The article Ku Klux Klan titles and vocabulary you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Ku Klux Klan titles and vocabulary for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of LT910001 -- LT910001 (talk) 08:02, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Zimmerwald Conference

The article Zimmerwald Conference you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Zimmerwald Conference for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 08:32, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2014

Hi, if you haven't already, you should consider signing up for WikiCup 2014. Cheers, --Sp33dyphil ©^hat_ontributions 02:20, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Thrivent Financial for Lutherans

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Thrivent Financial for Lutherans you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of LT910001 -- LT910001 (talk) 04:41, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Inter-Allied Socialist Conferences of World War I

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Inter-Allied Socialist Conferences of World War I you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Quadell -- Quadell (talk) 17:02, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Inter-Allied Socialist Conferences of World War I

The article Inter-Allied Socialist Conferences of World War I you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Inter-Allied Socialist Conferences of World War I for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Quadell -- Quadell (talk) 17:42, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Thrivent Financial for Lutherans

The article Thrivent Financial for Lutherans you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Thrivent Financial for Lutherans for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of LT910001 -- LT910001 (talk) 07:02, 15 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Inter-Allied Socialist Conferences of World War I

The article Inter-Allied Socialist Conferences of World War I you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Inter-Allied Socialist Conferences of World War I for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Quadell -- Quadell (talk) 14:42, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Loyal Order of Moose

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Loyal Order of Moose you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of North8000 -- North8000 (talk) 16:21, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above was written by a bot but this is written by me. Not sure if you care to have such involvement, but I have some open questions there. Sincerely, North8000 (talk) 14:31, 2 January 2014 (UTC) Reviewer[reply]

Your GA nomination of Order of Heptasophs

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Order of Heptasophs you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Casliber -- Casliber (talk) 13:22, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to join WikiProject Freedom of speech

WP:WikiProject Freedom of speech

There is a WikiProject about Freedom of speech, called WP:WikiProject Freedom of speech. If you're interested, here are some easy things you can do:

List yourself as a participant in the WikiProject, by adding your username here: Wikipedia:WikiProject_Freedom_of_speech#Participants.
Add userbox {{User Freedom of speech}} to your userpage, which lists you as a member of the WikiProject.
Tag relevant talk pages of articles and other relevant pages using {{WikiProject Freedom of speech}}.
Join in discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Freedom of speech.
Notify others you think might be interested in Freedom of speech to join the WikiProject.

Thank you for your interest in Freedom of speech, — Cirt (talk) 00:24, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Committee of 300

Hi, can you check the latest addition to the above article - I think it is unsourced/original research, but I'm not sure. Thanks Denisarona (talk) 06:40, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Order of Heptasophs

The article Order of Heptasophs you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Order of Heptasophs for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Casliber -- Casliber (talk) 13:42, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Loyal Order of Moose

The article Loyal Order of Moose you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Loyal Order of Moose for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of North8000 -- North8000 (talk) 21:22, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Elks of Canada logo.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Elks of Canada logo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:29, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

An RfC that you may be interested in...

As one of the previous contributors to {{Infobox film}} or as one of the commenters on it's talk page, I would like to inform you that there has been a RfC started on the talk page as to implementation of previously deprecated parameters. Your comments and thoughts on the matter would be welcomed. Happy editing!

This message was sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of {{U|Technical 13}} ^{(t • e • c)} 18:26, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Lee Meriwether (author) may have broken the syntax by modifying 5 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:50, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

April 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to World Federation of Teachers Unions may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

[[7ème arrondissement, Paris|7ème]].<ref>''Facts about international Communist front organisations]'' p. 55</ref> In 1978 its headquarters is reported at [[Wilhelm Wolff Strasse]] 21, [[East Berlin]]
million members in 34 countries.<ref>''Facts about international Communist front organisations]'' p. 56</ref> By the 1978 this had grown to over 16 million in 74 organizations in 50 countries.<

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:12, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to World Federation of Teachers Unions may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:35, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to World Federation of Teachers Unions may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:54, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Trade Unions International of Chemical, Oil and Allied Workers may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

the ICPS claimed membership in 25 countries.<ref>''Directory of World Federation of Trade Unions]'' December 1958 p.52</ref> In 1976 it claimed 7 million members in 59 affiliated unions in 37

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:11, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Chaco crisis

Thanks for the feedback, that's a good point. I reworded the text a bit. The Chaco crisis was some time in the making prior to the 1932 war, see http://books.google.com/books?id=tW_eEVbVxpEC&pg=PA1062 "As tension continued in the disputed Chaco Boreal following the incident at Sorpresa in early 1927, Paraguayan Major Rafael Franco led an unauthorized attack on the fortress..." (5 December 1928) and http://books.google.com/books?id=baTjvUCdjIAC&pg=PA43 "At the 1929 Latin American Communist conference, Bolivian delegate Mendizábal called the looming Chaco conflict “a struggle between Yankee and English..." --Soman (talk) 18:58, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Brazilian CGT, see books.google.com/books?id=a0S2AAAAIAAJ p. 96 "GENERAL LABOR CONFEDERATION OF BRAZIL (Confederacao Geral do Trabalho do Brasil — CGT). Organized in 1929 with leadership from the Brazilian Communist Party (PCB),..." --Soman (talk) 19:15, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion - Fifth International re-listed

Greetings! It seems that Fifth International is re-listed at Articles for deletion. I am in favor of keep, and I actually I have nothing to add to my previous comment on the subject. I hope you have time to take a look! Cheers! =P Jayaguru-Shishya (talk) 17:36, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Lions Clubs International

Lions Clubs International is as much an organization as Rotary International and Kiwanis. Are those going to be removed from the categories they are shown in? Best, User:Oldbeeg 184.35.27.171 (talk) 18:58, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sterling Hall bombing

The tags you added to this article made no apparent sense (asking for citations for links?). I've removed them. If there was something you were trying to accomplish, I couldn't figure it out. - SummerPhD (talk) 23:16, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merge discussion for Insurgency in Eritrea

An article that you have been involved in editing, Insurgency in Eritrea, has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Catlemur (talk) 10:00, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Bellerophon5685. You have new messages at Katangais's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of American ethnic and religious fraternal orders has been accepted

List of American ethnic and religious fraternal orders, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Lor^Talk 02:38, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Account Flags

Hello Bellerophon5685, you may have received a notice that your account is no longer confirmed. That is because you have been upgraded to autoconfirmed. No additional action is needed on your part. You can review your current account flags at Special:Preferences (under Member of groups:). Happy editing, — xaosflux ^Talk 15:59, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hey J.—

I've been trying to get somebody to punch you up to "Autopatrolled" status, which should have happened for you about 4 years ago but didn't. I pitched Orangemike but he didn't see it, I don't think. Hang in there, —Tim /// Carrite (talk) 04:57, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I thought I'd done that days ago!!!! --Orange Mike | Talk 17:53, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrolled right

Hi Bellerophon5685, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the autopatrolled right to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the patroller right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 14:43, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations and thanks to both Orangemike and Malik Shabazz for taking a look. Instead of running new starts through the AFC mess, just start them up yourself in mainspace — now you won't have new page patrollers breathing down your neck 5 minutes after creation. See ya, —tim /// Carrite (talk) 09:09, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Heads up for a great tool

I don't know if you're on the train yet, but if you aren't I can't recommend strongly enough that you try and get set up with Wikipedia's Newspapers.com access: Wikipedia:Newspapers.com. Their search engine absolutely kicks ass and the pages are downloadable to your harddrive like JSTOR articles are. I have found it an amazing tool for biography writing and I'm positive you'll be all over it if you get hooked up. Carrite (talk) 09:15, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Side degree for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Side degree is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Side degree until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MSJapan (talk) 22:27, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Preuss et al.

Your three authors of choice are atrocious, frankly. A book from 1899, another from 1925, and a mass-market book from 1997? You're basically retyping the books into Wikipedia, and you aren't really researching. When you don't know what the first side degree was, you don't really have enough knowledge to work in the topic. Case in point: you categorized several women's fraternal orders as side degrees, and they don't meet the definition at all, nor do you know if they are "humorous". My point is that you may have an interest in the area, but you don't have the depth of understanding needed to write an article about it properly, and not based wholly on the sources you used. For example, the requirement you cited for joining Shriners hasn't been in effect since 2000, but since your sources predated that, you didn't know, despite the fact that it is made clear in the Shriners article.

You did something similar in another article, using the same authors, and ended up with a lot of issues as a result: I've found several bias and categorization issues in your List of American ethnic and religious fraternal orders article as well, to the point where it should never have been accepted at AFC, and I'm seriously considering AfDing it as blatant copyvio. MSJapan (talk) 23:02, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, there aren't "women's appendent versions of side degrees." Appendant bodies and side degrees are interchangeable terms for the most part. However, there may be a level of recognition for an appendant body that may not be available to a side degree. It's also much more complicated for women's groups, because men can't officially join them in some cases, and are required in others. For example, Shriners has both a women's auxiliary within the local Centers (for wives who like to volunteer), and the Ladies Oriental Shrine and Daughters of the Nile outside of it as more formalized women's groups. Are they humorous, as the Shrine was intended to be? I don't know. So the definitions being used are problematic. The women cannot join Shriners directly, so neither of those two groups would be a side degree, nor are they necessarily appendant, because the membership doesn't overlap. MSJapan (talk) 23:44, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That format basically is similar to the Masonic bodies article, which avoids the hairsplitting that this list causes. If that's the case, the stuff might as well be merged in over there instead. MSJapan (talk) 00:25, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

For the few lines that are in there otherwise, most of the main organizations already have pages. Might as well put it in there, I would think, if it isn't already. MSJapan (talk) 00:42, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of American ethnic and religious fraternal orders for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of American ethnic and religious fraternal orders is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of American ethnic and religious fraternal orders until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MSJapan (talk) 23:28, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've temporarily removed your comments from this AFD because you improperly inserted them in the middle of MSJapan's nomination, effectively destroying their comment for the sake of yours. As there's no way for me to fix the formatting without rewriting what you wrote, removing it was really the only solution, so you can go into the article history to extract what you want to repost below the nominator's comment. If you want to respond point by point, you'll have to use quotes (or the same numbers they used) in your response to highlight what specifically you're responding to. postdlf (talk) 01:31, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of North American fraternal benefit orders has been accepted

List of North American fraternal benefit orders, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:19, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of animal fraternal orders (August 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of animal fraternal orders and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:03, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Bellerophon5685, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:03, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Merger discussion for 1864 Republican National Convention

An article that you have been involved in editing—1864 Republican National Convention —has been proposed for merging with 1864 National Union National Convention. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. older ≠ wiser 18:15, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've completed the merge, by changing 1864 Republican National Convention article, into a redirect to 1864 National Union National Convention. GoodDay (talk) 00:06, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanx for the "Organization established in" updates for the Greek Letter Organizations.

Thanks for adding all of the "Organization established in" Category adds for the Greek Letter Organizations, I'd forgotten how many of them I have in my watchlist. :)Naraht (talk) 02:44, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Knights of the macabees pendent

My name is mark i have a pendent i got from my grandmother that does not show on the web anywhere i look what are the kotm pendents made of so i can find out if its real or no Weldnbean (talk) 02:21, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Texas State Federation of Labor

Hello! Your submission of Texas State Federation of Labor at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Crispulop (talk) 15:53, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Texas State Federation of Labor

On 22 December 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Texas State Federation of Labor, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Texas State Federation of Labor affiliated with the American Federation of Labor in 1903 only to avoid conflict with the railroad brotherhoods? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Texas State Federation of Labor. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:02, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Derek Savage

Hey, just giving you a head's up. Please don't add any more information about Savage or his film to Wikipedia. The guy is sort of a drama magnet right now and most of the attempts to add him to Wikipedia are a result of people coming over to kind of extend the drama from the Encyclopedia Dramatica lolcow entry about him. (sighs) You were pretty neutral about everything so I think that you were editing in good faith, but be cautious about anything involving him, as there have been a lot of people that have edited the past article about CCStK that have come here with some definite bad intent. Any article about this guy or his film will be such a huge target for mischief that the article would require a lot of sourcing to show that it's really worth keeping on Wikipedia.

On a side note, there is something truly ironic about the whole situation. Guy makes a video about why it's wrong to bully others, then bullies a YouTuber because he posted an honest opinion and gets bullied himself by ED-ers as a result. Circle of life, eh? Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:48, 25 December 2015 (UTC) Derek Savage[reply]

I only learned of the incident after the fact. I go to IHE occasionally, so I didn't see any of the videos when they came out, but reviewed the situation when it was over. I am sure that many people will come to wikipedia looking for information on Savage, and the incident, but so far all I can find are blogs, youtube videos, imdb and material that Savage has put out himself. These are very hard to justify as RS, but if someone at a newspaper or perhaps a blog that is considered a "respectable" news source (most newspaper content is online only these days anyway, so the line is very thin), maybe an article could be created for Savage, his movie or the incident itself.

So, BTW, I see you are a female wikipedian who loves horror movies. You wouldn't be like available, right?;)(I hope that statement is not against Wikipedia policy)--Bellerophon5685 (talk) 18:33, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

How this ended

So, BTW, I see you are a female wikipedian who loves horror movies. You wouldn't be like available, right?;)(I hope that statement is not against Wikipedia policy)--Bellerophon5685 (talk) 18:33, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

LOL, it's not. You're fairly direct, aren't you? Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 18:44, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I heard about this after the fact as well. It'd be interesting if we could have an article about him, but offhand the notability here is too slim to warrant having a page under these circumstances. He's prime trolling material, after all. Not quite up to CWC standards, but he's still a target and Wikipedia tends to be overly cautious with stuff like that. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 18:45, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
If you want a good laugh, you need to download Dark Dungeons (film). I wrote an article about this via a request and ended up purchasing it. Well worth the $5 so far. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 18:47, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Is this how we start the New Year? FWIW, I believe WP:NOTDATINGSERVICE is applicable here. Hmm, maybe you two can share a Crystal Pepsi? (see his userpage). Thanks for the amusement as it certainly made me laugh, SwisterTwister talk 05:12, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I suppose I should've chastised him, but I admit that I had to admire his chutzpah. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 14:09, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I guess that was inappropriate, and I'm sorry if I made anyone feel uncomfortable. Its just that time of the year between Christmas and when things get going again in mid-January when one gets bored and lonely, and after hours of just killing time on wikipedia I thought "What the heck? She seems nice, has similar interest, might be worth a shot"--Bellerophon5685 (talk) 05:46, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

LOL. No harm, no foul. I understand where you're coming from. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:08, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Santa Cruz Province, Argentina may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

{{sister project links|voy=Category:Santa Cruz Province)}}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:06, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:List of animal fraternal orders concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:List of animal fraternal orders, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:36, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Elks of Canada logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Elks of Canada logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 04:00, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mawdoo3

Hello.

Thank you for your edit of Mawdoo3.

You've changed the category from "General encyclopedias" to "Asian encyclopedias".

Since Mawdoo3#Visitors indicates the immense popularity of this website in African countries such as Egypt, Algeria, Morocco and Tunisia, do you feel this re-categorization is OK? --Muzammil (talk) 04:34, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Negro Labor Committee

On 18 February 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Negro Labor Committee, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Negro Labor Committee was formed in 1935 so that African Americans could be allowed to join labor unions? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Negro Labor Committee. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:02, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:List of animal fraternal orders

Hello, Bellerophon5685. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "List of animal fraternal orders".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 14:10, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Encyclopedia photos

Hello! Sorry for the late response but I was not at home in the past few days. The reason why the photos from the Romanian Wikipedia cannon be used in your articles about the two Romanian encyclopaedias is that they are not uploaded in Wikipedia Commons and therefore cannot be used outside the Romanian Wikipedia. The picture I used from the Bulgarian Wikipedia is uploaded in Commons. Regards, --Gligan (talk) 16:55, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Encyclopedism category

I noticed you emptied and blanked Category:Encyclopedism. If you started a discussion about this and I missed it, I apologize. If this was just a unilateral decision to get rid of the category, please restore and take it through WP:CFD. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 04:55, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

EB1911

I am busy at the moment. I will reply in detail later in the Wikipedia day. -- PBS (talk) 08:49, 20 April 2016 (UTC) It is difficult to know how to answer your questions. So I am going to post them to the talk pages of the two projects[reply]

-- PBS (talk) 21:14, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Student organizations established in...

Just curious, what are your expected start and end dates for these subcats? prior to 1776? all the way to today?Naraht (talk) 10:35, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I'll go with the year from 1840 (which is more or less when the first of the social greeks started) onward. Does that work?Naraht (talk) 20:26, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, kept finding them in larger numbers back to the 1820s. I just hope that I'm helping rather than hurting your efforts.Naraht (talk) 18:37, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Add this template?

{{Cat topic in year|topic=Student organizations established|year=1980}}Naraht (talk) 18:06, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reversions

Can it be you don't think Boccaccio is a Renaissance writer? If so, you are just wrong. Please stop this! Johnbod (talk) 04:16, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

2016 Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Community Survey

The Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation has appointed a committee to lead the search for the foundation’s next Executive Director. One of our first tasks is to write the job description of the executive director position, and we are asking for input from the Wikimedia community. Please take a few minutes and complete this survey to help us better understand community and staff expectations for the Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director.

Survey, (hosted by Qualtrics)

Thank you, The Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Steering Committee via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:48, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Phi Delta Phi cats

In going through the Professional Fraternities and adding "in the united states" , I got to Phi Delta Phi. I'm interested in a number of things in regards to the categorization.

Should it still be listed under Professional Fraternities, it certainly was one and then changed to an honor society in 2012. (or possibly listed in both)
If so, should the Phi Delta Phi category (containing both the main article and the list of Inns) be added to Honor Societies or Professional Fraternities in the US and the two articles under it removed? (For the Alpha Phi Omega lists of chapters, the categories for the lists are simply Alpha Phi Omega and the List of chapters...

Naraht (talk) 19:48, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

And point 2? Should the categories apply to the Phi Delta Phi category?Naraht (talk) 19:59, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

But the list of Inns should jsut be in Phi Delta Phi and "Lists of chapters...."...Naraht (talk) 20:05, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, see what I put on your talk page.--Bellerophon5685 (talk) 20:07, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thx. I'll try to comment tomorrow.Naraht (talk) 20:13, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Alpha Phi Omega

Restored the Professional category for Alpha Phi Omega based on the Professional Fraternity Association's definitions for membership (Given that Alpha Phi Omega is a member of the PFA). (ANd has the Template:Professional_Fraternities

To be eligible for Fraternal membership, a fraternity must be national or international in character and shall charter its institutional chapters only at appropriately accredited colleges, universities, or professional schools. The fraternity shall be identified by, or related to a field of study or common interest. Member fraternities may also initiate members of other fraternities.

I fully admit COI on this, and if you'd like a 3rd party, I'm fine with that.Naraht (talk) 21:08, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure

I can follow how a foreign language wikipedia project can be in the same project as books - reference works - any clues as to what I am missing?

There is nothing in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Reference_works that suggests that foreign language wikiprojects are in actual fact 'reference works' - as the way I read the project scope and aim.

Please dont get me wrong - there is already WikiProject Wikipedia for things about wikipedia.

The scope is the issue - and I am suggesting where you have tagged wikiprojects, it really should be wikiproject wikipedia

Then you are clear of the issue of claiming sister projects as 'reference works' ... cheers JarrahTree 06:05, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Username typo

Hi, just to let you know I corrected a typo in which you added my username to a template at Wikipedia:WikiProject Reference works in this edit. Bellerophon _{talk to me} 17:26, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ghostbusters Accolades

This section I made on the talk page might be relevant to you, since you appear to have made the change to the section in question. Silver seren^C 04:10, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome

I appreciate your noticing The Five Thousand Dictionary. Best wishes, Keahapana (talk) 23:32, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

IMDB isn't reliable

Ok. So I'm not going to doubt that it is probably true but IMDB is not a reliable source at all. We should try to find a better one.*Treker (talk) 01:57, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Progressive Democratic Students' Federation ‎

You left a neutrality tag on Progressive Democratic Students' Federation, but have not started any discussion on the talk page: talk:Progressive Democratic Students' Federation. As you have not raised any issues on the talk page, I have removed the tag. I have seen many such tags without any discussion started that are years old. See template:POV#When to use for more information. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 02:12, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Bellerophon5685. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

See Combat America, Target-Invisible and Wings Up

Did some work on those articles. FWiW Bzuk (talk) 23:13, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Die Deutsche Kampfspiele

Hi Bellerophon, many thanks for adding the article about Die Deutsche Kampfspiele. May I suggest moving the article to either "Die Deutschen Kampfspiele" or just "Deutsche Kampfspiele". The addition of the article "die" requires an inflection of the following word. Thx. Jake Brockman (talk) 08:56, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Day of Potsdam

On 15 March 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Day of Potsdam, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Day of Potsdam was used by the Nazis to symbolize continuity with German history? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Day of Potsdam. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Day of Potsdam), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Mifter (talk) 00:01, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

"To Understand the World Around Us"

Thank you for quality articles such as Loyal Order of Moose, Anti-miscegenation laws in the United States and now Day of Potsdam, for the creation of countless article talk pages, categories and navboxes, for following "the phenomenon of extremism deserves an unbiased, scientific examination" and your motto, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:46, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Three years ago, you were recipient no. 1621 of Precious, a prize of QAI! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:30, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Ilse Hess

Hello! Your submission of Ilse Hess at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 22:43, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Ilse Hess

On 20 April 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Ilse Hess, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Ilse Hess, who was one of the first women to study at the University of Munich, remained a committed Nazi after World War II? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ilse Hess. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Ilse Hess), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Mifter (talk) 00:04, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Eva Chamberlain DYK

DYK nomination of Eva Chamberlain

Hello! Your submission of Eva Chamberlain at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! hahnch e n 13:27, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not create links to non-existent categories

Like you did here[4] and here[5]. Per WP:REDNOT- 'An article should never be left with a non-existent (red-linked) category in it. Either the category should be created, or else the nonexistent category link should be removed or changed to a category that does exist'....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 14:08, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. I can see you have been around for a while, and I can also see it has been politely requested several times in the past. As it has been asked several times in the past, it seems quite appropriate to give you the full template notice which explains all of the reasons why it's useful and necessary. Please always give edit summaries, even for obvious or trivial changes. For example "+{{Authority control}}" would be sufficient and quite appropriate for your recent addition of that template to many articles, if that is the only change being made by the edit. Murph9000 (talk) 11:58, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Authority control" template

What does adding a blank "Authority control" template to an article do?
P.S. Time to archive your user talk page... AnonMoos (talk) 23:13, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I do understand that {{Authority control}} will emit some output once the appropriate values have been added to the articles' Wikidata items. I doubt that will ever happen for many of the articles where the template has been added in this recent spree. Further, how hard would be to place a simple remark into the edit summary, e.g. "+{{Authority control}}" – using the template's proper name instead of a redirect, {{authoritycontrol}}? As it is, this editing binge seems to have no purpose and only clutters watchlists. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 09:16, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Additionally, these edits which only added that template should really have been marked as minor edits. Your lack of response to a reasonable request to provide edit summaries is of significant concern. If you don't want this to escalate into a formal incident, I strongly suggest that you respond to constructive feedback. Ignoring reasonable requests without a good reason and without response is quite often viewed as disruptive editing, which can also apply to bulk edits which have no immediate benefit to the encyclopedia and are not obviously supported by community consensus. Murph9000 (talk) 09:25, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am trying to find out how to create wikidata entries about the pages I added ACs for. I didn't realize that just adding the templates whould create a problem and I am sorry that I clogged up your watchlists.--Bellerophon5685 (talk) 20:11, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I can see you are working hard and doing your best. For now it would be much appreciated if you could mark the changes as 'minor' which would alleviate the watchlist-clogging for everyone. Chiswick Chap (talk) 07:51, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't add empty {{Authority control}} templates to random articles unless those articles actually have authority control IDs in Wikidata (or the article is a biography). Thank you. Kaldari (talk) 08:47, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Why have you ignored multiple polite, reasonable, and informative requests to provide edit summaries (and to make proper use of the "minor edit" feature)? This goes far beyond the question of whether the edits are even necessary. Large volume bulk editing without proper edit summaries and failing to mark minor edits as minor is frequently considered to be disruptive editing, and people do get blocked for continuing this type of behaviour after multiple clear requests and warnings about it. Please consider this a warning. Thanks. Murph9000 (talk) 09:44, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You're still doing it: Kiss Me, Kate, The Taming of the Shrew (Shebalin), Troilus and Cressida (opera) – no edit summary, not marked as minor, pointless. Stop it. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 06:51, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong category at 70,000 Character Petition

Can you please explain what your motivation is in changing categories at 70,000 Character Petition?

You recently removed category 1962 works and added Category:1963 documents in this edit with no edit summary. You may have a perfectly good reason for this change, and I'd like to know what it is. Even though you're an editor with over ten years experience, you've just been advised, again, about using edit summaries. C'mon, do I really have to quote the guideline to you?

Here it is: It is considered good practice to provide a summary for every edit, especially when reverting (undoing) the actions of other editors or deleting existing text; otherwise, people may question your motives for the edit. Edits that do not have an edit summary are more likely to be reverted, because it may not be obvious what the purpose of the edit was. We can't read your mind, so please do use the edit summary to explain your motivation.

I reverted your change with the edit summary, "1962, not 3." Perhaps that was too brief a summary; what I meant was, "Reverted your edit, since the 70,000 Character Petition was written in 1962, not 1963." I hope that is clearer.

You reverted back to your preference, again with no edit summary at all. I'm going to revert you for a second time after I leave you this message, with a full edit summary along the lines of what I wrote above. Please do not change the categories at this article again without a full justification of your reasoning in the edit summary, or on the article talk page. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 00:17, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I took the liberty of copying your response on my talk page here; see the banner at the top of the page about keeping convos in one place. If you strongly object to my having copied your response here, just delete the next paragraph with no TPO foul; thanks.

At 01:16, 25 June 2017 (UTC), Bellerophon5685 said: I was merely trying to narrow the rather large miscellaneous year works, with year documents. I your edit because you had pointed out that I had put the document in the wrong year. However, it was still in "1962 works", I wanted to put it in "1962 documents". --Bellerophon5685 (talk) 01:16, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, that makes sense, so getting the year wrong was just an oversight, then. Go ahead and make your change again, but not with revert, cuz that will reinstall the wrong year again, but with a manual edit, and I won't touch it (assuming you get it right). Since we've been back and forth twice at the article about this, a really full and solid edit summary in your next edit will help others trying to understand how this got resolved, and avoid some 3rd party reverting you once again.

Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 01:37, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, you were too quick on the draw, and made your change before reading the above. Your category change is fine, no reason to revert that. But once again, you left out the edit summary. I'd add it for you, but that would be mind-reading again, and anyone else looking at the history might think I was misrepresenting you. I'm sorry, but would you please go back and fix the edit summary? You probably know that you can't actually edit an old edit summary, so the way to do that, is with a dummy edit. Please go back to the article, and change at least one character: if there's a typo, fix it, and if there isn't, just add a space somewhere, or delete a space that isn't needed. For your edit summary, paste this (in your own words, if you don't like this phrasing:)

[[WP:DUMMY|Dummy edit]]: Adding edit summary: Replaced [[:Category:1962 works]] with [[:Category:1962 documents]] (not '1963', my bad).

and save it. The article will remain identical, but you'll have your comment in the edit history justifying your change. As things stand now, someone might come by, assume you're edit-warring, and revert you again. Mathglot (talk) 01:52, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mathglot, this all seems like a tempest in a teapot. One character was wrong in what should be an obvious routine edit while sorting categories. You reverted it, replacing it with the correct year, but the broader cat that I was trying to narrow down. Eventually we discussed the issue and put it in the right category. Do you really think anyone reading the article cares about the minutia of this edit conflict?:) I think we should devote our time and energy to more pressing matters.--Bellerophon5685 (talk) 01:59, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Well, maybe it is that. But seeing as how you just wrote six sentences above explaining all about your disdain for the tempest, when you could have just written one sentence in the edit summary of the article instead, but chose not to, I guess you prefer your tempests in teapots. Mathglot (talk) 08:11, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Currency

Shouldn't it be "currencies introduced in x year"? J 1982 (talk) 22:23, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Typeface date categories

Hi, just seen that you've been trying to create these. I try to look after the font articles on Wikipedia, and I have to say that this seems like a bad idea to me. Font dating especially pre-WWI is plagued with incredibly unreliable dates, that can disagree by as much as three to four years, and I believe are often sourced to books in the twenties to fifties based on company records and archives that have now vanished. There's also a lot of confusion between dates on working drawings and the date of release. To be quite honest, I don't believe them and was in the process of stripping a lot of them out. You can see an example of this here, in a discussion I commented on. As Hardwig comments, "it is easy to find all kinds of dates, but they are rarely backed up." (Semplicità is an example - I've seen release dates from 1928 to 1931, none of them citing a contemporary news source.) Blythwood (talk) 04:33, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the comment. I'll think about which dates it's appropriate to keep. One problem, to be quite honest, is that "introduction" is often a mess with a font because metal type fonts were often released to valued customers or a private client first. Joanna was first used in the print shop of its designer Eric Gill only, then licensed to J.M. Dent for private use, then finally released to the public in 1958 - about 27 years after it was first made as metal type. So false precision can be a real problem. Blythwood (talk) 04:52, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Another example of why this is a problem, just to warn you - Albertus was designed beginning in 1932, but it wasn't introduced in 1932 - font production often took years from design submission to production in those days. In fact, it didn't reach an advance showing until 1935. Whoever introduced that category simply didn't bother to read the article or check any sources. I'm afraid the font articles contained a huge amount of false information like this which I haven't finished stripping out, sorry. Blythwood (talk) 22:08, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:The Most Dangerous Game‎

I see that you have removed articles from Template:The Most Dangerous Game‎. Do you intend to leave the template in those pages?--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 05:44, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I see it is only in one of the two, but please don't mess up linkages without changing the proper articles.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 05:46, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Article on Captain James Davis

I am the last surviving male descendent of Captain James Davis and accidentally came across the article on him on Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a contribution to it and was curious as to why you were interested enough to do so. Also, I'd like to thank you for contributing.

Regards, Richard Davis RJDavis (talk) 04:19, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Symbols by date of introduction category

Since the individual "Symbols introduced in [year]" categories each only have a few members at most, I was thinking that it might be better to categorize the symbols by the decade they were introduced instead. What do you think? Trivialist (talk) 13:35, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cool. I guess which ever one of us gets around to it first can do it. (Possibly me, but I'm off to lunch. :) ) Trivialist (talk) 15:15, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New category?

Would making a category named something like "1996 professional wrestling introductions" or something similar be a good idea in this case?★Trekker (talk) 00:01, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Blanking categories

Please don't just blank categories - it causes more work for everyone. If you find one that's an obvious mistake such as Category:Zoos established in year 1964 then tag it with {{db-g6}} and it will get deleted. Le Deluge (talk) 19:14, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Visaria/Visalia

I note that you made edits to the article about the fictional town Visaria which I think is the setting of some Wolfman movies although I am not seeing this explicitly in the wikipedia articles about them. I would like to mention that many years ago I was listening to one of the films and I heard a line mentioning the town while I was living in Visalia, CA. This blew me away but either I recalled that Curt Siodmak, who lived near there in Three Rivers, CA had spoken at my high school or later he would speak -- probably the former or I would have asked him about it. Anyway, it seems like too much of a coincidence that Siodmak, who definitely live nearby Visalia was not inspired to use a similar-sounding name for his fictional town. The only thing is, I am not sure if he lived there before the Wolfman flicks although of course he could have lived there or simply encountered the name before making the movies.--Jrm2007 (talk) 13:10, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:1859 Russian novels has been nominated for discussion

Category:1859 Russian novels, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:06, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Request vote to keep or delete Walter Beer stub

Bellerophon5685: If you have a moment, could you please take a peek at the bio stub on Walter Beer and then share you vote for or against deletion here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Walter_Beer? While I would prefer you vote to keep the stub, your expertise in Wikipedia far outweighs mine... Gratefully --Aboudaqn (talk) 14:57, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Prints categories

Please let's have no more of these prints-by-year categories! They make it far too difficult for people coming down the prints tree to see what we actually have, and are all much too small to survive. Thanks, Johnbod (talk) 01:56, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

United Order of Tents

Hey, Dude... Found this redlink about THIS group and thought of you... best, —tim /// Carrite (talk) 15:05, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Deutsch-Ostafrikanische Zeitung

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Deutsch-Ostafrikanische Zeitung requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. 2602:306:3357:BA0:2592:E241:DE8:52FA (talk) 21:23, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Photographs by year

Have finished the category you started eg with [][:Category:2013 photographs]] Hugo999 (talk) 11:26, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Bellerophon5685. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Reviewing

Hello, Bellerophon5685.

As one of Wikipedia's most experienced Wikipedia editors,
Would you please consider becoming a New Page Reviewer? Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time but it requires a good understanding of Wikipedia policies and guidelines; currently Wikipedia needs experienced users at this task. (After gaining the flag, patrolling is not mandatory. One can do it at their convenience). But kindly read the tutorial before making your decision. Thanks. — Insertcleverphrasehere ^{(or here)} 09:03, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for Creation Reviewing

Hello, Bellerophon5685.

AfC submissions
Random submission

~6 weeks

1,021 pending submissions

Purge to update

I recently sent you an invitation to join NPP, but you also might be the right candidate for another related project, AfC, which is also extremely backlogged.
Would you please consider becoming an Articles for Creation reviewer? Articles for Creation reviewers help new users learn the ropes of creating their first articles, and identify whether topics are suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia. Reviewing drafts doesn't take much time but it requires a good understanding of Wikipedia inclusion policies and guidelines; currently Wikipedia needs experienced users at this task. (After requesting to be added to the project, reviewing is not mandatory. One can do it at their convenience). But kindly read the reviewing instructions before making your decision. Thanks. — Insertcleverphrasehere ^{(or here)} 02:28, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Photographs by year categories

Hi, I filled in the above categories, which you started, eg with Category:2013 photographs Hugo999 (talk) 11:31, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Words and phrases introduced in 1895 has been nominated for discussion

Category:Words and phrases introduced in 1895, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 04:56, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Prints by date

Please stop creating these categories. We don't have enough prints to justify them, and they are all vulnerable to deletion. By century is as far as we should go. Johnbod (talk) 19:32, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Visaria/Varasia

I note that you decided to redirect from the correctly-titled article "Visaria" to "Vasaria" on the somewhat spurious ground that you 'believed' the latter to be the corerct spelling. It might have been a good idea actually to check whether your belief had merit - e.g. by watching the movie "House of Frankenstein" (at 41'53" you will see a signpost for VISARIA), or any of the other movies wherein the town appears both verbalized by the locals and in writing. Wholly Minty (talk) 19:00, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Linda Wong (actress) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Linda Wong (actress). Since you had some involvement with the Linda Wong (actress) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 22:59, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Bellerophon5685. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Children's Lit WikiProject

Hi. I'm Barkeep49 and I am working to re-establish the Children's literature WikiProejct as an active project. It seems like you might be interested in (re)joining. If so I would encourage you to add your name back to the active members list. If you have any questions feel free to leave me a talk page message or ping me here. Otherwise I hope to see you around the project. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 16:32, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Robert McClenon. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Benjamin Fordyce Barker, and have marked it as unpatrolled. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

Robert McClenon (talk) 01:19, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Benjamin Fordyce Barker) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Benjamin Fordyce Barker.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Please be cautious when copying and pasting large chunks of free material with a very clearly biased point of view. Wikipedia doesn't use "qv" either, just link those names. Thoughtless copy-and-pasting doesn't necessarily build a quality encyclopedia.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Animalparty}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

--Animalparty! (talk) 01:41, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

spamming authority control

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Slatersteven (talk) 20:02, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations

		100000 Edits
		Congratulations on reaching 100000 edits. You have achieved a milestone that only 530 editors have been able to accomplish. The Wikipedia Community thanks you for your continuing efforts. Keep up the good work!

-- Dolotta (talk) 19:06, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Authority control

Please use edit summaries. It really helps monitoring watchlists and article histories. Thanks. Renata (talk) 02:56, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm also wondering whether it wouldn't be easier to have a bot do this. And I also wonder about the use of this. I've seen you add it to dozens of articles on academic journals, cluttering up my watchlist, but that template doesn't actually seem to do anything on those articles. --Randykitty (talk) 18:42, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

~~Seconded~~ Thirded. If I see an edit headed only "External links" I have to go and check in case some ****** **** has spammed a link to their brand-new sales website. If it says "added Authority Control" I roll over and go back to sleep. Please use some consideration for the volunteer time of other editors, and please follow this basic and helpful guideline.

I have no idea which tool you may be using, but it should be easy to add a standardised edit comment. If nothing else, once you have added "added Authority Control" once, you only have to type "a" in the summary box and the comment will pop up. Just a suggestion. Chiswick Chap (talk) 08:22, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

And I removed that template here where it did have an effect, but inserted a link to a music (!!) index that just had copied this very article. Wikidata imports that crap without any apparent oversight and puts it on our pages with this template. --Randykitty (talk) 08:49, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, can you please respond to the above? Why are you adding this template to articles like this if it has no visible effect? What are we missing? If you are adding these empty templates preemptively (per this) and no one else has already asked, please desist until there is consensus that this is how the template should be handled. I see no reason to spam book articles with authority control with the hopes that someone will add DNB or something to populate it later. (I see little reason to add it to a book article even when DNB is specified...) Please form consensus before continuing to systematically add this template. czar 04:19, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Due to your not answering the editors above, I will now rollback every edit you make with Authority control until you stop to talk. Markvs88 (talk) 00:47, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Centralize discussion here: Template talk:Authority control#Preemptive addition of template czar 01:20, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

My erroneous revert

Sorry, about that. I intended to revert an IP edit on a completely different article; I'd navigated to another page to confirm I didn't misunderstand his edit, then erroneously flipped back to the Angels tab instead, and reverted your edit in error. I went to self-revert with apology, but you beat me to the revert; so here's the apology. TJRC (talk) 02:49, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

February 2019

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Please see discussion at Template talk:Authority control#Preemptive addition of template. Randykitty (talk) 10:34, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Lennauchfilm. You are still adding authority control templates that have no discernable effect to articles, despite the long discussion telling you to first obtain consensus for these edits. The next time you do this, you will be blocked. Randykitty (talk) 10:42, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposal to rename category

Please see my proposal to speedily rename the below (and some others in associated categories e.g. Category:Food and drink introduced in the 19th-century:

Category:Typefaces and fonts introduced in 1900s to Category:Typefaces and fonts introduced in the 1900s: Hugo999 (talk) 01:25, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

British Encyclopedia

Hello. Are you happy for me to request an uncontroversial move of British Encyclopedia (disambiguation) to British Encyclopedia per WP:MALPLACED, and speedy deletion of British Encyclopedia (Disambiguation) (capital D) as a typo per WP:G6? Certes (talk) 15:24, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Certes:

Done. There is only one reference cited for British Encyclopaedia, which supports that spelling. However, the primary source, the encyclopedia itself, doesn't spell it that way. I don't think that article should move to British Encyclopedia though as that doesn't clearly distinguish this one from other similarly-titled encyclopedias and I don't feel that any could be considered to be WP:primary topic for the term. I'm considering a move of British Encyclopaedia to either The British Encyclopedia or Dictionary of Arts and Sciences or British Encyclopedia or Dictionary of Arts and Sciences. Not sure whether "The" should be part of the title (see WP:THE). – wbm1058 (talk) 18:08, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. A quick look for sources shows the "British Encyclopedia..." rather than "The British Encyclopedia...", so my kneejerk reaction is that you're right to omit "The" from the article title, but I'm not a subject expert. Certes (talk) 18:27, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I moved it to British Encyclopedia, or Dictionary of Arts and Sciences (with a comma, which I neglected to include in my suggestions above). I took the lack of response from Bellerophon5685 as no objection to the move. wbm1058 (talk) 14:48, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

== Iron arrow == - moved

Then should the cat Student societies in the United States be deleted too?--Bellerophon5685 (talk) 20:06, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

How, in your view, does the one relate to the other? X4n6 (talk) 20:29, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop editing the DYK nominations page

Bellerophon5685, for some reason you are trying to duplicate the DYK template for Mein Kampf in English on the Nominations page. You should only be transcluding it, and under the date you created the article, not today's date.

I've been attempting to fix it for you, but you keep editing again and again, and I'm not able to do so. Please stop your edits so I can fix things. Thank you. BlueMoonset (talk) 05:10, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, done. Thanks for your cooperation. You can find it under March 2. BlueMoonset (talk) 05:15, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Mein Kampf in English

On 30 March 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Mein Kampf in English, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Stackpole Books sold 12,000 copies of Mein Kampf in English before being ordered to stop? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Mein Kampf in English. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Mein Kampf in English), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 30 March 2019 (UTC) [reply]

Thank you! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:36, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Fictional elements introduced in 2003

A tag has been placed on Category:Fictional elements introduced in 2003 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. DannyS712 (talk) 01:06, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please see my proposal to upmerge categories

Category:Sports originating in the 2010s back to 1970s Hugo999 (talk) 04:34, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Username

Hi there.

You say you're named after President Bush. Random question, what do the numbers represent in your user name? 😁

Cheers

Beeney :) Beeney xx (talk) 21:48, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Texas Youth Commission 1995 to 1998

There are many tycoons facilities not listed here. Why? CADDI ( child and adolescent development Inc.) Was 3 3 story buildings in the heart of 3rd ward owned by Grady who was in politics, racist, and very abusive. I stayed there. There were also kids on probation and regular Cps kids. Most teens in 90'swere put in tyc if they had no family to go to. On my 23rd time running away( I was an honor student in school never any trouble n taught Sunday school without family attending, dad was an atheist, racist, abusive drunk, mom wrote me check for 50 bucks food. Joint account, my scared of dad n I got forgery. Crazy. I don't remember having a lawyer. I said do whatever u have to do so I don't go home. Thought it'd be better. I was wrong. Left in addict in middle of summer no air w a yeast infection bladder infection to top. There was never anyone to complain too. A lady came like a ttc caseworker but we were never allowed alone w her. Owner had us passing out campaign flyers. Gang members hired as staff. They had sex w clients, cops were called for gang fights, Cps girls broke bones. Think the abuse on cos girls got it closes down finally. Tyc kids never had anyone. I chose to go to tuck bc they told teens it pays for college. My probation officer Becky basham didn't know what tyc was. There needs to be a real listing of what happens. Kids were told we had NO rights. I was choked, bullied, hit on, and always talked down to especially bc I was white, smart, and most kids there were a bit younger n couldn't read. RebeccaLynnDavison (talk) 12:25, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Burmese animation

A tag has been placed on Category:Burmese animation requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:32, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to WikiProject Socialism

Thank you for your recent contributions to one of Wikipedia's socialism articles. Did you know there's a WikiProject for editors interested in writing about socialism? If you would like to join, simply click the Join WikiProject button on the WikiProject Socialism page. If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask at the WikiProject Socialism talk page.

We look forward to working with you in the future! MarioGom (talk) 09:56, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Album series introduced in 2007 has been nominated for discussion

Category:Album series introduced in 2007, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 03:52, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Film categories

Hi. Please see WP:FILMCAT. Note that all film articles have the primary categories of year, county and language. Therefore, please do not remove the top-level year category. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 16:42, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please STOP removing the year category, per the above. I see you have few to no edits on user talkpages to discuss issues, so if this continues, I'm afraid it'll go to WP:ANI, with the possibility of your account being blocked. Please see WP:ENGAGE for more. If you have a question about the film categories, please feel free to post on my talkpage, or ask for guidance at the Film Project. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 16:51, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't understand what you meant in the first message. I will keep the generic year cats for now on. Didn't know that was a policy.--Bellerophon5685 (talk) 16:58, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Authority control again

Regarding your edits at Germanico in Germania (here and here) and at Les élémens (here and here): as has been pointed out to you before, please consult Help:Show preview – it's not difficult to use, but it can be very helpful to prevent editors' mistakes, or unnecessary edits. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 04:49, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This talk page is becoming very long. Consider archiving inactive discussions.

On and off again. FCOL, read and follow Help:Show preview. Also, considering archiving this talk page because at >230kB it's getting very long. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 06:42, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Typefaces and fonts established in 1974

A tag has been placed on Category:Typefaces and fonts established in 1974 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:16, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sources needed for Days of the Year pages

You're probably not aware of this change, but Days of the Year pages are no longer exempt from WP:V and direct sources are required for additions. For details see the content guideline, the WikiProject Days of the Year style guide or the edit notice on any DOY page. Please do not add new additions to these pages without direct sources as the burden to provide them is on the editor who adds or restores material to these pages. Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 20:03, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Food and drink introduced in 2005

A tag has been placed on Category:Food and drink introduced in 2005 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 04:44, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Board Girls

Having an episode of South Park labeled as transphobic by a very biased non-neutral magazine and then having that article agreed upon by a similarly biased trans athlete is very non-notable and thus fails GNG. If you wish to debate this further please do so on the article’s talk page, not mine. - SanAnMan (talk) 12:12, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Fictional elements introduced in 1973

A tag has been placed on Category:Fictional elements introduced in 1973 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 04:55, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Anastasia (1997 film) has been nominated for discussion

Category:Anastasia (1997 film), which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Clarityfiend (talk) 20:12, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Communist parties in Palestine (pre-1948) has been nominated for discussion

Category:Communist parties in Palestine (pre-1948), which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. GreyShark (dibra) 13:17, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Writing systems introduced in 1947

A tag has been placed on Category:Writing systems introduced in 1947 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 01:43, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Writing systems introduced in 1956

A tag has been placed on Category:Writing systems introduced in 1956 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 01:47, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Starfire (comics, sci-fi charecter)" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Starfire (comics, sci-fi charecter). Since you had some involvement with the Starfire (comics, sci-fi charecter) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 13:06, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Fictional elements introduced in 1995

A tag has been placed on Category:Fictional elements introduced in 1995 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:06, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Are you from kerala, India Avinraju (talk) 03:28, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:International bodies of Pentecostal denominations

A tag has been placed on Category:International bodies of Pentecostal denominations requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 02:02, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Structure of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union

Category:Structure of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union has been nominated for merging with Category:Organization of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union. You are encouraged to join the discussion on the Categories for discussion page. Place Clichy (talk) 14:49, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Typefaces and fonts introduced in 2016

A tag has been placed on Category:Typefaces and fonts introduced in 2016 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:26, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Lower Silesian Provinzialtag elections in the Weimar Republic

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Lower Silesian Provinzialtag elections in the Weimar Republic requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Koridas (...Puerto Rico for statehood!) 21:22, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Supreme Council of Antiquities, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Mohammad Ibrahim and Ali Hassan. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Lower Silesian Provinzialtag elections in the Weimar Republic for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lower Silesian Provinzialtag elections in the Weimar Republic is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lower Silesian Provinzialtag elections in the Weimar Republic until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Koridas 📣 02:15, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Catholic scholar's wikipage being targeted

Hello, Bellerophon5685. You have new messages at Prauls901's talk page.
Message added 03:49, 8 August 2020 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pishon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kell.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:21, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Companies established in the 1550s

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Category:Companies established in the 1550s requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2016_June_13#Category:Companies_established_in_578. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Le Deluge (talk) 11:37, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 15

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Cayman Baptist Association

added a link pointing to Sobey

Man Walking Around a Corner

added a link pointing to David Wilkinson

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:18, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Fictional elements introduced in 1936

A tag has been placed on Category:Fictional elements introduced in 1936 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:29, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 22

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cayman Baptist Association, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sobey.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:21st-century speeches

A tag has been placed on Category:21st-century speeches requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:46, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation

Hello, Bellerophon5685! I saw you recently edited a page related to the Green party and green politics. There is a WikiProject that has been formed - WikiProject Green Politics and I thought this might be something you'd be interested in joining! So please head on over to the project page and take a look! Thanks for your time.

Me-123567-Me (talk) 22:01, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Page length

Your talk page currently has 263.8kB of markup; please archive most of it. If you would like a bot to do that, and to archive it regularly, let me know and I will set that up for you. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 11:33, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Pigsonthewing: Please set up the archiving bot for me on my user talk page as I've tried to do it but gave up trying. Cheers! TY! --The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 13:10, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Pigsonthewing: Could you show me where the archive bot is and how I can add it?--Bellerophon5685 (talk) 15:20, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User:lowercase sigmabot III; for example: [6]; [7]. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 16:26, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

CFD for neologisms categories

Some of the categories, which you have created are proposed for renaming. You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2020 October 4 § Neologisms, words and phases introduced in time periods. —⁠andrybak (talk) 01:24, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 11

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bishop's Palace, Galveston, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sacred Heart Church.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:26, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Food and drink introduced in 1974

A tag has been placed on Category:Food and drink introduced in 1974 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:56, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:States-Provincial of the Netherlands has been nominated for renaming

Category:States-Provincial of the Netherlands has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 16:46, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 5

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Killer Tomatoes Strike Back, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Frank Davis.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:15, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Archive request?

Hi there. I saw that you had a conversation with Andy in September about setting up an archive bot. Do you still want that to happen? I will happily do so for you if you want. Do you have any preferences about:

How old conversations have to be
How large archives will be
How many conversations will be left on your talk page
How many conversations minimum will be archived?

If you don't have any preferences, that doesn't matter. Sdrqaz (talk) 18:16, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

US Fraternal Organizations

With other likeminded individuals we are building a website for the study an preservation of American Fraternal Organizations: hsaf.org I noticed you've create a great many pages and gathered impressive amounts of information for fraternal wiki pages. I am wondering if you may wish to help, aid, or assist the HSAF. I am the curator at the GW Masonic National Memorial and author of "American Freemasonry: Three Centuries of Building Communities." You may contact me at philnblank@hotmail.com Thank you and thank you for your excellent contributions to Wikipedia Sincerely Mark Tabbert — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:8806:3103:2700:26:BDC9:AA2E:B6AE (talk) 12:39, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gene Roddenberry filmography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Police Story.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:53, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited George Lucas filmography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Glut.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1879 establishments in South Africa

A tag has been placed on Category:1879 establishments in South Africa indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 13:24, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1880 disestablishments in South Africa

A tag has been placed on Category:1880 disestablishments in South Africa indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:46, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1948 video games

A tag has been placed on Category:1948 video games indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:22, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo of the NSLF.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Logo of the NSLF.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:26, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I am editing the Digitization page for a grad school project and I am going to be removing the edits you made on the Digitization versus digital preservation section. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Digitization&diff=prev&oldid=978935984 There are no citations and I believe the material would work better on the Digital Preservation page if it is fully cited. I haven't done anything yet, but will be on or around December 10, 2021. Thank you. --Serialsgirl (talk) 02:39, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Food and drink introduced in 1972

A tag has been placed on Category:Food and drink introduced in 1972 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:54, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John Lawrence, 2nd Baron Lawrence, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Richard Campbell and Alexander Lawrence.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Socialist Party of Colorado for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Socialist Party of Colorado is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Socialist Party of Colorado until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Toa Nidhiki05 18:54, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1915 Canadian novels

A tag has been placed on Category:1915 Canadian novels indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:41, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1772 documents

A tag has been placed on Category:1772 documents indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:17, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Adventures of Superboy

The article The Adventures of Superboy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Current sources are not reliable. As the show never finished production, it is unlikely that any reliable sources exist

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 03:39, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Adventures of Superboy for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Adventures of Superboy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Adventures of Superboy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 15:20, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Computer-related introductions in 1842

A tag has been placed on Category:Computer-related introductions in 1842 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:18, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Hitler, Adolf 1889-1945" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Hitler, Adolf 1889-1945 and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 9#Hitler, Adolf 1889-1945 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. TraderCharlotte (talk) 00:54, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Games and sports introduced in 1901

A tag has been placed on Category:Games and sports introduced in 1901 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:38, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Usage in camouflage articles and notability

Howdy,

I’d like your take on describing the usage of various military camouflage patterns on their respective articles. I’ve always been under the impression that in the interests of summarization, we should restrict this sort of descriptions to b) national armies, and b) major political-military factions involved in an armed conflict. Personally, I don’t believe that we need to describe the use of these patterns by every last private non-state actor and entity but wanted more opinions on this. What are your thoughts? Katangais (talk) 10:42, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:14th century in Greenland

A tag has been placed on Category:14th century in Greenland indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:30, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year, Bellerophon5685!

Happy New Year!

Bellerophon5685,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
— Moops ^⋠T⋡ 02:53, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

— Moops ^⋠T⋡ 02:53, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Stephen Slesinger, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William George.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tuhfat Ul Mujahideen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Marxian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"SUPREME BEING" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect SUPREME BEING has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 May 6 § SUPREME BEING until a consensus is reached. Veverve (talk) 01:21, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Pan-American sports governing bodies has been nominated for merging

Category:Pan-American sports governing bodies has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Kaffet i halsen (talk) 17:51, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Greek chronicles has been nominated for renaming

Category:Greek chronicles has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 11:58, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Gotham Gazette (disambiguation)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Gotham Gazette (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either

disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 14:47, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Sports clubs and teams established in 1836

A tag has been placed on Category:Sports clubs and teams established in 1836 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:38, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Sports clubs and teams established in 1841

A tag has been placed on Category:Sports clubs and teams established in 1841 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:39, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Elizabeth I, Queen of England, 1533-1603" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Elizabeth I, Queen of England, 1533-1603 has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 July 30 § Elizabeth I, Queen of England, 1533-1603 until a consensus is reached. estar8806 (talk) ★ 23:34, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New message from Narutolovehinata5

Hello, Bellerophon5685. You have new messages at Template:Did you know nominations/Child abduction scare of 2002.
Message added 13:05, 3 September 2023 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 13:05, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:1453 natural disasters has been nominated for deletion

Category:1453 natural disasters has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –Aidan721 (talk) 18:31, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Phantom islands of the Atlantic has been nominated for renaming

Category:Phantom islands of the Atlantic has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Clarityfiend (talk) 04:21, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Games and sports introduced in 1896

A tag has been placed on Category:Games and sports introduced in 1896 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:22, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hippolyta, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pseudo-Hyginus.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1835 conferences

A tag has been placed on Category:1835 conferences indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:53, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:German-language newspapers published in the Americas

A tag has been placed on Category:German-language newspapers published in the Americas indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 15:40, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of D-Day -1

The article D-Day -1 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced since 2007, a BEFORE check found nothing.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. QuicoleJR (talk) 23:20, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and hello@QuicoleJR

I redirected the page. Feel free to change that if you think I made a mistake. Best, -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 11:32, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reverted. Once a PROD has been added to an article, you should usually wait the full week before redirecting the article. Also, for future reference, you need to remove all of the content of an article when you make it a redirect. QuicoleJR (talk) 20:52, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again to you too,

this one week delay practice that you refer to would be based on what, if I may ask?

And I intentionally sometimes leave part of the content of deproded pages I redirect so that it can be more easily checked by others. But thank you for your input. Should you wish to discuss this further, I suggest you go to the article TP or at least elsewhere. Thank you -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 21:34, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

PROD is designed to wait one week before deleting or redirecting, according to WP:PROD. QuicoleJR (talk) 22:08, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:German-language newspapers published in the Americas has been nominated for merging

Category:German-language newspapers published in the Americas has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 23:56, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:German-language newspapers published in the Americas

A tag has been placed on Category:German-language newspapers published in the Americas indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:51, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Communism-based civil wars has been nominated for deletion

Category:Communism-based civil wars has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. User:Namiba 17:58, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:1812 German-language novels has been nominated for merging

Category:1812 German-language novels has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 01:48, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:1870 German-language novels has been nominated for merging

Category:1870 German-language novels has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 01:49, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:1881 German-language novels has been nominated for merging

Category:1881 German-language novels has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 01:49, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:1886 German-language novels has been nominated for merging

Category:1886 German-language novels has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 01:50, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:1889 German-language novels has been nominated for merging

Category:1889 German-language novels has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 01:52, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:1893 German-language novels has been nominated for merging

Category:1893 German-language novels has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 01:53, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:1902 German-language novels has been nominated for merging

Category:1902 German-language novels has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 01:56, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:1903 German-language novels has been nominated for merging

Category:1903 German-language novels has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 01:57, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:1905 German-language novels has been nominated for deletion

Category:1905 German-language novels has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 02:00, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited A.P.O. 923, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Officers Club.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:04, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 22

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited I Dream of Jeannie, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Airwave.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:06, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1975 establishments in Afghanistan

A tag has been placed on Category:1975 establishments in Afghanistan indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 14:51, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Precious anniversary

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:35, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Bulgarian encyclopedias has been nominated for splitting

Category:Bulgarian encyclopedias has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 19:42, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited M*A*S*H (TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Golden.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Master of the World (1961 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Alexander.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:15, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Damsel in distress, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Richard Ames.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:22, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Honoré Daumier, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page September Laws.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 20:00, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024 - Edit Summaries Needed

Hello Bellerophon5685 /Jonathan. I'm Quaerens-veritatem. Looking at some of your numerous edits, I was surprised that you usually don't provide edit summaries. While running up the number of edits, it doesn't take long to add summaries. Way back in February 2012 and December 2013 you were asked to provide edit summaries.

According to Wikipedia's consensus policy, all edits should be explained —either by clear edit summaries, or by discussion on the associated talk page.

Please provide a summary of every edit you make. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history. Summaries help other editors by (a) providing a reason for the edit, (b) saving the time to open up the edit to find out what it's all about, and (c) providing information about the edit on diff pages and lists of changes (such as page histories and watchlists). Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit and a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary.

If the edit is minor, the "This is a minor edit" box can be checked. See, Help:Minor_edit. A good rule of thumb is that only edits consisting solely of spelling corrections, formatting changes, or rearrangement of text without modification of the content may be flagged as minor edits.

Many who are ignorant of the Wikipedia policy on edit summaries fail to add them. Some ignore this basic brief task; however, failure seems arrogant and inconsiderate specially since summaries are so easy to add. Thank you for your consideration. Quaerens-veritatem (talk) 03:33, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bible translations into Indo-European languages

The article Bible translations into Indo-European languages has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Complete WP:SYNTH that fails WP:GNG. Not useful as navigation or a split since this page is an orphan.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Food and drink introduced in 1952

A tag has been placed on Category:Food and drink introduced in 1952 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 11:04, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to participate in a research

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:27, 23 October 2024 (UTC) [reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Star Trek: Excelsior

A tag has been placed on Category:Star Trek: Excelsior indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:34, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]