User talk:BlueSquadronRaven
|
|
Adrian Dix content
[edit]Hey BlueSquadronRaven. Not sure if you are aware, but there is a discussion going on about the content you re-added on Talk:Adrian Dix. There's been a bit of edit warring over that content, and by re-adding it, you're continuing that cycle. Discussion is the best way forward. Also, take a look at the paragraph after you added your content. It now repeats itself, and has no chronological order. The Interior (Talk) 15:22, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
Opinion
[edit]Hi, i would like to have your opinion about a discussion which i started here, thank.Kingroyos (talk) 23:02, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Elemental Axes
[edit]
The article Elemental Axes has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- No evidence of WP:NOTABILITY
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 11:54, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Userbox color
[edit]Hi, I saw you reverted my edit on the userbox for Arsenal-supporters so I thought I should talk to you. I usually dont have any problem with colors and I am not colorblind, but the "gold" color on red is really hard to see. Also Arsenal is red and white so what is wrong with having Arsenal in white? Qed237 (talk) 21:24, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- I understand that the fold is used in the canon but it is currently really hard to see the text. Qed237 (talk) 10:47, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
- How about making it a bit more like gold, FFD700 (is hex for gold)? Qed237 (talk) 10:57, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
- That is your choice, I can always drag up WP:COLOR and all kinds of guidelines because that color on the red is no good. Qed237 (talk) 23:47, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
- The interesting here is that you claim ownership of something you did not create, looking at the userbox history it was created by User:Andy before you moved it to your userspace and called it yours. I am definately considering taking this forward for community discussions as it is not yours (yet you claim ownership). Qed237 (talk) 10:56, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
- That is your choice, I can always drag up WP:COLOR and all kinds of guidelines because that color on the red is no good. Qed237 (talk) 23:47, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]
Hello, BlueSquadronRaven. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
June 12, 2019 edit-a-thon at "Atla Annual 2019" in Vancouver British Columbia
[edit]| 1000 Women in Religion: A Wikipedia edit-a-thon at "Atla Annual 2019" in Vancouver, British Columbia | |
|---|---|
 The 1000 Women in Religion Project is working to improve the coverage of women’s contributions to religious, spiritual and wisdom traditions worldwide. In support of this goal, the edit-a-thon at Atla's (formerly the American Theological Library Association) annual meeting will focus on improving articles about women in religion. We would love to have a few Vancouver area Wikipedians to help us get new editors oriented and editing!! 8:00am-12:00pm Sheraton Vancouver Wall Centre 1088 Burrard Street, Vancouver, British Columbia V6Z 2R9 Canada
| |
Dzingle1 (talk) 22:48, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
Protection Expiry Date.....
[edit].....is set a bit too long on article Petr Čech by an admin. There occured an edit warring on the page of Petr in which the admins were found to be at fault at the very end. It all started when an IP address added a previously supported statement in the article but the other editors couldn't find the citations and this misunderstanding led to a mild edit war. But an admin i think, set the protection expiry date a bit too long i think. It will expire on 23rd August. I will like to advise you to please reset the expiry date to 23rd June. I know this is exclusive to your interests but it is an administrative work. Regards 117.234.145.88 (talk) 04:27, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
- As I am not an admin, did not witness the edit war, and am not terribly familiar with the subject of the article, I will be taking no action. Perhaps you should discuss this with the admin who protected the page, or the ArbCom. BlueSquadronRaven 05:04, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:WikiProject Battlestar Galactica
[edit]
Template:WikiProject Battlestar Galactica has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 13:13, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/5D DVD until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Tommy has a great username (talk) 15:32, 24 February 2022 (UTC)