User talk:Dragons flight

About my health

About three weeks ago I was diagnosed with Burkitt's lymphoma, a rare type of white blood cell cancer. The diagnosis was made in the early stages, and the prognosis is relatively good (at least as cancer prognoses goes).

However, I have a long road to recovery involving surgery and chemotherapy that is expected to take multiple months. During that time, there will likely be periods where chemo has me down and I may be unavailable for extended periods of time. There will also likely be periods of time where I am feeling relatively well (like right now) and may choose to contribute to Wikipedia, as I enjoy it and they encourage chemo patients to stay mentally engaged. However, my participation and responsiveness to inquiries is likely to be very hit and miss over the next several months.

If anyone wants to, a friend and coworker set up a donation page to support my costs during treatment [1], but I'm not expecting anything from anyone here and already have pretty good health insurance and good support.

Thank you for your understanding, and I look forward to beating this thing.

Robert Rohde aka Dragons flight (talk) 19:13, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

I wish the very best to you and I hope you are able to defeat the cancer. It is completely understandable why you might have to disengage from Wikipedia for a while; when you return full time, it will be celebration for the project, as we'll have you back again, and more importantly, a celebration for yourself, as it'll mean you're well again. All the best, Dragons flight, all the best. Acalamari 22:27, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

Best of luck! I am lucky not to have any such personal experience, but I recall a friend that fought some cancer for decades. There were bad years, and there were good quiet decades, but she did a lot of good stuff in between - and a few not so good, don't we all? :). And she never, ever, 'was' her disease, she was always herself. That we can fight to control. I hope I can do the same if needed someday, and again, wish you all the best. - Nabla (talk) 22:50, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

Thinking of you with sympathy and hope. Among all your more important contributions to this project and this community, I've never forgotten the effort you made to do this. With my appreciation and very best regards and wishes. Ira Brad Matetsky, Newyorkbrad (talk) 22:59, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

Good luck with your treatment and recovery! I'm sure this must be a trying time for you and it's completely understandable that you would need to take some time off from Wikipedia. If there are any articles that you would like us to keep an eye on while you're gone, just ask. Hope to see you back soon! Kaldari (talk) 01:03, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

<3 Keegan (talk) 21:52, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

Sorry to hear you've been dealing with this. Strength and healing go with you, and hoping for a speedy recovery <3 - Alison ^❤ 22:05, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

Hi Robert! This is not happy news. I wish you a speedy and complete recovery! --Stephan Schulz (talk) 22:58, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

Thanks, everyone. It's a slow process but I am trying to stay positive and keep my eye on the goal. Dragons flight (talk) 11:52, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

• I wish you a speedy recovery --In actu (Guerillero) | My Talk 13:58, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

I am thinking of you and yours and wishing you health and fortitude. best, Keilana (talk) 18:33, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

Update

It has now been about two months since I posted about my cancer here (and about three months since the initial diagnosis).

After 2 surgeries and 6 in-patient chemotherapy treatments, I am happy to say that I am now recovering at home. Burkitt's lymphoma is one of the relatively "good" forms of cancer, and >80% patients in my position can expect to be fully cured. There will be a substantial period of rest and recovery, as well as a long period of monitoring for potential relapse, but I am optimistic about the future and being able to get on with my life.

Thank you to everyone for your support. Dragons flight (talk) 12:01, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

Good to hear you are on the mend. —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 12:41, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

This is very welcome! I wish you a speedy rest-recovery! --Stephan Schulz (talk) 12:43, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

Super news! Delighted to hear you're well on the road to recovery :) - Alison ^❤ 08:50, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

Great, hope to see you back here then.! Doug Weller talk 12:30, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

Welcome home. Glad you're better. A Train^talk 06:53, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

ITN recognition for Maryam Mirzakhani

On 15 July 2017, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Maryam Mirzakhani, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Spencer^T♦C 23:01, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

Template:Editnotice load

I'm here per this comment, can you change the page protection of {{Editnotice load}} to template protection. Thank you, - FlightTime (open channel) 01:12, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

Invitation to Admin confidence survey

Hello,

Beginning in September 2017, the Wikimedia Foundation Anti-harassment tool team will be conducting a survey to gauge how well tools, training, and information exists to assist English Wikipedia administrators in recognizing and mitigating things like sockpuppetry, vandalism, and harassment.

The survey should only take 5 minutes, and your individual response will not be made public. This survey will be integral for our team to determine how to better support administrators.

To take the survey sign up here and we will send you a link to the form.

We really appreciate your input!

Please let us know if you wish to opt-out of all massmessage mailings from the Anti-harassment tools team.

For the Anti-harassment tools team, SPoore (WMF), Community Advocate, Community health initiative (talk) 19:52, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

ITN recognition for 2017 Las Vegas Strip shooting

On 2 October 2017, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2017 Las Vegas Strip shooting, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. BorgQueen (talk) 11:06, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

--BorgQueen (talk) 11:06, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Dragons flight. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Precious anniversary

Precious

Three years!

... and best wishes for your health and well-being! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:45, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

... and four years, with best wishes --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:44, 9 December 2018 (UTC)

... and five ... --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:55, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Module:PassArguments

Module:PassArguments has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the module's entry on the Templates for discussion page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pppery (talk • contribs) 15:41, 28 April 2018 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Module:Switch

Module:Switch has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the module's entry on the Templates for discussion page. {{3x|p}}ery (talk) 16:01, 28 April 2018 (UTC)

Post-Glacial Sea Level Rise

Dear Robert, if You are in fact the author of the "Post-Glacial Sea Level Rise" graph (which I have on my PC since its first publication), I now would suggest to concrete the time reference "ago" to "b2k", which You probably know from the Greenland Ice core data (which I also all have on my PC), as published by the Danish team. "b2k" naturally means "before the year 2000" and would at least roughly relate to the date of the used data, otherwise becoming more and more mistaken. The correction would make the information correct and independent of the actual date. Thanks in advance and best wishes for your health! Hans J. Holm (see academia.edu/Researgate.net/google Scholar for references). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2003:DD:F13:11E9:9C2B:CACF:CD1:DDB1 (talk) 13:26, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Module:Citation

Module:Citation has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the module's entry on the Templates for discussion page. {{3x|p}}ery (talk) 16:20, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Module:ExpandCitations

Module:ExpandCitations has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the module's entry on the Templates for discussion page. {{3x|p}}ery (talk) 00:25, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

New global warming art

Hello Robert,

Today I started a new page with the objective of improving figures on the topic of climate change. I've been wanting to do this for a couple of years, but the high quality of the current images has put me off so far. However, I do feel it is important to have updates of the most important images related to global warming. If I understand it correctly, you have made a lot of the figures ten years ago. I was wondering if you want to contribute to the update of those images or give me advise on how to tackle this daunting task.

You have used a lot of data sets. Were you able to access them publicly or did you have to contact authors of papers yourself? Did you find review articles for the data or did you make an overview of available records yourself? Femkemilene (talk) 09:57, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

Yes, I made several dozen images 10-15 years ago. Some of those ended up in Wikipedia. Eventually, I found that other demands on my time were too large and I stopped working on it. (A decision that was made easier by how often Wikimedia Commons violated my copyright by reposting material without any indication of my authorship.) More recently, I have been making some new images in the last year or two, which mostly appear on my twitter feed (https://twitter.com/rarohde). A few of those may be relevant to Wikipedia. I would be happy discuss updates and provide pointers. Maybe I would even contribute materials now and again, but I'm not so sure. I do have original materials for some of the images (but not all due to a computer failure years ago). Most of the referenced datasets are available publicly, though there are a few where I communicated with authors directly to get copies of their published data. I'm a professional climate scientist, so I am familiar with a wide range of data. How I chose sources varied on a case-by-case basis and I couldn't really say in general whether I was looking at review papers or individual works. Dragons flight (talk) 11:29, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

Thank you very much for your quick reply. Apparently, I was following you on Twitter already, so I've seen much of those images before. I really liked the figure on the evolution of humanities energy system. I wasn't aware that Wikipedia Commons reposts the images stored there itself, but constant violation of copyright sounds like quite a pain. I see that you use both GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported. Could you maybe tell me what the difference is?

Fyi: I'm going to start this project together with a climate scientist working with at the Royal Meteorological Institute. I started a PhD on climate change recently myself.

We'd be very much interested in original materials. I assume that the software used for the creation of these images is now obsolete, so it's best to make the figures ourselves? For many figures, it will simply be an update on the figures from 10-15 years. Since the figures will contain new data and will look somewhat differently, I assume it's best to upload them not as a new version, but instead as a new figure with a reference (proper attribution) to the old version. Femkemilene (talk) 16:35, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

P.S. I noticed that the external links in your template for GWArt (and GWArtOld) are not working anymore.

The images were mostly created in Matlab. For some I could probably find the original code and data, though in many cases it might be better to track down more recent data / sources. If there are particular images you want to know more about and/or get code, let me know. At the very least, I could probably answer questions about the images if something is unclear. In some cases, the Matlab outputs were manually edited in Illustrator or other programs before the final format was created. (Incidentally, In hindsight, I don't recommend manually editing files because it only makes things harder to update later.)

Several years ago, I ran a site "Global Warming Art" that hosted all of these files and more, but I found that maintaining the site was taking too much of my time. So eventually I stopped maintaining it. That's why the external link is dead now.

Incidentally, I do enjoy making graphics like those, but it can get burdensome. It was mostly an unfunded side project from my grad school days, and it was hard to maintain the energy over time. In a hypothetical world where I actually had funding to work on climate science communication, this is something I would enjoy doing more of, especially if there was a team working on it. However, in my current life I need to focus on research, and other things.

Who are you working with at RMI?

For truly new works, I would suggest licensing as CC-BY 4.0 or CC-BY-SA 4.0. For updated works, it is probably better to use the same licensing as the existing works. If you really want to get into licensing, I could have a long discussion about this and the various pros / cons, but perhaps not right now. In some ways, the GFDL licensing on the images now is a legacy of the original GFDL licensing on Wikipedia, but even that is complicated.

As you may be aware, it is now common for most images to be hosted on Wikimedia Commons. That is typical today, though 10 years ago there was still a mixture of Commons hosted and locally hosted materials. Unfortunately, having materials hosted on Commons makes them harder to manage from the point of view of vandalism, since changes to Commons' description pages are not visible on user watchlists on the individual projects. Nevertheless most things have been moved to Commons (save fair use images). Personally, I've found the Commons community annoying to work with. People complain if your description page includes a lot of text, even though that is often necessary to describe complex figures. People complain if your charts aren't in SVG format, even if SVG versions don't look nice. (I've repeatedly had people create shitty-looking SVG conversions, replace all the image usages, and not even bother to acknowledge the original authorship or licensing.) Purists complain if there is text on the diagrams (even axis labels, etc.). I understand the argument for supporting multi-lingual versions, but I will still argue that unlabeled diagrams are harder on readers. Not to mention that irresponsible people working on Commons have a bad habit of creating derivative works (e.g. other languages, other formats, etc.) without acknowledging the original authorship or licensing. (Or argue that "it is just a graph" and hence authorship doesn't matter.)

Okay, that last part was a bit too much of a rant, but frankly I found the attitude and behaviors of some people on Commons grew to be exhausting. Even if the goal is to provide updated materials to Wikipedia, I would recommend having an authoritative version and description hosted somewhere off-wiki that reflects your personal best work. If you have a good way to do so, and wish to do so, providing code and data could also be useful to people. Best wishes and good luck. Dragons flight (talk) 20:27, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

Thank you very much for all the information and the rant :P. Unfortunately, I'm a disaster with Matlab.

I've made my contribution to Commons with an update of the CO2 concentrations, including a reference to your figure in the description. The python code I made available on GitHub, with a very easy language switch, so that people that don't understand python can still make their own language version. Hope that will help in keeping the Commons community content. I think you're right that figures should include some text to make it clear immediately what the figure is about.

At RMI, I'm working with Lesley de Cruz. She's now involved in a project around paleoclimate, so she should have access to most interesting data. Femkemilene (talk) 12:59, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Module:ISBN

Module:ISBN has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the module's entry on the Templates for discussion page. {{3x|p}}ery (talk) 22:05, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of AMResorts for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article AMResorts is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AMResorts until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rathfelder (talk) 17:27, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:AMResorts logo.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:AMResorts logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:09, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

Template: Cite journal - mistaken use

Hi Dragons flight, I encountered a very far-spread problem with the use of the "volume" parameter of the Cite jounal template. According to the docs, the parameter expects an entry like "Volume four", "Vol. 4", "Band VII", etc. If anything shorter than 4 characters is entered, this is printed in bold text in the citation, to mark the mistake.

Nearly all uses of the template seem to ignore this. The result is a host of Volume descriptors, that are nothing but bold printed numbers. This could lead to misunderstandings and confusion among users trying to find the cited journal. For an impression of the extent of the mistaken use, look at Candide#Sources, for example. Or really any article citing lots of journals.

I'm adressing you, as you made the last major update to the template, in 2013. Perhaps you can help or direct me to the right place on WP for this. 2.247.243.131 (talk) 16:06, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

The examples given on the template page show clearly that a number is expected and, as is commonly the style, the volume number is intentionally in bold. This is not a mistake, as the examples make clear. Mikenorton (talk) 16:13, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

Are you really sure about that? Ok. Then there is no problem. Thanks. 2.247.243.131 (talk) 16:24, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Dragons flight. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Dragons flight. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Rounding templates nominated for merging

{{Round}}, {{rnd}}, and {{decimals}} have been nominated for merging. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. — JJMC89 (T·C) 07:23, 15 December 2018 (UTC)

List of The Simpsons TV ads listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect List of The Simpsons TV ads. Since you had some involvement with the List of The Simpsons TV ads redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 05:10, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 special circular

Administrators must secure their accounts The Arbitration Committee may require a new RfA if your account is compromised. Use strong, unique passwords for your Wikipedia account and associated email Change your password now if your Wikipedia account password or email password is reused on another website, exposed, or weak Enable two-factor authentication now for improved security

View additional information

Why have I received this message? All administrators are receiving it. What prompted you to send this message? Recently, several Wikipedia admin accounts were compromised. The admin accounts were desysopped on an emergency basis. In the past, the Committee often resysopped admin accounts as a matter of course once the admin was back in control of their account. The committee has updated its guidelines. Admins may now be required to undergo a fresh Request for Adminship (RfA) after losing control of their account. What do I need to do? Only to follow the instructions in this message. Check that your password is unique (not reused across sites). Check that your password is strong (not simple or guessable). Enable Two-factor authentication (2FA), if you can, to create a second hurdle for attackers. How can I find out more about two-factor authentication (2FA)? You can find out more about 2FA at m:2FA.

This message was sent to all administrators following a recent motion. Thank you for your attention. For the Arbitration Committee, Cameron11598 02:16, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

Administrator account security (Correction to Arbcom 2019 special circular)

ArbCom would like to apologise and correct our previous mass message in light of the response from the community.

Since November 2018, six administrator accounts have been compromised and temporarily desysopped. In an effort to help improve account security, our intention was to remind administrators of existing policies on account security — that they are required to "have strong passwords and follow appropriate personal security practices." We have updated our procedures to ensure that we enforce these policies more strictly in the future. The policies themselves have not changed. In particular, two-factor authentication remains an optional means of adding extra security to your account. The choice not to enable 2FA will not be considered when deciding to restore sysop privileges to administrator accounts that were compromised.

We are sorry for the wording of our previous message, which did not accurately convey this, and deeply regret the tone in which it was delivered.

For the Arbitration Committee, -Cameron11598 21:03, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

Today's Wikipedian 10 years ago

Awesome

Ten years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:55, 23 June 2019 (UTC)

Woohooo

Hey, Dragons flight. I'd like to wish you a wonderful First Edit Day on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! Mjs1991 (talk) 01:05, 4 August 2019 (UTC)

I'm looking for a new free-use diagram showing global warming attribution/causation

I've discovered your graphic, File:Climate Change Attribution.png, and added it to the Global warming article after some discussion on its talk page. Are you aware of any similar but more recent free-use graphics, by you or by others? Thanks for all your skilled and hard work. Best wishes. —RCraig09 (talk) 20:51, 8 October 2019 (UTC)

Update: : I've just discovered at https://science2017.globalchange.gov/chapter/3/ two "attribution" charts (probably public domain from U.S. government Fourth National Climate Assessment), similar to what I want:

• https://science2017.globalchange.gov/img/figure/figure3_1.png (right side; has clutter)
• https://science2017.globalchange.gov/img/figure/figure3_3.png (separate charts take up space)

If you know of one more similar to your earlier chart, please let us know below. —RCraig09 (talk) 22:24, 8 October 2019 (UTC)

Update: I've just created File:2017 Global warming attribution - based on NCA4 Fig 3.3.png. Pending other editors' comments, I think that the new chart will meet the needs for an updated attribution chart. But if you know of something better, of course feel free to suggest. Thanks, and best wishes. —RCraig09 (talk) 17:56, 12 October 2019 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Module:ParsePage

Module:ParsePage has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the module's entry on the Templates for discussion page. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 01:54, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of List of scientists who disagree with the scientific consensus on global warming for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of scientists who disagree with the scientific consensus on global warming is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of scientists who disagree with the scientific consensus on global warming until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Nblund ^talk 21:26, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:03, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Pages with bad rounding precision

A tag has been placed on Category:Pages with bad rounding precision requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 01:16, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Module:Citation/testcases

Module:Citation/testcases has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the module's entry on the Templates for discussion page. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 01:43, 11 February 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for merging of Module:HelloWorld

Module:HelloWorld has been nominated for merging with Module:Example. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the module's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 22:24, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

Happy First Edit Day!

Happy First Edit Day, Dragons flight, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 06:58, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

Happy Adminship Anniversary!

Wishing Dragons flight a very flight happy adminship anniversary on behalf of the Birthday Committee! Best wishes! Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 07:20, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Module:RenderProfile

Module:RenderProfile has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the module's entry on the Templates for discussion page. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 16:54, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Bad Ref Edit.png

The file File:Bad Ref Edit.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused free use image with no clear use on the Wiki.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. fuzzy510 (talk) 08:27, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Module:Gradient

Module:Gradient has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the module's entry on the Templates for discussion page. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 15:12, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:14, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Module:Citation/CS1/Arguments

Module:Citation/CS1/Arguments has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 00:25, 26 November 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Citation/COinS2

Template:Citation/COinS2 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Elli (talk | contribs) 06:30, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of List of authors of Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of authors of Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of authors of Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

FemkeMilene (talk) 17:40, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

Happy First Edit Day!

Happy First Edit Day, Dragons flight, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:48, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

Happy Adminship Anniversary!

Wishing Dragons flight a very flight happy adminship anniversary on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:59, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Citation/core2

Template:Citation/core2 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Izno (talk) 00:31, 31 August 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Citation/core3

Template:Citation/core3 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Izno (talk) 00:31, 31 August 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Cite AV media/old

Template:Cite AV media/old has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Did Q28 make a mess today? 05:32, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Cite map/old

Template:Cite map/old has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Did Q28 make a mess today? 05:34, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Cite conference/old

Template:Cite conference/old has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Did Q28 make a mess today? 05:35, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Foreigncopyrighttop

Template:Foreigncopyrighttop has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:28, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Foreigncopyrightbottom

Template:Foreigncopyrightbottom has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:28, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

Administrators will no longer be autopatrolled

A recently closed Request for Comment (RFC) reached consensus to remove Autopatrolled from the administrator user group. You may, similarly as with Edit Filter Manager, choose to self-assign this permission to yourself. This will be implemented the week of December 13th, but if you wish to self-assign you may do so now. To find out when the change has gone live or if you have any questions please visit the Administrator's Noticeboard. 20:05, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

Listing of Template:Citation/author block at templates for discussion

Template:Citation/author block has been listed at templates for discussion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. User:GKFX^talk 21:59, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Listing of Template:Citation/included work at templates for discussion

Template:Citation/included work has been listed at templates for discussion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. User:GKFX^talk 22:00, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

How we will see unregistered users

Hi!

You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.

When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.

Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.

If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.

We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.

Thank you. /Johan (WMF)

18:12, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Str find/logic

Template:Str find/logic has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 09:26, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Tfd-inline

Template:Tfd-inline has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. User:GKFX^talk 20:41, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Ratio with precision

Template:Ratio with precision has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 14:10, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Title disambig text/logic

Template:Title disambig text/logic has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 07:32, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

New administrator activity requirement

The administrator policy has been updated with new activity requirements following a successful Request for Comment.

Beginning January 1, 2023, administrators who meet one or both of the following criteria may be desysopped for inactivity if they have:

1. Made neither edits nor administrative actions for at least a 12-month period OR
2. Made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period

Administrators at risk for being desysopped under these criteria will continue to be notified ahead of time. Thank you for your continued work.

22:52, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Special:WantedTemplates

Hi, I was just cleaning up Special:WantedTemplates and found one of your pages. Would it be possible to fix this? Thanks! Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 16:59, 16 April 2022 (UTC)

Please vote in the 2022 Wikimedia Foundation Inc. Board of Trustees election

Hello hello. I hope this message finds you well.

The Wikimedia Foundation Inc. Board of Trustees election ends soon, please vote. At least one of the candidates is worthy of support. --MZMcBride (talk) 14:36, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Dark matter in fiction for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dark matter in fiction is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dark matter in fiction (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 05:06, 4 December 2022 (UTC)

Precious anniversary

Precious

Eight years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:46, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Trailingzeros

Template:Trailingzeros has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:04, 13 December 2022 (UTC)

Administrative permissions and inactivity reminder

This is a reminder that established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. You are receiving this annual reminder since you have averaged less than 50 edits per year over the last 5 years.

Inactive administrators are encouraged to reengage with the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to be engaged with the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 00:19, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Kallichore

The article Kallichore has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:2DABS with a clear primary topic; the moon no longer has a standalone article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 09:37, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:Edit filter/Current

Wikipedia:Edit filter/Current, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Edit filter/Current and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Edit filter/Current during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Galobtter (pingó mió) 07:11, 18 March 2023 (UTC)

A request re one of your xlnt graphics

Hello Robert — I hope this finds you well.

Would it be possible to invert the x-axis on your https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Phanerozoic_Sea_Level.png so that time progresses toward the right? That would, among other things, make it easier to compare to the other two graphs on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Past_sea_level.

Regards, humanengr Humanengr (talk) 15:01, 18 June 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Fenton Communications for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fenton Communications is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fenton Communications (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Clarityfiend (talk) 00:14, 20 September 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Abuse filter description

Template:Abuse filter description has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 22:30, 21 December 2023 (UTC)

Discussion on changes to this and a similar MediaWiki page

A discussion is ongoing at Wikipedia:Edit_filter_noticeboard#About_filter_247's_warning_and_disallow_messages for a matter concerning a MediaWiki page you have created and a similar MediaWiki page. EggRoll97 ^(talk) 23:56, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

Administrative permissions and inactivity reminder

This is a reminder that established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. You are receiving this annual reminder since you have averaged less than 50 edits per year over the last 5 years.

Inactive administrators are encouraged to reengage with the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to be engaged with the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 00:30, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

Pending suspension of administrative permissions due to insufficient activity

Established policy provides for the removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. Your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to the required activity level before the beginning of December 2024.

Inactive administrators are encouraged to engage with the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for re-engaging with the project are available at Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to re-engage with the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 00:27, 1 September 2024 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Module:DoNothing

Module:DoNothing has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 17:11, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

Invitation to participate in a research

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:21, 23 October 2024 (UTC)

Imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to insufficient activity

Established policy provides for the removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. Your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to the required activity level before the beginning of December 2024.

Inactive administrators are encouraged to engage with the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for re-engaging with the project are available at Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to re-engage with the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 00:21, 1 November 2024 (UTC)

Reminder to participate in Wikipedia research

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.

Take the survey here.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:17, 13 November 2024 (UTC)