User talk:Dwergenpaartje/Archive 4
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Dwergenpaartje. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 |
DYK for Paranomus abrotanifolius
On 8 February 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Paranomus abrotanifolius, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the seeds of the Bredasdorp sceptre are carried underground by ants? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Paranomus abrotanifolius. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Paranomus abrotanifolius), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Gatoclass (talk) 01:38, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 18
ResolvedAn automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gorteria diffusa, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Dehiscence and Clanwilliam (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:56, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
DYK for Oedera capensis
On 24 February 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Oedera capensis, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that what at first sight appears to be a single Oedera capensis flowerhead, is in fact typically a group of nine densely cropped heads? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Oedera capensis. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Oedera capensis), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 28
ResolvedAn automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- Leucospermum calligerum (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Stigma
- Leucospermum oleaefolium (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Petiole
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
Epithet corrections – a bit more
Hi, I noticed that you wrote that the ae forms were "archaic". I don't think this is quite the right word. Earlier botanists formed epithets by using the genitive of the name of a different plant + a noun for the part of the plant. Thus oleaefolium = "of-Olea leaf" = "leaf of Olea". The alternative was to join the two nouns by a "compounding letter", either -i- or -o-, thus oleifolium = "Olea-leaf". The botanical community decided to standardize on the latter, because (as far as I know) this was more classical, and in that sense more archaic. Peter coxhead (talk) 19:43, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
- @Peter coxhead: I understand what you are saying, and thanks for the further explanation. Changing the statement to make it correct and keeping it simple however is too difficult for me. Perhaps you can give it a go. Thanks, Dwergenpaartje (talk) 20:19, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
DYK for Romulea monadelpha
On 5 March 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Romulea monadelpha, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the flower of Romulea monadelpha is pollinated by a species of monkey beetle (both pictured)? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Romulea monadelpha. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Romulea monadelpha), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Alex Shih (talk) 00:01, 5 March 2018 (UTC)
Two for one...
For this DYK - Template:Did you know nominations/Leucospermum I added L. cordifolium as I have used its picture..(the good thing is it means we don't have to think of a clever hook for that one)...I'll get the other up soon too. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 10:39, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 17
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Leucospermum saxosum, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Transvaal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:43, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
DYK for Gorteria diffusa
On 27 March 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Gorteria diffusa, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that dark spots on the flowers of Gorteria diffusa (pictured) are thought to resemble bee flies to attract other bee flies? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Gorteria diffusa. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Gorteria diffusa), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Alex Shih (talk) 00:02, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
DYK for Romulea tortuosa
On 13 April 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Romulea tortuosa, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that some leaves of the South African plant Romulea tortuosa are shaped like corkscrews? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Romulea tortuosa. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Romulea tortuosa), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Ritchie333 (talk) 00:02, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Leucospermum
Hello! Your submission of Leucospermum at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 22:42, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
DYK for Leucospermum
On 27 April 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Leucospermum, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that plants of the genus Leucospermum (L. cordifolium pictured) are known as pincushions? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Leucospermum. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Leucospermum), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Gatoclass (talk) 12:02, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
DYK for Leucospermum cordifolium
On 27 April 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Leucospermum cordifolium, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that plants of the genus Leucospermum (L. cordifolium pictured) are known as pincushions? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Leucospermum cordifolium), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Gatoclass (talk) 12:02, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 3
ResolvedAn automated process has detected that when you recently edited Leucospermum erubescens, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stigma (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
Leucospermum truncatulum
Hello, and thank you for lending your time to help improve Wikipedia! If you are interested in editing more often, I suggest you create an account to gain additional privileges. Happy editing! KnowledgeChuck (talk) 16:32, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
A page you started (Leucospermum truncatulum) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Leucospermum truncatulum, Dwergenpaartje!
Wikipedia editor SamHolt6 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Easily passes review. Well sourced, in-depth, categories already in place, images formatted correctly. Thanks for creating!
To reply, leave a comment on SamHolt6's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
SamHolt6 (talk) 16:33, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
Dwergenpaartje, we really need to hear from you on this nomination if it is to proceed. Please respond there as soon as possible. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 04:12, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
DYK for Leucospermum cuneiforme
On 8 May 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Leucospermum cuneiforme, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Leucospermum cuneiforme is known as luisiesbos ("lice bush") in Afrikaans as its seed pods resemble lice? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Leucospermum cuneiforme. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Leucospermum cuneiforme), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Gatoclass (talk) 12:02, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 16
ResolvedAn automated process has detected that when you recently edited Leucospermum tomentosum, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bark (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:11, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
A page you started (Leucospermum wittebergense) has been reviewed!
ResolvedThanks for creating Leucospermum wittebergense, Dwergenpaartje!
Wikipedia editor Nick Moyes just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Nice article, but the lede is far too detailed. Please just summarise basic facts, especially making clear which country/s it is distributed in. The names you've used don't help readers unfamiliar with local/regional names. Thanks.
To reply, leave a comment on Nick Moyes's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Nick Moyes (talk) 10:37, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
Two things.....
I did 2 dyk noms at Template:Did you know nominations/Leucospermum arenarium - can you add the source that sources the rodent pollinators best? 
Done - also Template:Did you know nominations/Leucospermum praemorsum
Also - I updated your user rights so you can move pages and your pages are automatically reviewed and a couple of other things Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 09:57, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
DYK for Leucospermum arenarium
On 12 August 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Leucospermum arenarium, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the flowers of the Redelinghuys pincushion are pollinated by rodents? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Leucospermum arenarium. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Leucospermum arenarium), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
DYK for Leucadendron salignum
On 18 August 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Leucadendron salignum, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the flowers of the common sunshine conebush are pollinated by beetles? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Leucadendron salignum. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Leucadendron salignum), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Alex Shih (talk) 00:02, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
DYK for Leucospermum praemorsum
On 23 August 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Leucospermum praemorsum, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the seeds of the Nardouw fountain pincushion are carried underground by ants? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Leucospermum praemorsum. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Leucospermum praemorsum), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Alex Shih (talk) 00:02, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 30
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mimetes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Elim (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Serruria elongata
Hello! Your submission of Serruria elongata at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 23:30, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 6
ResolvedAn automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- Mimetes (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- Pelargonium peltatum (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Petiole
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:49, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
DYK for Serruria elongata
On 21 September 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Serruria elongata, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that flowers of the long-stalk spiderhead (pictured) produce a sweet smell late in the afternoon? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Serruria elongata. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Serruria elongata), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Vanamonde (talk) 00:01, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
DYK for Pelargonium peltatum
On 7 October 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Pelargonium peltatum, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Willem Adriaan van der Stel introduced the ivy-leaved pelargonium to the Netherlands from South Africa in 1700? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Pelargonium peltatum. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Pelargonium peltatum), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Alex Shih (talk) 00:03, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
Precious
extinct mollusks and flowering shrubs
Thank you for quality articles about natural subjects from Musculus somaliensis (2011) via Pelargonium peltatum to Mimetes chrysanthus, also expanding the related genus articles,revising and adding categories, for a silent focus on content, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:21, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
- Thank you so much! Dwergenpaartje (talk) 11:38, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 3
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Vexatorella latebrosa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kamiesberg (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:35, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Dwergenpaartje. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Dwergenpaartje. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
DYK for Mimetes stokoei
On 17 December 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Mimetes stokoei, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the mace pagoda (pictured) was twice presumed extinct, but in each case reappeared in its natural habitat from seed after a wildfire? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Mimetes stokoei. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Mimetes stokoei), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Vanamonde (talk) 12:01, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
Austral season's greetings
|
Austral season's greetings |
| Tuck into this! We've made about three of these in the last few days for various festivities. Supermarkets are stuffed with cheap berries. Season's greetings! Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 22:05, 24 December 2018 (UTC) |
Looks delicious, have a great time too! Dwergenpaartje (talk) 22:08, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
Fractions, units
Hello! Thanks for creating Felicia fruticosa. I wanted to point you to these edits I made to it, as well as Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers § Fractions and Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers § Unit conversions. It's generally against Wikipedia style guidelines to display fractions using special characters such as ½. If a number needs to be displayed as a fraction, the notation {{frac|numerator|denominator}} is preferred—so {{frac|1|2}} to produce 1⁄2. This makes Wikipedia more accessible for users using screen readers, as well as those with certain sight disabilities. Additionally, rather than manually converting units, the use of {{convert}} is generally preferred, as it is a more versatile template, and will keep units at the same level of precision. The documentation over at {{convert}} showcases the many uses for the template. Let me know if you have any questions! cymru.lass (talk • contribs) 17:53, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
- Ah, yes. Thank you for teaching me new technicalities on fractions. I am using fractions on purpose though. This has to do with the fact that often a digit suggest too much precision, you know, 6.5 actually means anything between 6.45 and 6.55 while 6½ means anything between 6.25 and 6.75. Also, in the automated conversions, additional digits are created, suggesting false precision and that is the reason why I prefer manual conversions. Dwergenpaartje (talk) 20:54, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
- Try {{cvt|17|cm|in|frac=2}}, which produces 17 cm (6+1⁄2 in) —Hyperik ⌜talk⌟ 21:24, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
- Good one, I'll be using that. Thanks! Dwergenpaartje (talk) 21:43, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
- Try {{cvt|17|cm|in|frac=2}}, which produces 17 cm (6+1⁄2 in) —Hyperik ⌜talk⌟ 21:24, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
Κέφαλος
Beste Dwergenpaartje, you have added the following etymological information to Cephalopyge trematoides: "(Greek: Κέφαλος Kephalos, "head")". But Κέφαλος is actual the name of a Greek mythological figure, whereas written with a lower-case kappa, it is the name of a species of mullet. In ancient Greek κεφαλή is actually the word for head. Is your source mistaken or did you misinterpreted the source? With kind regards, Wimpus (talk) 11:52, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
- @Wimpus: Thanks, Dwergenpaartje (talk) 15:49, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
- Beste Dwergenpaartje, please take a look at this, where you state, without providing a source, that cephalon would the Latin word for head. Could you correct this by providing a reliable source. Wimpus (talk) 20:20, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
- @Wimpus: Thanks, I have deleted the statement. If you come across any previous mistakes please correct or delete these yourselves. You can't expect me to correct articles I created more than five years ago. Dwergenpaartje (talk) 21:11, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
- Oké, dank. Wimpus (talk) 21:13, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
- @Wimpus: Thanks, I have deleted the statement. If you come across any previous mistakes please correct or delete these yourselves. You can't expect me to correct articles I created more than five years ago. Dwergenpaartje (talk) 21:11, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
- Beste Dwergenpaartje, please take a look at this, where you state, without providing a source, that cephalon would the Latin word for head. Could you correct this by providing a reliable source. Wimpus (talk) 20:20, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 20
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
- Felicia aethiopica (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Bark Resolved
- added a link pointing to Bark
- Mairia coriacea (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Bolus Resolved
- added a link pointing to Bolus
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
plants
what cas has done is for plants - if they are found in south africa - please also add that as well - thanks JarrahTree 09:52, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
- @JarrahTree: I always try to do that, but do not think it is appropriate to grade the result of my own editing. So I wait for a grade and copy that to the SAf template. Cheers! Dwergenpaartje (talk) 10:20, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
September 2019: Leucospermum hypophyllocarpodendron
I am having difficulty understanding a term introduced by you to the above article in March of 2018 in this edit. The term, with which I am unfamiliar, is "cringy", which appears several times in the article to describe fine hairs appearing on the new leaves. It apparently is an adjective. Would you be able to clarify for me and other readers what the meaning of that term, as you have used it in the article, might be? Thank you.--Quisqualis (talk) 03:35, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
- @Quisqualis: Thank you for pointing out this is an odd word. "Cringing" is basically synonymous with "recoiling", but cringy is usually applied to an unconfortable feeling. I think I overreached in trying to avoid close paraphrasing. I have replaced the word with "crisped". I hope that clarifies it. Dwergenpaartje (talk) 09:13, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
Precious anniversary
| |
| extinct mollusks and flowering shrubs | |
|---|---|
| ... you were recipient no. 2039 of Precious, a prize of QAI! |
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:43, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
| Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Disambiguation link notification for January 23
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pelargonium cucullatum, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Paul Hermann (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:24, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 22
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Didelta, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pappus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:49, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
- excellent little article, thanks. Very small note that per WP:FRMOS we show the accent É on French names, as also quality English books https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=FQRHAAAAQBAJ&pg=PA180 Many thanks and happy editing. In ictu oculi (talk) 12:47, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
Precious anniversary
| |
| Two years! |
|---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:33, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
| Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Disambiguation link notification for March 18
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Otholobium accrescens, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Auricle.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 18
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- Otholobium
- added links pointing to Petiole, Calyx, James Grimes, Cullen, Daniel Oliver and Leaflet
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 25
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- Cape dune mole-rat
- added links pointing to Andrew Smith and Austin Roberts
- Common mole-rat
- added links pointing to Andrew Smith and Austin Roberts
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Precious anniversary
| |
| Three years! |
|---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:49, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
| Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Disambiguation link notification for January 6
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Wachendorfia thyrsiflora, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Clanwilliam.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 25
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John Bellenden Ker Gawler, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Sims.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
Precious anniversary
| |
| Four years! |
|---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:46, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:07, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
"Black Table" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect Black Table has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 July 4 § Black Table until a consensus is reached. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:10, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Ortholobium
The position of Otholobium at present seems to be a mess. I see that you created most of the article. It appears to be agreed by sources such as Plants of the World Online that the African species of Otholobium are synonymous with Psoralea (which is the older name), so they are treated in that genus. Thus Otholobium accrescens is a synonym of Psoralea accrescens. The problem with the South American species is that they cannot be left in Otholobium, because the type species of that genus was the South African Psoralea caffra, so when the genera are combined, Otholobium becomes a synonym of Psoralea. As of now, South American species like Otholobium glandulosum are treated as "unplaced" by PoWO. I do think that we have to be clear that the South African species are now placed in Psoralea – note for example that Psoralea accrescens is listed in the Psoralea article. There's a real danger of articles being created for some species in both Psoralea and Otholobium. Peter coxhead (talk) 18:32, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, you are right. South-American Otholobium is not particularly closely related to South-African. The author of Otholobium, Charles Stirton, himself only put South-African species in his own genus. Merging South-African Otholobium with Psoralea is straight forward, but Stirton himself identified characters distinguishing the two. Following the phylogeny portrayed in the wiki-article, the consequence of lumping both South-African and South American Otholobium with Psoralea implies that all other genera in the entire Psoraleeae are reduced to Psoralea (i.e. Cullen, Bituminaria, Hoita, Orbexilum, Ladeania, Psoralidium, Rupertia and Pediomelum). I am not aware of a new study conflicting with the one cited there. Stirton seems to have changed his opinion from splitting to lumping, but I do not know exactly why. I note however that the South African National Biodiversity Institute (SANBI) still sticks to Otholobium, e.g. Otholobium bracteolatum. As long as a revision has not been published, stability in the nomenclature of the Psoraleeae is not guaranteed. I think redirects from Psoralea species to the respective names in Otholobium would be clear enough and avoids changes that may have to be reverted in coming years. Do you want me to consult Stirton or one of his younger colleagues, so you can make an informed decision? I am all in your hands. Dwergenpaartje (talk) 10:48, 21 April 2024 (UTC)