User talk:GijsvdL

Hello GijsvdL! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already loving Wikipedia you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! Just H^{editor review} 00:30, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Fair use • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Edit warring over attribution

Please cease edit warring over the required attribution at Melody Thomas Scott. The link Mike Halterman is adding is not spam; it's the proper method of attribution as verified by the Foundation. Further reverting will be considered disruption and will be dealt with appropriately. krimpet ✽ 19:03, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You could at least have prevented a revert at Commons by proper use of the edit summary. GijsvdL (talk) 21:49, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And you could stop sniping at people and making people lose patience with you on both en and nl. Just stop it. Mike H. Fierce! 23:28, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Melody Amber

Please cease edit warring over the references at Melody Amber. The links that were reinserted by Jisis are not self-promotion; it's the proper method of providing sources to the article. Further reverting will be considered disruption and will be dealt with accordingly. Guido den Broeder (talk) 15:24, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You are the vandal in this case. NL.wiki arbcom has taken severe measures against you, just because your shameless self promotion. GijsvdL (talk) 21:58, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Suit yourself, keep lying. Guido den Broeder (talk) 22:10, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Melody Amber chess tournament

I've decided to try something different today: I won't block you if both of you (User:Guido den Broeder) just stop editing chess articles and use discussion to work out your disagreements. Both of you are not allowed to edit a chess article (Except to remove blatantly obvious vandalism/libel) until some progress is made between you. If you wish, I can help mediate the discussion. Scarian ^{Call me Pat!} 09:21, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

(Copied and pasted from my talk page) Nej, Guido and Gijsvdl, it's your own choice on whether you edit chess articles or not but please be aware that both of your separate contributions will come under scrutiny. I have offered to mediate to prevent future blockings. If you show willingness to co-operate together and to accept peace and harmony into your lives on Wikipedia then that is very positive. By immediately dismissing my offer, Gijsvdl, you've shown that you don't want to work together. I recommend that the disputed content in question be analysed to remove any WP:POV, et al. Do you wish to do this or not? If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me. Scarian ^{Call me Pat!} 15:42, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User:Scarian/Med1 - Started here. Scarian ^{Call me Pat!} 16:08, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Let me be more clear: I see Guido den Broeder not as a collegue, with which I've a 'dispute'. I see him as an uneducadable vandal, with which we have problems at NL.wiki for years now. NL.wiki arbcom took severe measures against Guido. I'm not in a dispute, I'm just fighting against a vandal. This is not stuff for mediation, the question is if you like to help the vandal or not. GijsvdL (talk) 21:51, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above information is false. Please check with nl:Arbcom. Guido den Broeder (talk) 21:56, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please proof that I'm not seeing you as an uneducadable vandal? GijsvdL (talk) 21:59, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Guido den Broeder

Since you are involved in a dispute with Guido den Broeder (talk · contribs) over WP:COI and mediation appears to have failed, I have raised this issue on the conflict of interest noticeboard. I would like to ask you to join the discussion, at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard#Guido den Broeder vs. others. A ecis^Brievenbus 22:32, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As you can read above, I'm not in a dispute with Guido den Broeder. GijsvdL (talk) 22:56, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

How do you feel about the article Vereniging Basisinkomen? Migdejong (talk) 10:46, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

2008 Formula One season

Wat speel jij een vieze spelletjes om je gelijk te halen, zeg. Bah. - Erik Baas (talk) 16:03, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ik begrijp hier werkelijk niets van. Jij doet zo je best om een prachtig bruikbaar bestand te maken. Waarom wil je dan niet dat andere taalversies daar ook profijt van hebben? GijsvdL (talk) 16:06, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kom nou toch, het staat er toch bij ? Het is experimenteel, niet klaar, ik ben er niet trots op, onzeker over vorm en inhoud, en er loopt nog overleg over. Oftewel: ik wil niet afgaan voor de hele wereld, eerst maar eens afwchten hoe het op nl: valt. Hoe vaak moet ik dat nog uitleggen ? - Erik Baas (talk) 16:49, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Maakt ook niet uit: {nietverplaatsen} betekent NIET VERPLAATSEN. Punt. - Erik Baas (talk) 16:49, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:38, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]