User talk:GyoergyGajdos
Please refrain from engaging in disruptive editing on the article Feynman sprinkler. When it's clear that your edit is contentious and reasonable arguments are put forth for why, it needs to be established via talk page consensus. We're both here to improve the encyclopedia, but an edit war is completely unproductive. TheTechnician27 (Talk page) 11:01, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Your adjectives are not objective truth. I am a degree physicist and I know what criteria are needed. It is a transparent, repeatable experiment ,with the GIF having an educational/inspirational value. 185.237.102.121 (talk) 11:13, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Such an experiment can be repeated by a science teacher and by pupils themselves. This is why there is a youtube video referenced to it (for detailed explanation). There are countless articles on quora with a GIF or video demonstration of a phenomena 185.237.102.121 (talk) 11:41, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- The YouTube video is your YouTube video. It's literally your channel, and it does not give a detailed explanation. For an actual detailed explanation, see the University of Maryland. I have a degree too; that doesn't mean that I can just create whatever I want and expect to insert it into Wikipedia. Wikipedia operates on verifiability, and there are more glaring issues than that with the GIF. I would revert your edit again except for the three-revert rule, but you're being completely disruptive and failing to understand basic Wikipedia guidelines for consensus-building, and I am taking this to ANI (I'll post a formal notice below). TheTechnician27 (Talk page) 12:05, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- A university experiment and explanation is not adequate for lower grade educational purposes. This is the value of such and similar experiments and they are widely posted. 185.237.102.121 (talk) 12:08, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- The YouTube video is your YouTube video. It's literally your channel, and it does not give a detailed explanation. For an actual detailed explanation, see the University of Maryland. I have a degree too; that doesn't mean that I can just create whatever I want and expect to insert it into Wikipedia. Wikipedia operates on verifiability, and there are more glaring issues than that with the GIF. I would revert your edit again except for the three-revert rule, but you're being completely disruptive and failing to understand basic Wikipedia guidelines for consensus-building, and I am taking this to ANI (I'll post a formal notice below). TheTechnician27 (Talk page) 12:05, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Such an experiment can be repeated by a science teacher and by pupils themselves. This is why there is a youtube video referenced to it (for detailed explanation). There are countless articles on quora with a GIF or video demonstration of a phenomena 185.237.102.121 (talk) 11:41, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
ANI notice
[edit]
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. TheTechnician27 (Talk page) 12:32, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
November 2024
[edit]
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Feynman sprinkler. Bbb23 (talk) 13:31, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 14:00, 22 November 2024 (UTC)