This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
This is just a friendly reminder that Wikipedia Weekly has been released with a new episode!
This is a special episode we recored specifically dealing w/ the whole Essjay/Ryan Jordan situation. We recorded this before Jimbo's second comment, so it might be a little dated but still a good listen.
Please spread the word about Wikipedia Weekly, we're trying to spread the word so that people know about the project, we've got some cool guests lined up and it makes it much more fun if people tune in!
You are recieving this message because you are listed on Wikipedia:WikiProject WikipediaWeekly/delivery - if you do not wish to recieve such notifications please remove yourself from the list.
Status switcher
Hi, I have been around Wikipedia for a while but not a expert on scripts. I attemped to follow this one and I could not understand it, I edited some of the pages as it said but does not seem to work. Do you know where I went wrong? - Mike Beckham09:17, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I noticed that too. I got caught by a tricky regex trap, but it should be fixed now. However, it will be more tricky to clean up the mess it did with that thread... Миша1321:22, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
User page prod
I believe the policy has changed. (Quote Proposed deletion is a process for deleting articles (and, under certain circumstances, user pages)). Agathoclea22:56, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
EssjayBot III
Hey mate. I believe you wrote the code for Essjay's archiving bots (I could be wrong). If so, any chance you maybe resurrecting something similar as a MiszaBot? That bot was so so handy! :) Glen10:38, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Gah, I've been observing the Essjay drama for a while and only just noticed that he (and his bots) quit. :'(
I've already started rewriting the code (since it's so messy) to a newer version, but gave it up due to real-life burden a while ago. But since there'll be a need for it, I'll try to find some time to dig it up and set up under MiszaBot. Миша1310:46, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Okay folks, it's set up. Now I just have to figure out the bot's other "clients", preferably without going through EB3's contribs or asking everyone... Миша1323:19, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I notice you have a conveniently banner ad sized bit of userpage that you don't know what to do with :) Is it really for rent? If so, is it OK if I advertise stuff like maintenance collaborations and guidelines there? Thanks for your time – Qxz19:01, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Well, yes it is. I used to have the motto there, but got disappointed. Then there was {{Special:Recentchanges/1}} trancluded for a while, but I got bored. Gurch promised to put something there, but left. So, I'm stuck with this piece of space and no ideas. Go ahead and edit User:Misza13/Global Header with regard to that space. If it's something interesting and I like it, I'll just adding something like "Ad by Qxz" and let it be. ;-) Миша1319:13, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I've constructed a template in my userspace which randomly displays one of six banner-ad-shaped images that I've uploaded, some of which are animated. This template is already in use on my talk page and others; I'll add that to the header. I'm planning to add more over time – feedback on the ads themselves and suggestions for new ones would be most welcome. Thanks again – Qxz00:56, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hey there, Misza13, I saw in an above thread that you were looking for EssjaybotIII's former "clients". Well, I'm one of them. :-) I don't know what you need me to do to get back to the archiving business, but anyway, here's one user you don't have to hunt down. Talk to you soon! Heimstern Läufer23:36, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hmm, I just noticed this. Can it do archives by number of headings in each, rather than size? At the moment I start a new archive when the current one has 50 sections in it, it'd be nice if a bot could do that. Thanks – Qxz03:16, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This is just a friendly reminder that Wikipedia Weekly has been released with a new episode..... 13!
We've decided to avoid the direct link to the audio file in an attempt to prevent any sort of audio format war. You can download whichever version you want (we have OGG, MP3 and AAC on the site.
Please spread the word about Wikipedia Weekly, we're trying to spread the word so that people know about the project, we've got some cool guests lined up and it makes it much more fun if people tune in!
You are recieving this message because you are listed on Wikipedia:WikiProject WikipediaWeekly/delivery - if you do not wish to recieve such notifications please remove yourself from the list.
Bot request
Thanks for stepping in to replace Essjay's Bots. There were two pages that his Bots used to archive at my request:
Hi there! Could you find it in your heart to bot archive my talk pages, too? I was using Werdnabot, but it has been (temporarily?) decommissioned for reasons I have not been able to determine.
In any case, I understand your good intentions. I had some useful links there however, any chance I could get them back or is the page lost for good? 2help07:13, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It's not that simple. You have the template {{test5i}} transcluded on your page. It adds your page to the Category:Temporary Wikipedian userpages, which gets cleaned up periodically. But that assumes that the template was put on pages of users that were indefinitely blocked, which is not the case here. Since it is only me, who does the cleanup recently, before the next run I'll think of something so that it doesn't get deleted again. Sorry for any inconvenience caused. Happy editing, Миша1308:10, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
OK, that makes sense. Thanks for reposting the page. Let me know if there is anything I can do make your cleanup process easier. 2help00:20, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I saw this discussion while here on Bot business. I've removed the Category: Temporary Wikipedian userpages from 2help's userpage. Given that he must use the shortcuts on the left and not copy and paste from the right, it doesn't seem to affect his use of warnings whether the cat is there or not (he just wants to see what they look like)... WjBscribe15:30, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Heh, I should've checked the page's contents myself. Then I'd probably notice that a bot has substituted them already 3 months ago. Anyway, that means they're probably severely out of date now (with the help of the WP:UW project). Oh well... Миша1315:35, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Your bot has successfully archived my talk pages, for which I thank you. A wikifriend of mine asked me to set up Werdnabot on his talk page (this before we knew Werdna died). I set up archives for him, and am now making the bot request on his behalf. You can see his request to me here.
Ready. I've actually set it to /Archive$Y-A in the special "dated" mode, which means it should switch by itself next year. It'll however have a hard time with big, year-old archives... :/ Миша1315:57, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Well, right now it only supports variables for the year and month of thread. For an example, see how my archives are organised. I don't think I'll be adding this particular feature (-A and -B), unless I implement some sort of formula parsing, so just bug me in summer whenever it's time to turn the counter. Миша1318:57, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
No, there is no feature list at the moment, because I expect it to evolve rapidly soon. So far it can put threads into archives and move on to next when they reach a certain size (in kilobytes). It lacks the automatic updating of an archive box yet, and that's gonna be one difficult feature to add. Миша1314:06, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
OK, just checking. Apparently, I'm not the only one with the problem that I had EssjayBot doing it, so then went to Werdnabot which never even ran on mine. Anyway, what language is it in? I may be able to contribute a little. — RevRagnarokTalkContrib14:18, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The OGG version is here
The MP3 version (non free file format but it works on an iPod) is here
In this edition
We wrap up the Essjay affair, as the famous Wikipedian cuts ties to the online encyclopedia.
A look at the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year Competition, which finished earlier this week. In addition, all the Featured Pictures of 2006 are available as a bittorrent download.
The new “Username Usurpation” feature at the English Wikipedia.
Jimmy Wales travels to India for the recent Indian WikiCamp, and narrowly survives an attack of ninja monkeys.
One thousand Featured Articles at the German Wikipedia.
Please spread the word about Wikipedia Weekly, we're trying to spread the word so that people know about the project, we've got some cool guests lined up and it makes it much more fun if people tune in!
You are recieving this message because you are listed on Wikipedia:WikiProject WikipediaWeekly/delivery - if you do not wish to recieve such notifications please remove yourself from the list.
I have blocked the bot for 24 hours, so it does not do it again on it's next run(I assume it runs at automatic intervals). Once you know what has gone wrong I will gladly unblock. Sorry about that, thank you for filling in with this much needed service. HighInBC(Need help? Ask me)02:46, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oops indeed. I have rewritten the variable handling yesterday, uploaded the new code to toolserv, uploaded updated config for I and II, but forgot about III. :-P Anyway, since it's fixed and mess cleaned up, I'll unblock it myself, if you don't mind. And thanks for keeping an eye on it - it's still in rapid development stage and while I test it before running, errors such as this may still happen. Миша1310:05, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Essjay
Could you tell me where you think the sourcing of the Essjay article is lacking? I'm truly keen on knowing what you think :) Gwen Gale12:49, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not suggesting any lackings. My sarcasm was rather refering to the fact that any articles on controversial, even-if-marginally-notable-outside-Wikipedia topics tend to have their references section blown out of proportion compared to the size of article, with nearly every sentence referenced. This of course is required so that noone can find a proper stick to kill the article with. And by the way, I really and without sarcasm would like people to concentrate on the 1,6M+ other articles we have, most of which are crap beyond imagination with regard to refernces. Миша1313:00, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Misza13, thank you so much for taking my order. There seems to be a proble, though. The bot is archiving my messages to Archive03, not Archive3 as I'd requested. Is that how it work? Thanks a lot. Xiner (talk, email) 14:49, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
No, it's an error on my side. I must've just made an error when copy-pasting the configuration. Should be fixed now. Миша1314:55, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This fair use image became orphaned due to vandalism that was not correctly reverted. Do you feel that its fair-use rationale still applies to the article (Pop-up Video)? –Unint19:37, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I would say yes, but don't quote me on this (I'm not an expert). Since it was deleted by mistake, I have restored it. Миша1320:50, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Yes - it makes decisions basedon oldest timestamp in a thread. Sections without timestamps are ignored (will add an option to archive these in future). Миша1300:02, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Did I say "oldest"? Please discard my incoherent babbling - it's 1AM here... Of course it looks on the newest timestamp. Миша1300:20, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
How about MiszaBot II? It would be nice on places like Wikipedia:Drawing board to leave requests that haven't gotten replies yet alone when archiving. The idea being that once the clutter of replied to requests are archived, the unreplied requests will stand out better, not to mention that these users deserve a reply even if there's a backlog. Thanks! —Elipongo (Talk|contribs) 07:00, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
User talk:Jimbo Wales is currently archiving threads older than 2 days. It was originally 7 days, but I lowered it due to the high traffic it had been receiving due to the Essjay incident. Now that the high traffic has subsided, it might be a good idea to return to the old behaviour. --cesarb07:33, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I have disabled it per your request, although I don't understand what's wrong with it. Please make up your mind - I didn't come to set up the archiving on my own, but was asked by someone else (User:Fbv65edel). Миша1319:21, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Misza, I know Essjay used to insist on seeing a concensus on an article's talkpage before he was willing to archive it. If this sort of thing continues, you might want to introduce a similar requirement for MiszaBot. WjBscribe19:24, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
People put comments on talk pages and might like to read the answers they get before the whole lot gets deleted. 5 days delay is crazy. Aside from that, 5 months is crazy if a point is important and still relevant to the contents of the page. You can't just archive away things useful to editors. I have made up my mind, and on this point I havn't changed it. I don't recall anyone asking. FBV did ask about himself archiving some stuff on that page, but in that case he also went ahead and did it before I even noticed he was considering it, which rather illustrated my first point. Sandpiper00:58, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, the user right after Martin was renamed and the bot freaked out on a page redirect. Such problems will be entirely fixed once I implement a Werdnabot-style template-based config. Миша1320:34, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
One was the scheduled and the other manual. I was tweaking TeckWiz's page settings and the other thread just happened to jump on the second round. :) Scheduled runs start on HH:35 (every 6 hours). Миша1321:01, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This is just a friendly reminder that Wikipedia Weekly has been released with a new episode..... 15!
The link to all versions of Wikipedia Weekly 14 is at [2]
The OGG version is here
The MP3 version (non free file format but it works on an iPod) is here
In this edition
This episode sees Liam, more commonly known as Witty Lama, catching up with Rama’s Arrow and Ragib to talk about contributing to Wikipedia from and Indian and Bangladeshi perspective. Topics include their growing collection of Featured Articles, the success of the Indian WikiProject, and the problem of Internet access on the Subcontinent.
Please spread the word about Wikipedia Weekly, we're trying to spread the word so that people know about the project, we've got some cool guests lined up and it makes it much more fun if people tune in!
You are receiving this message because you are listed on Wikipedia:WikiProject WikipediaWeekly/delivery - if you do not wish to receive such notifications please remove yourself from the list.
Hi, it seems that one user Shadow1 is using the defunct Werdnabot for archiving. Could you please contact him for using MiszaBot III. Cheers! zero»01:24, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I see you've been blocking a bunch of disruptive usernames ("x is y's IP" and the like). Way to catch those guys! Could I suggest, however, that you enable autoblock, to prevent them from creating more ridiculous usernames? I think it's pretty clear that they aren't going to be constructive contributors. Natalie03:54, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I usually avoid setting autoblocks, because they are discouraged due to collateral damage (the vandal may be using a shared IP, and they usually are) and WP:AGF. Only in severe cases (long series of abusive names) I tick the box. There's however one username vandal that just returns after the autoblock expires and also hops IPs. Regards, Миша1308:25, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Archiver
Hello! I currently have your bot archiving my talk page, but I've found that the archive page is just too long. Is it possible for you to change it so that the archive is switched after 125KB instead 250KB? Thanks! --Cremepuff222 (talk, review me!) 01:23, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Misza, I have a suggestion for archiving the noticeboards. There could be two settings for thread age to trigger archiving. If the thread is either "resolved" (using {{resolved}}), or "closed", then the thread can be archived earlier, and in addition, threads that are idling because people haven't paid attention to some request will stay unarchived longer. —Quarl(talk) 2007-03-16 07:34Z
Nice suggestions, but you should keep implementational issues in mind too. While the detection of {{resolved}} is a simple idea and should be ready soon, but I don't quite understand how do you propose to detect the "closed" state of a thread. Also, how do you discern threads that noone has paid attention too from those that are resolved & closed already, but perhaps not tagged properly? Миша1307:47, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Good point, well, it'll be another incentive to mark threads as {resolved} :) —Quarl(talk) 2007-03-16 10:12Z
I added 'class="discussion-archived"' to the div in Template:discussion top, so it should be easy to detect it now. —Quarl(talk) 2007-03-17 05:39Z
Werdnabot
Given that this Bot is unavailable for now- and at worse case scenario may have become ownerless, I think its important to draw people's attention to this and suggest your bot as an alternative. Otherwise Wikipedia may drown in its own talk (and boy do we all like to talk!). I was thinking of a post at WP:AN and on the Village Pump (I don't see any so far). Just wanted to check with you first as to whether you minded the possibly large inflow of requests you might get... WjBscribe14:40, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I think I could quite easily process even 10s of requests as long as they follow instructions. Worse thing will be with cleaning up the talk pages from old code (if I'm not mistaken, WB used to maintain and update archive indexes - a feature MiszaBot doesn't have yet). Миша1314:45, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, it did that if the "archivelist=" parameter was included, but it looks like most users of the template did not included it. So either people didn't want it, or didn't realise it could do that. Either way the function shouldn't be missed too much....
If you're happy with the extra requests I'll post a couple of notes about Werdnabot and suggest your Bot as an alternative. Thanks, WjBscribe14:50, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Does your bot archive user talk pages as well? I looked on the bots page but it said it only does noticeboards. However your talk page seems to indicate otherwise. If so, could I get your bot to archive my user talk page at User talk:Swatjester? Thanks!⇒SWATJesterOn Belay!19:58, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, Misza, do you run your bot on foreign wikipedias as well? At Swedish Wikipedia we would like to have our Village Pump archived on a regular basis. Is this something you can do? //Knuckles15:48, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hi! The user status is a great idea! But I just can't get it to work. I followed the instructions and the only thing that I changed was "Example's Status" to "Greeves' Status" on the template. If you could have a look at it, I have all the same page names that you chose. The strange thing is that I see the in/out/busy when I preview my monobook yet when I save, it doesn't stay. Thanks in advance! Greeves(talk • contribs)00:32, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Quite understandable. On preview, the JS is force-loaded, but making it persistent requires clearing the browser's cache. You can read more about it on WP:CACHE. Cheers, Миша1318:10, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Strange, since the counter in the config explicitly states "22" now - maybe just a one-time glitch - I'll see if it repeats itself. Миша1317:50, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hi,
Sorry for the blatant spam, but you have yourself down as active at WikiProject user warnings WP:UW. There is a discussion on going here that might be of interest to you about the future of this project. There are two strawpolls on the talk pages and the second one is about the future of the WP:UW project. Now we have the end in sight we are looking at wrapping up the project and merging it with Template messages/User talk namespace WP:UTM and creating a one stop shop for all userspace template issue. As you are or have been active on this project we feel you may have some input on this issue, and would like you to visit the discussion and give any thoughts you may have on the matter. Cheers Khukri10:06, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, after MiszaBot's last edit, the archive had only 117K. Then you dumped some stuff manually and overloaded it to its current state. By how the bot works, it will now drop one more thread there and then detect that it's full (it assumes it's the only archiver) and move on to #3. As of thread age, can you point me to a diff where it archived a thread "younger" than 3 days? Cheers, Миша1321:30, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hey, your bots didn't edit today. (I had to archive my talk page myself! :o) Are they dead, or just sleeping? Sorry for being impatient :) – Qxz21:42, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
For one thing, I have lowered the edit rate to one run daily. For the other, seems that toolserv had a downtime while the run was scheduled (2:35) for today. Миша1321:46, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Recently, MiszaBot III ran three times in a 24 hour period on a user talk page:
20:36, 18 March 2007 MiszaBot III (Talk | contribs) m (Archiving 1 thread(s) older than 3d to User talk:Qxz/Archive 5.)
08:36, 18 March 2007 MiszaBot III (Talk | contribs) m (Archiving 2 thread(s) older than 3d to User talk:Qxz/Archive 4, User talk:Qxz/Archive 5.)
02:36, 18 March 2007 MiszaBot III (Talk | contribs) m (Archiving 2 thread(s) older than 3d to User talk:Qxz/Archive 4.)
It would be more convenient for me if the bot only ran once in a 24-hour period on a given talk page.
(This is because when I am monitoring a talk page, I like to select an entire range of revisions and just see the differences between the first and last revisions. Each time an archive bot runs, it inserts a large revision that is irrelevant to me.)
I see elsewhere on your talkpage that MiszaBot III has missed a few cycles. I'm sorry if my suggestion is causing troubles. Please feel free to undo. --Kevinkor204:08, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
MiszaBot III
Hi, MiszaBot III hasn't archived my talkpage since March 19, although there are now a number of threads older than 7 days on it. Is there a problem? I'd be grateful if you could find a sec to look into it. WjBscribe02:45, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
There is a small harmless bug here[3] where it says it is archiving 3 threads, but it is really archiving 4 threads. I think it is because on of those threads has no replies. Just thought I would point it out, thanks for taking over the archiving work. HighInBC(Need help? Ask me)03:05, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Difficult to tell from the look of the diff and I don't have detailed execution logs either. My best guess would be that (for some reason) the bot didn't recognize one of the thread headers and treated it as a part of the previous one's content. Миша1307:51, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
In cases when a user/IP abuses the {{unblock}} template or repetitively vandalises their talk page while blocked (and that was the apparent case here), their talk page may be protected from editing until the block expires. Миша1320:43, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Then in that case could you add {{schoolip|Liberty Public Schools}}. (The only (possible) DNS I know of for this IP address is liberty.k12.mo.us which doesn't match up with 204.185.75.130) Spixels21:17, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Misza! Is there a way that your bot can move all messages from that month to that archive no matter what (currently, if you use month archives, and someone leaves a message on the 27, and you have your bot set to archive after its 7 days old, it will archive to the next month, since it will be a new month in 7 days). Thanks! --TeckWizParlateContribs@13:46, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
No it won't. Each thread's time is equal to the last timestamp in that thread. So, if someone posts on 27th of March and you reply on 28th then it will be archived somewhere in April, but will land in the March archive (because the thread's timestamp is from March). Миша1313:57, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hmmm, does this mean everyone's going to have to have a template on their talk page for MiszaBot to work? And you didn't select me! :( – Qxz17:27, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, it means that. And sorry for not choosing you - I just needed a small sample - will run a batch conversion of all current users later on. Миша1317:30, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, finally a good point. Obviously that's a screw up on my part. In the new system, the maxage parameter is ignored (as it is superceded by algo) - I forgot to scrap it when upgrading the system. I'll set up a hack in the code so that it gets removed on the next run. Миша1322:44, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Template
You're probably getting tired of me (seeing as this is the third time I've posted a message on this page), but does the template allow users to change MiszaBot's archiving settings? --Cremepuff222 (talk, review me!) 23:21, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
(before edit conflict) I'm actually tired of keeping up with the new requests and maintaining the current configuration (it breaks more often than you might think). Thus, the answer is "yes" - configuration to the hands of people. :) I'm putting a short manual on User:MiszaBot/Archive HowTo. Миша1323:26, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Can you stop archiving my talk page until I get back (probably in two weeks), because I am on Wikibreak. Thanks! Real9603:50, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I'd love to (like I'd like to improve all articles on Wikipedia), but I really suck at writing articles and am much better suited to technical assistance and gnomish work. Besides, I have no idea where to get sources from to improve it. Try asking for help on our noticeboard, perhaps? :-) Миша1314:23, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Ooops
Saw your correction on my watchlist just before I got your message, sorry.... (Just can't trust people to do it themsleves :-) ). WjBscribe14:19, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I see this page has been set to be archived by Miszabot - I had thought it was polite to see if there was a consensus among the page's users before doing so? This has removed quite a lot of material that as far as I was concerned was still relevant, ongoing discussion and it will be tedious to go through and restore the relevant items. -- Kvetner22:45, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Instructions I've pointed out in various places do mention that some consensus is welcome when archiving public noticeboards. It's up to the users now, really - don't blame neither the bot nor me. You can simply revert the bot (since it's still the top contributor) and remove the template I've added here (or adjust the settings, although threads that are one month old are hardly "ongoing" to me). Миша1323:27, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Main page talk archiving
Just keeping with what bot does what: Even though the main page talk is actually in the talk mainspace, shouldn't MiszaBotII be archiving it, since it's Wikipedia related? --TeckWizParlateContribs@00:53, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
In an ideal world, it should, and it did back when each bot read the full configuration from a file given to it. Now they all work via backlinks to User:MiszaBot/config and I can only restrict each one to one namespace or one page, but cannot ban a bot from editing a page. Yet. Миша1309:46, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
There is a malfunction of your bot's service. Its edit summary indicates that my posts are transferred from my talk page to a special file called "/dev/null". Could you fix it? — zero»03:02, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Because it's not just "formatting" - the options need to be given line-by-line, not smashed together. Otherwise, the bot won't fine a line named "|archive=" and assume you want the posts to go to nowhere. It's not the bot's malfunction, maybe I haven't made myself clear enough on the instructions page. Миша1309:25, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Bot?
Hi - got a bot running un books in your name - User:MiszaBot - misplacing categories at present. Reverted and blocked for now - thanks --Herbytalk thyme11:01, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks - digging a bit - looks like a few vandal bots created. IP here has a W o W reference too! Indef blocked the bot - thanks for the help - cheers --Herbytalk thyme11:23, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Documentation?
Can you add some documentation on how us mortals can edit things like
Thanks for your quick reply, and sorry for my stupididy in the first posting. ffm✎talk
There are no stupid questions - only answers and it btw helped me spot that some evil anon broke the config. (I'd spot that from error logs, but anyway...) Миша1320:38, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hey, thanks for spotting that mistake in the talk page template, I swear, I'm going insane ;) I swore about 5 times I checked it for obvious stuff as well! Thanks again --NigelJtalk12:56, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
