Please stop adding superfluous links about propaganda to every Taiwan-related article. If a link doesn't fit in to the text, then there's usually no need for a link. Mark112:29, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Please read and understand Wikipedia's NPOV policy regarding our treatment of controversial topics. Your current POV-pushing is nothing but a waste of time for everyone involved.
Also, if you are dissatisfied with the efforts of other Wikipedia contributors, you could perhaps exhibit your doubtlessly superior English skills by making the corrections yourself, rather than making vaguely disparaging comments, and then reverting to a version that multiple users have agreed to be POV.
Um, no, you were reverting my edits wholesale. For example:
distrust due to political, cultural and linguistic differences -> distrust due to political, cultural and lingual differences
with government workers, such as teachers, being required to become KMT members, -> with government workers, such as teachers, requiring membership into the KMT
You wholesaled three times. [1][2][3] In every single one of those reverts, you were pushing the island nation POV, you were reverting away all of those articles ("a" and "the") that I had painstakingly inserted, and you were replacing the word "linguistic" with "lingual". Do you serious believe that "lingual differences" is better than "linguistic differences"?
You "attempt to discuss" consisted of:
Vague disparaging comment on my talk page;
Wholesale revert of all of my edits, articles included;
You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three-revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future. The duration of the block[4] is 24 hours. Here are the reverts in question[5]. (ESkog)(Talk)12:27, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
