User talk:Philosopher/Archive 27
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Philosopher. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 20 | ← | Archive 25 | Archive 26 | Archive 27 | Archive 28 | Archive 29 | Archive 30 |
Thank you for the warm welcome!
You aren't by chance attending Wikimania 2013? If you are I'll shake your hand in person during lunch today. :-) DrewHeath (talk) 23:47, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, I wasn't able to make it to Wikimania 2013, though I was in the PRC earlier this year. The timing just didn't work out. Oh, well. Perhaps things'll work out better for Wikimania 2014 and I'll see you then? Happy editing! – Philosopher Let us reason together. 00:02, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.
IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.
Changes to SuggestBot's suggestions
We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:
- Views/Day
- Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.
- Quality
- Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.
The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:
- Content
- Is more content needed?
- Headings
- Does this article have an appropriate section structure?
- Images
- Is the number of illustrative images about right?
- Links
- Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?
- Sources
- For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:02, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
Request Help to Make Article Live
I have a notable article with references that want to make live. Wiki administrators could delete it, so I'm trying to head that off. Any advice or assistance would be great.
My article is in my Sandbox right now. Here is the link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Nrwjones/sandbox.
Thanks for the help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nrwjones (talk • contribs) 11:55, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
- Sorry for my late reply. The biggest problem I see with the article is that it doesn't yet demonstrate its subject's notability. Basically, what makes Qubole special? Has it been widely discussed by the media? Are there any books about it? Do significant companies/individuals do business with it? Just answering one of these questions may not be quite enough, see our notability policy for the actual rules, but they are a good starting point for expanding your draft article. – Philosopher Let us reason together. 23:45, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
Bradley Manning
I am editing from phone so I made so errors my other edits were in error but I'm correct in adding that he is a former soldier as once he was convicted and dishonorably discharged he became a former soldier. Also please leave any messages you have for me on my talk please do not leave messages for me on your talk as I will probably not see them thank you very much I can't properly sign this since I'm on my phone. TucsonDavid
- Sorry for my late reply, but if you are having troubles over whether to call Manning a "former" soldier or not, you should probably discuss it on the talk page to try to reach an agreement there. Given the contentious editing on that article and my limited internet access, I'm avoiding it for the time being. – Philosopher Let us reason together. 23:39, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Natalie Tran
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Natalie Tran. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 21:15, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
Article Feedback Tool update
Hey Philosopher. I'm contacting you because you're involved in the Article Feedback Tool in some way, either as a previous newsletter recipient or as an active user of the system. As you might have heard, a user recently anonymously disabled the feedback tool on 2,000 pages. We were unable to track or prevent this due to the lack of logging feature in AFT5. We're deeply sorry for this, as we know that quite a few users found the software very useful, and were using it on their articles.
We've now re-released the software, with the addition of a logging feature and restrictions on the ability to disable. Obviously, we're not going to automatically re-enable it on each article—we don't want to create a situation where it was enabled by users who have now moved on, and feedback would sit there unattended—but if you're interested in enabling it for your articles, it's pretty simple to do. Just go to the article you want to enable it on, click the "request feedback" link in the toolbox in the sidebar, and AFT5 will be enabled for that article.
Again, we're very sorry about this issue; hopefully it'll be smooth sailing after this :). If you have any questions, just drop them at the talkpage. Thanks! Okeyes (WMF) 22:09, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
Precious
reason together
Thank you, WikiDragon, for quality articles on scientific background on former Iowa legislators, for being happy to have users whose "English isn't so good!", for "just wait", for reasoning with logic for fairness, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!
Please comment on Talk:Santiago B. Villafania
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Santiago B. Villafania. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:56, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.
IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.
Changes to SuggestBot's suggestions
We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:
- Views/Day
- Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.
- Quality
- Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.
The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:
- Content
- Is more content needed?
- Headings
- Does this article have an appropriate section structure?
- Images
- Is the number of illustrative images about right?
- Links
- Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?
- Sources
- For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:39, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
Talkback from Technical 13
Message added 13:52, 19 September 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Notifying all users that were involved in the same discussion a few weeks ago which involved deletion of this category. Technical 13 (talk) 13:52, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.
IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.
Changes to SuggestBot's suggestions
We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:
- Views/Day
- Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.
- Quality
- Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.
The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:
- Content
- Is more content needed?
- Headings
- Does this article have an appropriate section structure?
- Images
- Is the number of illustrative images about right?
- Links
- Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?
- Sources
- For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:29, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Aaron Swartz
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Aaron Swartz. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
WikiCup award
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, pleaseconsult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:33, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Vladimir Putin
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Vladimir Putin. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:04, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
Merge Article
Hello! Im knew in wikipedia please i; d like to ask you a question, about how i can refer a merge for an article! Thank you! --FlameOranges (talk) 02:07, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
- It looks like you've figured it out. If you need any particular help, let me know - I'm only on every few days currently, so my responses may be a bit slow. – Philosopher Let us reason together. 23:22, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
Creating an Article
Hello, I would like to know if you know of any pages that need to be created, as I would very much like to create one. It would be greatly appreciated if you could help me in this endeavor. Thanks, 3.14Master (talk) 15:24, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
Iowa Congress
What are we aloud to do regarding pictures of the congressmen? Can we use their official picture, or will that get us in copyright trouble? --Studlaff (talk) 22:40, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
- For the United States Congress, you can use official pictures, but be sure to tag them as {{pd-usgov}} when you upload them. For pictures of the IOwa General Assemly, you can use the low-resolution (but not the high-resolution) official photos, but you should upload those to Wikimedia Commons (Wikipedia's media repository) and tag them with {{Iowa General Assembly official portrait permission}}. Many official photos of Iowan politicians are already available at commons:Category:Official Portraits of Members of the Iowa General Assembly. – Philosopher Let us reason together. 19:19, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:49, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Geoff Morrell
Hi Philosopher. My name is Arturo and I work for BP. I am the company's official representative here on Wikipedia and I'm looking for help with a BP-related article that I thought might relate to your interests. Perhaps you've seen my message on the Wikiproject Biography talk page, but if not, I'm looking for someone who can help make a few updates to the Geoff Morrell (spokesperson) article.
Geoff is the former Press Secretary of the Department of Defense and is currently BP's senior vice president of US communications and external affairs. I saw your name on the list of members of Wikiproject Biography and your note saying you are interested in politics and government, so I thought that maybe Geoff's article is something you could help with. The main request is on the article's talk page. I hope you'll have a moment to look at it. Thanks. Arturo at BP (talk) 15:49, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
- User:Arturo at BP: Sorry for the delayed reply - it looks like User:Johnbod is handling things well for now. If you have any further issues, I'd be glad to help, but may not be able to reply in a very timely manner, unfortunately. – Philosopher Let us reason together. 19:10, 13 December 2013 (UTC)