User talk:Scarlet Robin

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. PCHS-NJROTC ^(Messages) 18:04, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

Did you write that stuff about Charlotte HS? Scarlet Robin (talk) 04:08, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

Hello. As has been pointed out to you before we are not in the slightest bit interested. Please take your complaint to Urban Facebook or somewhere else. This is an encyclopaedia. Thanks. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 19:42, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

Are you sure you don't care? Not even a little bit? If you don't care why won't you ask PCHS-NJROTC about it? If he says its not him I'll go away. If he says it is him then maybe you SHOULD care. Scarlet Robin (talk) 04:07, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

The lady doth protest too much, methinks. Are your actions not the typical Tarpon paradigm? Impersonating Lemon Bay cheerleaders, making libelous blogs (with at least half of it being blatantly inaccurate, and the other half being half truths), vandalizing Wikipedia, and otherwise trolling doesn't help your school's reputation now does it? PCHS-NJROTC ^(Messages) 00:34, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

How am I impersonating anyone? I never said I was a Lemon Bay cheerleader. I don't go to any of those schools. I haven't vandalized Wikipedia. I just wanted to ask you about what was on that blog. You banned my other account and no one would tell me why so I made a new one. Why does Wikipedia let you control the page about Charlotte High SChool when you write on Facebook and urban dictionary that there cheerleaders are anorexic whores and stuff like that? It isn't right. Scarlet Robin (talk) 12:50, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

Hehehe, the lady can't help but to protest can she? As a matter of fact, Wikipedia doesn't let anyone control an article other than in rare cases where the Wikimedia Foundation or User:Jimbo Wales must step in. I must congratulate you on your excellence in the field of creeping/cyberstalking and nit picking the most radical of statements I've ever made while conveniently ignoring the number of friends from your school that appear in my friends lists on social networking sites that you've no doubt examined with a fine tooth comb, including two cheerleaders at Charlotte High. I almost have to wonder if you're a school student or professional journalist. Also, I didn't write all of that stuff on Urban Dictionary, but part of it. Alas, you can go ahead and continue to Plaxico yourself if you'd like while further proving the Tarpon Paradigm. PCHS-NJROTC ^(Messages) 14:21, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

Are you stupid?? I just said I didn't go to any of those schools! It's NOT my blog. That's why I wanted to ask you about what it said. Read what it says on urban dictionary about Charlotte High School. Are you saying you wrote that or that you didn't write that? Because the person that wrote it also wrote stuff about grawp and tarpons. Which was written ON THE SAME DAY that your account wrote their stuff. What part of it are you saying you didn't write? Why did you tell people on Wikipedia to go and look at it if you didn't write it? Scarlet Robin (talk) 21:30, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

I wrote part of it (also note that I was not the first to write about CHS there), but I linked to it because other people (who appear to attend that school) made comments critical of the school. You claim to not be affilated with any of the local schools or that blog, but your userpage consists of a picture of a tarpon, kind of like how you sign your comments at your blog with T*A*R*P*O*N*S. The link to urban dictionary has been archived for several weeks, therefore, you must be a sockpuppet, perhaps of User:LBHS Cheerleader. PCHS-NJROTC ^(Messages) 21:48, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

It won't let me put what it says at urban dictionary and when I try to report the error it syas I'm blocked! How can I report the error if I'm blocked?? Scarlet Robin (talk) 21:32, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

There is no error; the filters are performing as they are supposed to. PCHS-NJROTC ^(Messages) 21:48, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Scarlet Robin (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

No one ever explained to me why they blocked my Luna 9 account. I didn't vandalize anything. I was just trying to ask PCHS-NJROTC a question. Now he has admitted here that he wrote stuff about Charlotte High School cheerleaders being anorexic whores. Please unban me. Thanks!

Decline reason:

You were blocked as a sockpuppet, you admit to being a sockpuppet and you make an unfounded bad faith accusation against another editor. All in one unblock request. So, no, you are not being unblocked. Smashville^talk 22:37, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

• I object to that; I have never written about Charlotte High School cheerleaders on Wikipedia whatsoever, nor did I "admit" to such. You are not banned, but you are blocked. You will likely not be unblocked because what you are doing is WP:OUTING and WP:TROLLING; your reasons for wanting to be unblocked are not aligned with the goals of this encyclopedia project. It was explained at User talk:Luna 9 why you are blocked, and you lost talk page access there because you refused to listen. PCHS-NJROTC ^(Messages) 21:48, 16 February 2010 (UTC)