User talk:SimonEast

Welcome

Hello Simon, welcome to Wikipedia. Thanks for all your contributions so far. Judging by your user page... you really should get that skin condition looked at!

You might find these links helpful in editing pages or creating new ones: Tutorial, How to edit a page, Naming conventions, Manual of Style. You should probably read our policies at some point too.

But don't feel you have to read every policy document before you do anything. Dive in, be bold in editing, and if you do anything wrong, someone will be quick to correct it and let you know (hopefully, politely!)

If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian. -- ALargeElk | Talk 10:15, 17 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Welcome to the 'pedia! Are you the same guy that used to edit at DMOZ? Ambivalenthysteria 08:46, 18 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Yeah, that's me. How'd you notice me on here? I'm pretty new, but love the concept of this thing. I just hope I don't get too addicted like I did with DMOZ; eventually left that because it took up too much time. Did you have a different username on DMOZ? -- SimonEast 09:35, 18 Jun 2004 (UTC)

I'm from Vic too, so I had some of the articles you edited on my watchlist, and recognised the username. I have the same name on DMOZ, but I've hardly edited in about six months. Ambivalenthysteria 11:08, 18 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Nice work with the photos! There's a lot of Melbourne articles in need of them. I need to get my digital camera back - I'd taken nice ones of Flinders Street Station and a couple of other places, and then my brother borrowed and wiped it, and still hasn't given it back. Ambivalenthysteria 10:02, 21 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Thanks! Check my contributions to see what I've added (airport, Ashburton station, Swinburne Uni). Got more to come too. I've uploaded them all as "public domain" - I don't mind if they get copied. Is this the best copyright notice to use? — SimonEast 10:05, 21 Jun 2004 (UTC)

That's the one. :) Ambivalenthysteria 10:06, 21 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Melbourne articles

Hey there, I don't know if you've checked up on the WikiProject Melbourne recently, but a few of us have decided to adopt an article or two. The idea is to pick a lacking article and "be in charge" of it - do the research, writing, maybe even picture-taking. We're trying to build up the number of qualiy articles, instead of thinly-spread stubs. Don't feel you have to do anything :), but if you want, pick an article and add yourself to the list. TPK 20:51, 14 Sep 2004 (UTC) Talk

Universal Serial Bus

The reverts were accidental, I didn't even notice it until you mentioned it. I have reverted myself. The only edits I intended to do was to remove some <small> tags that were making some text too small to read. I think it may of been a problem with MediaWiki, it's been known to revert things accidentally sometimes. Norm 15:25, 16 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Template:SimonEastPhoto

The "high resolution" bit is poorly phrased; I'd recomend changing "-for commercial use this may incur a small fee." to "-commercial use of the high resolution version (although not the version here) may incur a small fee.", or something of the like. Thanks,
Luc "Somethingorother" French 08:47, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Panorama photos

Hi Simon, I noticed your panorama image of Canberra from Telstra Tower on that page. I noticed the darkness on the sky varies. What software do you use for stitching? I thought I'd suggest to you that you try restitching the image with AutoStitch as I have had much better success with that program than I have for any other. -- Chuq 07:06, 10 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Meetup in March

I see that you are listed as a participant in the WikiProject Melbourne. If you are a Melbourne resident I would appreciate your views on the suggested Meetup in March . Please give some indication of your interest, or otherwise, in the idea. Even a simple "No thanks" with your user name would be welcome and assist in assessing the level of support for a meetup. Thank you.. Cuddy Wifter 06:30, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Panorama of Canberra again

Hi Simon, as did Chuq, I noticed that there were some stitching faults with the panorama. I was wondering if you would be prepared to send me the originals as I may be able to re-stitch with better blending. If so, please leave me a message on my talk page or send me an email (go to my talk page and click on 'email this user' in the toolbox on the left). Thanks in advance. Diliff | (Talk) (Contribs) 18:54, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Russell Evans

An editor has nominated Russell Evans, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Russell Evans (2nd nomination) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 11:29, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Brother Yun - The Heavenly Man.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Brother Yun - The Heavenly Man.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --23:52, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Photos by SimonEast

Category:Photos by SimonEast, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. VegaDark (talk) 00:24, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Software Requirements Specification

The article Software Requirements Specification has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Content already at Requirements_analysis#Software_requirements_specification + how-to write an SRS document. Should become a redirect.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. M4gnum0n (talk) 07:58, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:SimonEastPhoto

Template:SimonEastPhoto has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. WOSlinker (talk) 19:19, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer have them marked as minor by default.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you are familiar with the contents of WP:MINOR, and believe that it is still beneficial to the encyclopedia to have all your edits marked as such by default, then this discussion will give you the details you need to continue with this functionality indefinitely. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 18:40, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

July WMAU Melbourne Meetup

Hi, At last month's June meetup we discussed the idea of setting up a Training Course at a University of the Third Age (U3A) to be held in 2013 and named Becoming a Wikipedia editor. In order to get this course up and running we are calling for volunteers to help develop the idea, and either tutor part of the course, or provide one on one help to students in the class. All local Wikipedians are welcome to discuss this at our 11am meetup to be held this Sunday on 22 July. Please add your name to the attending list at Wikipedia:Meetup/Melbourne 23. Food and beverages are provided. Cuddy Wifter (talk) 05:07, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Planetshakers 2005.jpg

Hello, SimonEast! Can you place this file to Commons? --Michael4Wiki (talk) 18:03, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Australia Act 1986

An edit for a caption to your "Photo of the Australia Act 1986 document, as located in en:Parliament House, Canberra[1]" has been discussed at Talk:Australia Act 1986 [2] and Talk:Monarchy of Australia [3]. My question is: are you able to make any comment on whether it is, as a source states, what is technically an "Assent original"?. I see your .jpg caption does not say so, and the two other articles where it has been used display their captions without that: Law of Australia, Royal sign-manual. Could it have been explained to you at the time? Or perhaps you know of an authentic and indisputable source? Qexigator (talk) 22:42, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Planetshakers 2005.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Planetshakers 2005.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:01, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cross-origin resource sharing, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stylesheets. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Swinburne University of Technology (sign).jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Swinburne University of Technology (sign).jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:39, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:17, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, SimonEast. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at Wikipedia:Teahouse § Is "post-compromise security" notable?

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Teahouse § Is "post-compromise security" notable?. {{u|Sdkb}} ^talk 06:21, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:16, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ken Duncan (photographer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ken Duncan (photographer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ken Duncan (photographer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Velella ^{Velella Talk} 22:58, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I saw your comment at the AfD. I'm not in a position to assess this one, but I think you're not helping your cause much by just making a comment. May I make two suggestions?

you need to vote keep or your comment will not be counted
pick three articles that are not interviews or wholly based on press releases and list them bullet-point style with a statement about why they support WP:NARTIST (I think this is the right guideline)

Oblivy (talk) 02:11, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]