User talk:Surten
your an idiot
- I have left this comment intact, probably because I consider amusing that such a great ammount of time was taken by the author to write it and wouldn't even manage to sign it. Yes, he is a wuss because he's not even logged in.
- I ignore the reason why this person should consider that I am an idiot, perhaps if he/she could have more specific about the subject, article or comment where I demonstrated an idiotic behavior, I could take this into consideration.
- So dig this, I have no idea who you are, Mr. 67.222.131.176, but that just doesn't help for me to care at all about what you think about me or whatever the hell I said that could be so harmful or offensive to you. It might help if you show yourself the next time, if you're stupid enough to read what I have replied. --Surten (talk) 02:43, 13 May 2008 (UTC)Surten. The means, myself.
James Horner
[edit]- [also on my own talk page] The "some believe" language currently in the article is a bit weasel-wordy, but at least it suggests third-party opinions about Horner specifically. Of course these opinions should be sourced. The content you were adding differs from this in at least two ways. First, it's unclear as to how it relates to anyone's (apart from you own) views of Horner specifically. Even if you were to source the idea, if the source does not specifically mention Horner (in which case you might be able to add something like, "John Doe, however, argues that this defense of Horner's work is flawed because..."), and instead discusses only the general practice of musically "quoting" other composers, then you could be in violation of WP:SYNTH, which prohibits "synthesis of published material which advances a position." The second problem is that, in the spirit of WP:NPOV, we shouldn't be going to great lengths to emphasize criticism over defense (or vice versa, although in the case of living individuals, WP:BLP also comes into play, so we should be especially hesitant to give extra weight to the negative). I hope this helps. Cosmic Latte (talk) 09:58, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- I'm a fan of Horner's too, but I have to say I agree with you about Troy. In case you didn't hear the story, Gabriel Yared has composed a grand, rather masterful score for it, but a test audience rejected it as too "old-fashioned" (ironic that an epic score would be rejected as too old-fashioned for an ancient epic!), and Horner was brought in at the last minute. I much prefer The Perfect Storm, Horner's previous collaboration with the same director. Anyway, I don't know much about OGG files, but you might be able to find something useful on a cnet search such as this one. Cosmic Latte (talk) 09:14, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
Super Smash Bros. Melee
[edit]Hey there. I'm afraid your edit to the article had to be reverted because YouTube is not deemed a reliable source, and so should not be used to cite information. I know the policies can be a pain in the arse sometimes, but they need to be followed—especially for FAs. Cheers anyway for taking the time to find a source. Ashnard Talk Contribs 16:01, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
journeyman project
[edit]Hi there. I apologise for the 'spam' but I hope you will be interested in this wiki.
http://journeymanproject.wikia.com/ —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.132.141.80 (talk) 01:26, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:41, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
The article Anna Karenina (soundtrack) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:NALBUM
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 21:39, 20 August 2024 (UTC)