Jump to content

User talk:Teacher2019

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, Teacher2019, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay.
I noticed you've made one or more edits to women's biographies. Should you be interested in helping to redress the balance of articles about women, you might wish to consider joining our Women in Red project. Less than 18% of biographies here are about women - and you could help us increase this!
Here are some pages you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox. Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~) This automatically inserts your name and the date. If you get stuck, please see our help pages. If you can't find what you are looking for there, feel free to ask at the Teahouse or at the Women in Red project's Talk Page. Alternatively, contact me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help you. Again, welcome! Nick Moyes (talk) 10:49, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Your submission at Articles for creation: Dr Alison Hanlon (June 30)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
AngusWOOF (barksniff) 21:25, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Teacher2019! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusWOOF (barksniff) 21:25, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

[edit]
Hello, Teacher2019. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Ariconte (talk) 10:32, 28 July 2019 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template.[reply]

"Dr."

[edit]

We wouldn't accept that in a title in any case, see MOS:DOCTOR. In fact, you should read that whole page if you haven't already as it's our manual of style for bibliographies. Doug Weller talk 14:28, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019: In-line citations are vital

[edit]

Hello Teacher2019. Your recently rejected article suffered from a lack of in-line citations, which may have been a cause for its rejection. Please read Wikipedia:Citing sources for instructions on how to format these citations. Best of luck.--Quisqualis (talk) 16:07, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alison Hanlon has been accepted

[edit]
Alison Hanlon, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MurielMary (talk) 10:50, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Finola Kerrigan (October 5)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Cerebellum was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Cerebellum (talk) 13:36, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Finola Kerrigan, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:22, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Finola Kerrigan

[edit]

Hello, Teacher2019. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Finola Kerrigan".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (📧) 16:08, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Andrew Marsden (January 3)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
qcne (talk) 12:52, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
And also the referencing tutorial at WP:INTREFVE, @Teacher2019. qcne (talk) 12:53, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Andrew Marsden (January 3)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:54, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Andrew Marsden has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Andrew Marsden. Thanks! qcne (talk) 15:56, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Teacher2019 (talk) 16:40, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have addressed recommended changes. THANK

Nomination of Annmarie Hanlon for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Annmarie Hanlon is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Annmarie Hanlon until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Moriwen (talk) 20:31, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy