User talk:Thomasmallen

On what basis do you remove the factual, and (I think) useful and helpful infomration regard Other Images from the Kitsune page. It is NPOV, correct, and informative for those who may be interested in further protrayal of kitsune? Frankatca 17:20, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

United States cities population

Can you do me a favor and find other cities that have population challenges and update them to maintain consistencey? There's likely more than one city that challenged the original releas. Thanks --Moreau36 17:27, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind. Update completed! Only St. Louis, Missouri needed to be revised

Source for list of challenges: http://www.census.gov/popest/archives/2000s/2005/05s_challenges.html

--Moreau36 18:32, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lyon Village

In urban counties and independent cities, neighborhoods are treated as unincorporated communities hence Virginia being added to the end. In the case of Lyon Village, I'm sure there is another Lyon Village elsewhere in the United States so it is probably necessary to differentiate it from the others. Look at Virginia Beach, Suffolk, and Chesapeake. --Caponer 21:25, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AfD Nomination: Rest of Virginia

I've nominated the article Rest of Virginia for deletion under the Articles for deletion process. We appreciate your contributions, but in this particular case I do not feel that Rest of Virginia satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. I have explained why in the nomination space (see What Wikipedia is not and Deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rest of Virginia. Don't forget to add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of each of your comments to sign them. You are free to edit the content of Rest of Virginia during the discussion, but please do not remove the "Articles for Deletion" template (the box at the top). Doing so will not end the discussion. --Takeel 15:04, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Eddy Curry Line

There's all of 165 hits for "Eddy Curry Line", with only 17 of them being unique on Google. The statistic fails WP:Notability and has failed to gain mainstream usage outside of Matt Buser. Discussion forums do not count as reliable sources. I could have simply speedy deleted it per WP:Speedy-Articles, Point 7, but instead I speedy re-directed it to Eddy Curry. Unless the statistic gains greater popularity and usage among other sports journalists, it's essentially non-notable. --Madchester 07:14, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Straw poll

You expressed opinions on the reordering of Cho Seung-hui's name. Please vote in the straw poll on renaming him in Wikipedia here. --Dynaflow 06:43, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:IRapcat.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:IRapcat.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 14:22, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oz Linux

or now Oz Enterprise, didn't survive it's AfD here. Therefore, it's been deleted as a repost. You are best to take this to Deletion review --Steve _(Stephen)^talk 00:06, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Harold and Inge Marcus Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- Basar (talk · contribs) 04:07, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I thought it was sorta funny. Thomasmallen (talk) 08:39, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:List of countries by GDP (nominal)#Informal mediation

Hi - you're invited to join in a discussion on the inclusion of the EU in the List of countries by GDP (nominal) article. Regards SilkTork *^YES! 23:13, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:List_of_countries_by_GDP_(nominal)#Conclusion

The Mediation discussion regarding the inclusion of the EU in List of countries by GDP (nominal) has come to a conclusion with the following result:

The EU to remain in List of countries by GDP (nominal).
The EU to be positioned according to GDP rank between World and USA.
No consensus on the EU appearing in all three charts. By convention this means the situation would remain as current - that is the EU remains on all three charts.
Data for the EU on each chart to only be given if sourced, otherwise a dash to replace the data.
Explanation to be placed in the lead section for the appearance of the EU and other non-countries. Possible wording: "Several economies which are not ~~normally~~ considered to be countries are included in the list because they appear in the sources. These economies are not ranked in the charts here, but are listed in sequence by GDP for comparison."
The List retains the current name.
A suggestion by Tomeasy that I feel should be carried out is that the sister articles are given the same treatment as agreed above.

Unless there are significant disagreements within the next 48 hours I will be closing the Mediation. Any questions, please get in touch. Regards SilkTork *^YES! 10:49, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Rapcat.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Rapcat.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:44, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

barnstar

		The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
		For laudible work stopping a vandal-fest on Militia occupation of the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge. LavaBaron (talk) 00:44, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:SaferChandelle.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:SaferChandelle.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. © Tbhotch^™ (en-2.5). 00:27, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Thomasmallen. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:FairfaxConnector

Template:FairfaxConnector has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 20:14, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:BaltimoreMetroArea.png

The file File:BaltimoreMetroArea.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]