User talk:Vrxces
This is Vrxces's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Archives (Index) |
This page is archived by ClueBot III.
|
Concern regarding Draft:The Roottrees Are Dead
[edit]Hello, Vrxces. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Roottrees Are Dead, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:10, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
DYK?
[edit]Hi, I saw the article you recently made He Fucked the Girl Out of Me and I think it may be worth nominating for WP:DYK, would it be ok if I went ahead and nom'd it (or if you simply did it yourself)? Iostn (talk) 19:47, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
- Go for it! What's the hook? VRXCES (talk) 20:20, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
- Haven't actually written it, I'll come up with one when I get round to nomming it I think Iostn (talk) 21:06, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Twitter link in your profile
[edit]Hello! I was looking at an article you worked on and followed a link back to your profile. The last sentence of it has a link to your Twitter account, but looks like you deleted that. :) ThistleChaser (talk) 19:29, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oh damn! Good pick up. Which article was that? I should probably find a way to get rid of that. VRXCES (talk) 22:13, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry for the delay in replying! The link is here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Vrxces The last sentence is "You can find me on twitter." with a link to it. ThistleChaser (talk) 03:38, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:The Legend of Zelda: Link's Awakening DX
[edit]Hello, Vrxces. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "The Legend of Zelda: Link's Awakening DX".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 02:24, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:A Living Commodity
[edit]Hello, Vrxces. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "A Living Commodity".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 03:42, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
Backyard Football Draft
[edit]Hey. I just found out you declined my draft. Really sorry I missed a few details. I've just been having trouble finding sources related to Backyard Football. Most Backyard Sports-related articles are related to Baseball instead (I was lucky that How Backyard Baseball Became a Cult Classic had a brief mention about Backyard Football preceding Backyard Baseball 2001 and the fact that the former was the first to include pro players before the latter). And the reason I only had one review listed was because that was the only one I could find. I found that review on Mobygames, but there were only three other reviews; two of them didn't even let me onto their archived websites and the other one just didn't look reliable enough. Besides, the game isn't even on Metacritic; the only versions available on there are the GameCube version and the 2010 version. 2603:6010:8B00:44FF:C536:DF6B:1EB6:F37B (talk) 13:54, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- After you declined my Backyard Football draft, I started looking for more places and wanted to personally ask you, do you personally think that any of the BYF reviews on GameSpot might be notable enough to add? 2603:6010:8B00:44FF:C536:DF6B:1EB6:F37B (talk) 18:16, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Could you shoot me the link of the GameSpot review? The Allgame review would be definitely reliable - none of the Mac magazines are listed as RS but could be decent reviews if the content is alright. VRXCES (talk) 08:40, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- [1][2]
- These are the only GameSpot reviews that are related to the original 1999 BYF (the others are either related to the GBA or GC versions). Also, the Allgame review is offline, and I don't know if I could find the full thing. 2603:6010:8B00:44FF:31E4:4606:ECC:9966 (talk) 22:12, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- V R X C E S, are you there? 2603:6010:8B00:44FF:849D:3C14:8056:3DCB (talk) 00:26, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry for the delay - unfortunately, the GameSpot reviews are actually GameFAQs user reviews which are WP:USERG and not reliable under WP:VG/S. These are just random people reviewing the game. I thought you meant GameSpot reviewer articles. I reckon the Internet Archive and some sleuthing could salvage the other print/web reviews. VRXCES (talk) 00:41, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
- I see. I guess we'll just have to wait until the release of its remaster to find more reliable sources. 2603:6010:8B00:44FF:60DF:4591:D68D:E4AA (talk) 21:57, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry for the delay - unfortunately, the GameSpot reviews are actually GameFAQs user reviews which are WP:USERG and not reliable under WP:VG/S. These are just random people reviewing the game. I thought you meant GameSpot reviewer articles. I reckon the Internet Archive and some sleuthing could salvage the other print/web reviews. VRXCES (talk) 00:41, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
- V R X C E S, are you there? 2603:6010:8B00:44FF:849D:3C14:8056:3DCB (talk) 00:26, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
- Could you shoot me the link of the GameSpot review? The Allgame review would be definitely reliable - none of the Mac magazines are listed as RS but could be decent reviews if the content is alright. VRXCES (talk) 08:40, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Anthology of the Killer
[edit]Hello, Vrxces. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Anthology of the Killer, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:07, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
Improvements to Address Notability and Tone for Gamezop Draft
[edit]Thank you, VRXCES, for your feedback. I’ve thoroughly revised the Gamezop draft to address both the WP and WP concerns. I’ve removed business jargon and promotional language to ensure a neutral tone. Additionally, I’ve organized the references to highlight the in-depth, independent sources more clearly. Please feel free to review and let me know if further improvements are needed. Morekiranwiki (talk) 14:34, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article SimsVille you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Cambalachero -- Cambalachero (talk) 20:06, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
The article SimsVille you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:SimsVille for comments about the article, and Talk:SimsVille/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Cambalachero -- Cambalachero (talk) 17:21, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
DYK for He Fucked the Girl Out of Me
[edit]On 20 November 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article He Fucked the Girl Out of Me, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a review described He Fucked the Girl Out of Me as being about "all the ways in which American society fails its most vulnerable"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/He Fucked the Girl Out of Me. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, He Fucked the Girl Out of Me), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
1=Launchballer 00:02, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Hook update | ||
Your hook reached 29,262 views (1,219.2 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of November 2024 – nice work! |
GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 03:29, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Super Mario Bros. Deluxe
[edit]Hello, Vrxces. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Super Mario Bros. Deluxe, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:07, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Anthology of the Killer
[edit]Hello, Vrxces. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Anthology of the Killer".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 03:13, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
Hi! While not my Draft I decided to take a crack at this and adde some sources :) More reviews are listed at MobyGames [3] Timur9008 (talk) 17:42, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- Nice work mate! This was a draftified article for me, so I wasn't behind creating or writing it. VRXCES (talk) 22:48, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
New pages patrol January 2025 Backlog drive
[edit]January 2025 Backlog Drive | New pages patrol | |
| |
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:54, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Super Mario Bros. Deluxe
[edit]Hello, Vrxces. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Super Mario Bros. Deluxe".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 17:39, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
Draft:Pinball FX
[edit]Hello, thanks for your input. I've started by editing the Reception section by adding the Metacritic link and 2 more reviews. Also changed the sentence about Steam reviews.
I was wondering if the gameplay section should be less detailed and condensed down to about 3 sentences?
That table list certainly is quite long, but could be useful to some. There is a similar table on the Pinball FX3 page (Pinball FX 3). [as an aside, that page should be called Pinball FX3 rather than Pinball FX 3 - is that something you can tweak?] Should it be a collapsible table rather than one that shows by default?
This was triggered by someone on a discord asking why there wasn't a Pinball FX wikipedia page when all the other notable pinball games have one, and timing happened to be on a day I wasn't doing anything. I've had some assistance from 2 others who also play it. Wilbers (talk) 17:07, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- No stress mate, I know the notability process is a bit inscrutable and can come off as cold to editors trying to help. I think the best thing that can demonstrate the game meets the WP:GNG is finding multiple review sources from those identified as reliable on WP:VG/S. Three of these tend to be a clear, irrefutable case for the game being notable. You may find evidence for these from sites like Metacritic, Mobygames, Google News or the Internet Archive. It's important to note that some reviews included are just blogs or unreliable websites that may not help a case for notability. Can chat about the other stuff too. VRXCES (talk) 22:07, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- I have been through that list of reliable sources. Out of those there is a review on pushsquare, an article on gamespot, and a video interview on shacknews, https://www.shacknews.com/article/135662/zen-studios-pinball-fx-video-interview. I've added the first 2 to the draft, but not the interview yet.
- There was also a Polygon article explaining what the ticket system was, so I've added a citation to that in a suitable place. Wilbers (talk) 00:31, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Awesome! Push Square is a good source. I've also found situational review sources in Softpedia [4] and Gaming Age [5] as well as an inconclusive one in PS Universe [6] so I think this will not be too controversially notable. The other issues with the article are not as major and wouldn't as seriously prevent a draft from getting across the line. VRXCES (talk) 04:20, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks a lot, I've added all of those to it. Is the reception section now acceptable? Wilbers (talk) 09:55, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, the article now has enough sourcing to suggest it's a notable game. There's still a lot of cleanup needed to conform the article with the manual of style for video games, particularly excessive detail and non-neutral prose and I'm happy to help edit and cut some things that would likely be removed pre-publication if that would help. Otherwise, can pass and others can fix it later as it's notable at this point. VRXCES (talk) 21:37, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- Great. There certainly is a lot in that manual of style, and I've only properly looked through the first third of it. The non-neutral aspect is one I'd struggle to fix myself, and some of the detail I'm not sure what to keep or not. The long table will need to remain (albeit moved within the article and/or made collapsible if that is how it would typically be presented) as its the only way to fit all those wikilinks in which will be helpful for the pinball WikiProject. Wilbers (talk) 23:52, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- No worries, at any rate, can give some pointers but happy to pass the draft. One minor note - as there's already a game called Pinball FX, might prompt a move to Pinball FX (2023 video game). On non-neutrality, can remove a few flagrant things like endorsements of third-party sources etc. Otherwise, feel free to resubmit! VRXCES (talk) 23:59, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks, its had some more edits, with the gameplay section substantially reduced. I've just resubmitted it. Wilbers (talk) 10:18, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Done - it's now Pinball FX (2023 video game). Congrats! I've added some tags to the article for other editors to cleanup, but these aren't issues that should affect the article's publication now that the review content is in there. Thanks for your patience on this one. VRXCES (talk) 21:08, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks, its had some more edits, with the gameplay section substantially reduced. I've just resubmitted it. Wilbers (talk) 10:18, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- No worries, at any rate, can give some pointers but happy to pass the draft. One minor note - as there's already a game called Pinball FX, might prompt a move to Pinball FX (2023 video game). On non-neutrality, can remove a few flagrant things like endorsements of third-party sources etc. Otherwise, feel free to resubmit! VRXCES (talk) 23:59, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- Great. There certainly is a lot in that manual of style, and I've only properly looked through the first third of it. The non-neutral aspect is one I'd struggle to fix myself, and some of the detail I'm not sure what to keep or not. The long table will need to remain (albeit moved within the article and/or made collapsible if that is how it would typically be presented) as its the only way to fit all those wikilinks in which will be helpful for the pinball WikiProject. Wilbers (talk) 23:52, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, the article now has enough sourcing to suggest it's a notable game. There's still a lot of cleanup needed to conform the article with the manual of style for video games, particularly excessive detail and non-neutral prose and I'm happy to help edit and cut some things that would likely be removed pre-publication if that would help. Otherwise, can pass and others can fix it later as it's notable at this point. VRXCES (talk) 21:37, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks a lot, I've added all of those to it. Is the reception section now acceptable? Wilbers (talk) 09:55, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Awesome! Push Square is a good source. I've also found situational review sources in Softpedia [4] and Gaming Age [5] as well as an inconclusive one in PS Universe [6] so I think this will not be too controversially notable. The other issues with the article are not as major and wouldn't as seriously prevent a draft from getting across the line. VRXCES (talk) 04:20, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
Happy Holidays
[edit]
Timur9008 (talk) is wishing you Happy Holidays! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user Happy Holidays, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!
Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Happy holidays}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Timur9008 (talk) 07:50, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
Go Home Annie
[edit]Hello, I've significantly expanded the article at Draft:Go_Home_Annie with new souces and info. If it's ready it would be nice to review it now, as to avoid waiting time. Merry Christmas and have a happy new year. Kiksam (talk) 15:35, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- You too mate. The standard for WP:GNG for games typically requires a few reliable reviews to demonstrate notability, from sources like those in WP:VG/S. Can you find other reliable sources out there? All I can find is SECTOR.sk [7] and Thumb Culture [8] which are both not assessed for reliability. Those probably are a bit borderline for me, but are probably enough to pass draft and not raise any issues. If you're able to find any other reliable WP:NONENG coverage that would be really good. VRXCES (talk) 21:34, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Unsighted you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of A412 -- A412 (talk) 06:45, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
The article Unsighted you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Unsighted and Talk:Unsighted/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of A412 -- A412 (talk) 08:24, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
The article Unsighted you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Unsighted for comments about the article, and Talk:Unsighted/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of A412 -- A412 (talk) 08:03, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
Skip Barber Racing (video game) gameplay screenshot
[edit]Hi! :) Can you help add a screenshot to the gameplay section for Skip Barber Racing (video game)? (some are here [9]) [10].
Happy New year BTW! :D Timur9008 (talk) 12:49, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Happy to - let me know if you need any other help with articles! VRXCES (talk) 20:24, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks! Do you think the article can be considered start class now? Timur9008 (talk) 03:29, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Yes, I've upgraded it accordingly! VRXCES (talk) 03:38, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks! Do you think the article can be considered start class now? Timur9008 (talk) 03:29, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
Can you help with expanding [11]? Also, I think the main Bethesda Softworks article can be considered a B class, not C. What do you think? I've been expanding it for quite some time. Timur9008 (talk) 18:08, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Schim you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of A412 -- A412 (talk) 04:43, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
New page reviewer granted
[edit]Hi Vrxces, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the new page reviewer user right to your account. This means you now have access to the page curation tools and can start patrolling pages from the new pages feed. If you asked for this at requests for permissions, please check back there to see if your access is time-limited or if there are other comments.
This is a good time to re-acquaint yourself with the guidance at Wikipedia:New pages patrol. Before you get started, please take the time to:
- Add Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers to your watchlist to follow NPP-related discussions
- If you use Twinkle, configure it to log your CSDs and PRODs
- If you can read any languages other than English, add yourself to the list of reviewers with language proficiencies
You can find a list of other useful links and tools for patrollers at Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Resources. If you are ever unsure what to do, ask your fellow patrollers or just leave the page for someone else to review – you're not alone! Fathoms Below (talk) 21:24, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
The article Schim you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Schim and Talk:Schim/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of A412 -- A412 (talk) 20:06, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Moida Mansion
[edit]Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Moida Mansion you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of BigLordFlash -- BigLordFlash (talk) 22:23, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
The article Schim you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Schim for comments about the article, and Talk:Schim/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of A412 -- A412 (talk) 09:25, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Moida Mansion
[edit]The article Moida Mansion you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Moida Mansion and Talk:Moida Mansion/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of BigLordFlash -- BigLordFlash (talk) 22:46, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
DYK for Glucoboy
[edit]On 10 January 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Glucoboy, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Glucoboy was advertised as the "first medical device to interface with a Nintendo Game Boy"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/GlucoBoy. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Glucoboy), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Amakuru (talk) 00:03, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of The Sims: Livin' Large
[edit]Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Sims: Livin' Large you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of LEvalyn -- LEvalyn (talk) 09:05, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Moida Mansion
[edit]The article Moida Mansion you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Moida Mansion for comments about the article, and Talk:Moida Mansion/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of BigLordFlash -- BigLordFlash (talk) 13:46, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of The Sims: Livin' Large
[edit]The article The Sims: Livin' Large you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Sims: Livin' Large for comments about the article, and Talk:The Sims: Livin' Large/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of LEvalyn -- LEvalyn (talk) 00:07, 13 January 2025 (UTC)