Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cody Brundage

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:30, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

Cody Brundage

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Cody Brundage (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NMMA. Never previously ranked in Sherdog's top 10, nor has he been ranked inside FightMatrix's top 10, with his highest ranking being 99th. ♡RAFAEL♡^(talk) 22:12, 9 July 2022 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Martial arts, and Michigan. Shellwood (talk) 23:05, 9 July 2022 (UTC)

His third UFC fight takes place today (July 9) I thought previously 3 UFC fights was sufficient for MMA fighter notability? There are tons of UFC fighter pages who have never been ranked in the top 10 of their weight classes. Keenlycurious (talk) 00:25, 10 July 2022 (UTC)

• I don't think this should be deleted. He is fighting in the prelim main event of UFC today. Marty2Hotty (talk) 00:30, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
• Comment The 3 fight rule for passing WP:NMMA was changed some time ago, I advise everyone to read the guidelines. ♡RAFAEL♡^(talk) 01:16, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
• Comment Per WP:NSPORTS, which WP:NMMA is part of, all athletes must have the significant coverage to pass WP:GNG regardless of any appearances or how high they rank on some lists. Alvaldi (talk) 16:50, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:19, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

• Delete I searched and couldn't find multiple articles with significant independent coverage in reliable sources. I found lots of fight reporting and the article in the Jiu-Jitsu Times--and I don't know if that is a reliable source. If additional sources are found, please contact me and I'll reconsider my vote. Papaursa (talk) 23:15, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.