Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dreyer Farms (2nd nomination)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was The result was procedural keep —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikidemon (talk • contribs) 05:13, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- Dreyer Farms (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Subject of purely local (small town) press coverage. No reliable sources. This article most likely will never be able to grow beyond its current state. Gattosby (talk) 02:10, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete doesn't get any coverage in gnews besides in nj.com [1]. LibStar (talk) 02:16, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - considering the nominator nominated every article this editor made prior to being blocked as a malicious sockpuppet, it should be given opportunity to be developed. Wildhartlivie (talk) 05:00, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Proc Keep WP:ILLEGIT Editing project space: Undisclosed alternative accounts should not edit policies, guidelines, or their talk pages; comment in Arbitration proceedings; or vote in requests for adminship, deletion debates, or elections. {Otherwise I'd say delete for not meeting WP:CORP}--Savonneux (talk) 05:06, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.