Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fernox (2nd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Barkeep49 (talk) 02:24, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
AfDs for this article:
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Fernox (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Blatant advertising. All major contributors are banned for advertising. Sam at Megaputer (talk) 04:23, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 04:31, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 04:31, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
Reluctant Delete: article passes WP:CORP, but due its contributions almost entirely by banned users, may qualify for deletion. If a definite answer is needed, than delete. But I would say get a larger amount of consensus. VERSACESPACE 06:06, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete - paid-for spam; irrespective of whether this company is notable WP:TNT applies. MER-C 12:47, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete - Wikipedia is not for promotion and this article is irredeemably promotional. Blow it up and start again. --Jack Frost (talk) 02:29, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.