Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/George Mirabal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to City of Bell scandal. ✗plicit 12:30, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

George Mirabal

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

George Mirabal (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unnotable mayor holding unnotable positions in a small city. Does not appear to pass WP:NPOL or WP:GNG. He does have some media coverage related to his role in the City of Bell scandal, though his individual role does not seem to pass WP:NCRIME. Could be merged or redirected to City of Bell scandal as an WP:ATD. Previously nominated in the 48-article bundle at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fidel Vargas, closed as procedural keep due to the bundle's size. AllTheUsernamesAreInUse (talk) 05:19, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians, Crime, and California. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 11:46, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

• Redirect to City of Bell scandal, a much more detailed account of what happened. Mirabal is only notable for being one of many people involved in that scandal. — Maile (talk) 14:38, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
• Redirect per previous vote. BottleOfChocolateMilk (talk) 20:03, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

• Redirect to City of Bell scandal, most of the secondary sources I could find are WP:ROTM for any local politician and not enough to establish WP:NOTABILITY or significant coverage per WP:POLITICIAN and the involvement in the scandal isn't enough to pass WP:CRIME enough to merit his own article, so a redirect sounds good to me. Shaws username . talk . 04:55, 16 February 2024 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.