Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GlobalPlatform
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Erik9 (talk) 01:06, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- GlobalPlatform (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
the article does not establish notability nor do any of the links at "GlobalPlatform". also, there are WP:COI issues as the creator of the article appears to be a representative of this organization. but then again, maybe consensus will decide notability standards don't apply in this case. guess we'll see. Misterdiscreet (talk) 21:23, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Obviously passes WP:CLUB, as 1) it is international in scope, and 2) it is covered to some (limited) extent in at least two books by respected academic publishers and is in the focus of numerous peer-reviewed publications. (Example: [1].) See also this Google News archive search.
- The article has a severe problem with marketing speak. I did some editing, but more is needed. --Hans Adler (talk) 15:21, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:05, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep minor level of notability established. JJL (talk) 00:07, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep International in scope and notable. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Muon neutrino (talk • contribs) 08:30, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- why would anyone risk being banned by engaging in sock puppetry with one-shot accounts, like yours, when their victory was already assured? Misterdiscreet (talk) 14:41, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.