Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hatem Zeine

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 07:28, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

Hatem Zeine

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Hatem Zeine (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nomination on behalf of by 24.7.88.209 (talk · contribs · WHOIS): Article and sources do not appear to fulfill the criteria of WP:NOTE - it doesn't help that it was written by a contributor with a clear WP:COI. Searching for "Hatem Zeine" on google etc doesn't give any results that would help with WP:NOTE. (permalink) – Joe (talk) 06:49, 29 January 2024 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Jordan. – Joe (talk) 06:49, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:12, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Technology, England, and United States of America. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 12:00, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
• Delete: Lots of articles written by this person as a Forbes Council member, none of which makes them notable. Nothing found otherwise. Oaktree b (talk) 13:19, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
• Delete, the IP is quite right; I'm finding a lot of social media, business-churnalism and the TechCrunch article which is uncomfortably close to interview, but nothing that convinces me of independent recognition unprompted by the subject. It might be too soon? Not notable in Wikipedia's sense at the moment. Elemimele (talk) 13:32, 29 January 2024 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.