Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Imam Ghali

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. CSD:G3. Let's not waste effort on known hoaxers SpinningSpark 16:25, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

Imam Ghali

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Imam Ghali (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of existence or notability, fails WP:V. Same issues as Ahmed Abdullahi Aliyu Abdurrahim Sumaila. Appears to be part of a series of hoaxes created by sockpuppets. Cited sources are either books that do not exist or ones that do not mention "Imam Ghali Kadawa" at all. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:19, 5 November 2022 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History, Royalty and nobility, Islam, and Nigeria. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:20, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
• Delete: I didn't find anything helpful. This fails WP:GNG. Verifiability? ─ The Aafī (talk) 13:24, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
• Delete no RIS found, likely a hoax. Mccapra (talk) 17:26, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
• Delete per nominator's rationale. BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 12:02, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.