Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lei von Habsburg-Lothringen
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Archduke Géza of Austria#Marriage and children per the below discussion. TheSandDoctor Talk 05:22, 20 June 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Lei von Habsburg-Lothringen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Deprodded with the rationale, "One of two black women to marry into the House of Habsburg-Lorraine." However, notability is not inherited. Onel5969 TT me 03:08, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Thanks,L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 03:44, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Thanks,L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 03:44, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. Thanks,L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 03:44, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Austria-related deletion discussions. Thanks,L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 03:44, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Thanks,L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 03:44, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Carolina-related deletion discussions. Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 03:55, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
- Redirect to Archduke_Géza_of_Austria#Marriage_and_children where she gets a mention in her father-in-law's article (and add the sources to that article, and delink her there). PamD 08:31, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
- Redirect per PamD. The subject's claim to notability is based on her marriage into a royal (albeit no longer reigning) house. Yet her husband is not himself notable enough to have a Wikipedia article, or at least he doesn't currently have one. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 03:24, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
- Redirect (or merge briefly). She just appears to be a NN lawyer, which the unusual distinction of having married into the family of an imperial pretender. Peterkingiron (talk) 15:43, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.