Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martine Lachance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. j⚛e deckertalk 04:22, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
- Martine Lachance (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not appear to meet WP:PROF. I can't find any secondary sources remarking on her contribution to the field. All the sources on the page are by the subject or the institute she runs (except for the university's bio of her). Wieno (talk) 06:46, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
- See also related AFD at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Research Group on Animal Law. Wieno (talk) 22:08, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:39, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:40, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:40, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. No pass of WP:Prof. Xxanthippe (talk) 21:54, 5 February 2014 (UTC).
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Northamerica1000(talk) 09:31, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. The claims of notability seem to be the unsourced assertion that she's one of the few experts on animal rights in Canada (dubious) and that she organized a conference (routine academic work) – ipso facto not notable. Agricola44 (talk) 16:19, 14 February 2014 (UTC).
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.