Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mery Racauchi (Singer)
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Numbers of followers is not a notability standard and no real argument that this isn't TOOSOON recreation when things change is encouraged. Spartaz Humbug! 19:33, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Mery Racauchi (Singer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:SINGER. Andrew Base (talk) 15:27, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Andrew Base (talk) 15:27, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 15:58, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Argentina-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 15:58, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
- Keep I think she has only recently started a career with an EP, like yesterday it feels like, so it fails there. But, she does have more than 370K followers on Facebook, which makes her notable. There is some coverage, sufficient for a seed article per WP:THREE. scope_creepTalk 16:06, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Hi Scope creep, I think the article should be deleted for now and it may be recreated when the subject becomes more notable and when it meets WP:SINGER. Andrew Base (talk) 12:11, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
- Hi @Andrew Base: I did come into the Afd thinking it was a waste of my breath looking at the article and was planning going forward with a delete, but 370k follower isn't insignificant and well past the guidelines. I'd wait until the Afd is complete. Its early days. scope_creepTalk 12:22, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 03:13, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 03:13, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
- Delete perhaps WP:TOOSOON. Lightburst (talk) 04:41, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.