Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nana Afua Antwi
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. The consensus is that there is no evidence that this person meets the notability criteria. PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 15:34, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
- Nana Afua Antwi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log ·
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
this article does not meet Wikipedia notability guidelines ,,,, there is NO evidence of Notability on this Article , Secondly the references on this article like the BBC NEWS link has no Content about the person on topic , the orthers references i found are not reliable Samat lib (talk) 19:54, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 June 6. —cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:18, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:06, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:06, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
- Hmmm. There is this, but the article was written by the subject's friend and in itself it is a bit slight. But the source seems to be editorially sound, a Ghanaian web newspaper/online magazine under editorial contrrol. There is quite a flurry of coverage about her being signed as a face for Revlon. But at the end of the day, and this really gives me no pleasure at all, I have to say that after a search for sources, I don't see a convincing case for notability at this point, so delete. :( Mabalu (talk) 13:45, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as I have found only a few links, nothing at all actually convincing and there's nothing else better here also. SwisterTwister talk 22:46, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Fails WP:ENT and WP:GNG. My searches found very little reliable coverage out there; not enough for a solid, independent article. Omni Flames (talk) 06:53, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. I'm not seeing the notability here. The mentions of various appearances on magazine covers do not come close to meeting the requirement of significant coverage. NewYorkActuary (talk) 07:35, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ghana-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 08:59, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.