Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nancy Shevell
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Paul McCartney#relationship with Nancy Shevell. History retained as there are some useful WP:RS sources there. Cirt (talk) 04:31, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Nancy Shevell (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
This is a classic WP:ONEVENT subject. None of the third-party references (excluding the bio at the subject's own company's web site) refers to the subject in a context other than in relation to Paul McCartney. All of the material information and references from this article have been merged into a brief couple of paragraphs in the main article, Paul McCartney.
Suggested course of action is to replace the article with a redirect to Paul McCartney#relationship with Nancy Shevell. Bongomatic (talk) 07:14, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect for now, but WP:ONEVENT is not a universal rule. It depends on how big the "one event" is, and if things get more serious with McCartney that's big enough for an article. Ward3001 (talk) 15:20, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:03, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, kurykh 07:30, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.