Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Newshouse
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. MBisanz talk 23:53, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Newshouse (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Not notable. Kittybrewster ☎ 17:42, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep. Stub article; there appears to be one RS to somewhat establish notability. KuyaBriBriTalk 17:55, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep per Navneet Group's market cap. This seems to be one of their main publications, and it is a demonstrably (top 300?) notable company. Ottre 18:19, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
- Weal keep Indian Express story is substantial coverage. ChildofMidnight (talk) 22:04, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 00:02, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: only 20,000 issues in a city of 14 million. Non-notable. JamesBurns (talk) 01:36, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.