Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Operation 7 (video game)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:07, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Operation 7 (video game) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Deprodded without comment by page's author. Only one review which may or may not be reputable; no other sources found. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 19:28, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- For what it's worth, author left this edit summary when removing the PROD template: "If I have 2 reliable references and a reference to the game itself, some articles have a lot less then that!" —Wrathchild (talk) 19:50, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. There are thousands upon thousands of independently produced, non-notable video games out there. This happens to be one of them. —Wrathchild (talk) 19:50, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete as web content without assertion of notability/importance. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 20:28, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. This is a non-notable game, and I can't find any reliable sources. (This article was also created by a newbie, FWIW.) Thekillerpenguin (talk) 00:17, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete - "semi-high quality game" does not even make sense. Skullbird11 (talk) 13:00, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 01:36, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:36, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Delete - While expressions like "semi-high quality game" certainly make me raise en eyebrow, the game's notability is not unarguably non-existent. It's been reviewed by MMOHut, MMOBomb, MMOReviews; the reliability of the sites is questionable, however. Salvidrim! 19:44, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Salvidrim and I typically go through similar efforts for source hunting, so if that's the best he's got, I don't think it's got the necessary coverage... Sergecross73 msg me 14:26, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.