Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Picopop
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to 8-bit (music). –Juliancolton | Talk 02:42, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Picopop (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Another neologism. No real description of style or development. An unreferenced stub for 5 years. Ridernyc (talk) 11:01, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:37, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge and redirect to 8-bit (music) (which already lists several of the same bands). Verifying its existence, and therefore the legitimacy of the search term, is easy enough. Notability is a different story. The best reference I could find, via an admittedly cursory search, is this. I'd recommend a redirect to bitpop, but that was recently deleted by prod. (Tangentially, a merger of 8-bit (music) and the much more extensive and better sourced chiptune may be in order) — Gwalla | Talk 18:47, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.