Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quadrapop
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Tone 17:36, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Quadrapop (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
contested prod, unremarkable game. Usage claims in the article are not backed up by references, does not meet general notability guidelines. A Google News search is not showing significant coverage, only passing mentions. RadioFan (talk) 12:54, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MrKIA11 (talk) 13:16, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this application. Joe Chill (talk) 01:27, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Do not Delete: there are sources for this information in the article and this article is set as stub so letąs wait if someone will add more info to it —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.88.249.199 (talk) 23:54, 27 November 2009 (UTC) — 78.88.249.199 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
- Delete - Fails both WP:N and WP:RS. Couldn't enough sources to back this one up. I have no issue with the two sources listed in the article, but that's all I could find that's actually worth anything. --Teancum (talk) 12:45, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.