Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ryan Sasson
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. – Juliancolton | Talk 18:29, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
- Ryan Sasson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Subject of the article fails WP:GNG. I can't find the significant coverages in multiple independent reliable sources to establish the subject notability. Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 16:51, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 16:57, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Human3015TALK 17:06, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 11:34, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 11:34, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
- Delete per nominator. The subject's only claim to notability appears to be a minor role in a relatively unremarkable film. I've been unable to find any independent coverage of the subject. --Non-Dropframe talk 12:02, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:11, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - Nothing better at all. SwisterTwister talk 20:53, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - Pure puff piece on someone who doesn't meet notability criteria. Searches did not turn up anything. Onel5969 TT me 15:13, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.