Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Standard Chem＆Pharm

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ‑Scottywong| [confer] || 16:25, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

Standard Chem＆Pharm

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Standard Chem＆Pharm (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not pass WP:NCORP. 1292simon (talk) 07:57, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:21, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:21, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:21, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Taiwan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:22, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

• Article is very weak but the company is listed on the Taiwan Stock Exchange. It would be surprising if it were not notable. Rathfelder (talk) 22:55, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 12:17, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

• Comment. There appear to be some sources in zh:生達化學製藥. Like Rathfelder, I'd be quite surprised if a listed company like this weren't notable, but I can't evaluate the sources. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 15:18, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
• Delete Of the reference I can read, none meet the criteria for establishing notability. I'm happy to reconsider if someone can point to good references. References I can read fail WP:CORPDEPTH and/or WP:ORGIND. HighKing⁺⁺ 18:07, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
  • The test is not whether the sources are in English. Rathfelder (talk) 07:29, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
    • Don't assume I only read English...or that I can't use online translation tools. Perhaps I should have said "find" rather than read. Usually for a listed company, I look for analyst reports or coverage because those references meet the criteria. But I cannot find reports on this company but perhaps somebody else can? If so, I'll take a look and if they're good I'll change my !vote. HighKing⁺⁺ 11:12, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
• Delete unless some actual substantial independent coverage, in any language, can be found. By my best attempts to pick through the Chinese sources in zh:生達化學製藥, most of those sources are government websites confirming standards, a stock exchange listing, and several of them are just confirming the qualifications/awards won by the founder. None of them appear to be an actual piece about the company as a whole that would demonstrate notability under en-wiki's guidelines. I agree that this company kinda sounds like it should be notable, but I'm not seeing the sources to back it up. ~ mazca ^talk 12:52, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.