Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Studio Hari

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Missvain (talk) 04:33, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Studio Hari

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not pass WP:NCORP- coverage is passing mentions in two lists of films nominated for awards. MrsSnoozyTurtle (talk) 06:39, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 07:57, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 07:57, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 07:57, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 07:57, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note to closer for soft deletion: While this discussion appears to have no quorum, it is NOT eligible for soft deletion because it has been previously PROD'd (via summary). --Cewbot (talk) 00:02, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Logs: 2020-10 ✍️ create

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 00:44, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Looking at this version of the article, which was heavily edited by a sock IP of a blocked, disruptive editor, there are a number of other sources. Most of them appear to be passing mentions, some are 404s, some are duplicates of some of the others, I think. Some other source found include TBIVision.com and C21media.net. The second one is definitely a press release site, but I'm not sure about TBI or if it is a reliable source in this context. Another source here. From what I can tell, Kidscreen is a trade magazine as well as a company that hosts a summit each year to bring together companies and people producing content in the children's animation space. So they appear to be central to a lot of the wheeling/dealing. I don't see that they've been discussed at WP:RSN before, but this is potentially a reliable source that is talking about Studio Hari's workings in some detail. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 01:50, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I am unable to locate any significant coverage with in-depth information on the company and containing independent content, references to date fail the criteria for establishing notability, topic therefore fails GNG/WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 12:52, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 03:31, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete — What HighKing said. I agree with their rationale. Celestina007 (talk) 08:43, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Simply does not meet either WP:GNG or WP:CORPDEPTH. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 02:56, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Studio Hari

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.