Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Teddy Wakim
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete . Negativish, mostly-unsourced BLP, with questionable assertion of notability and no actual proof that the article creator is the subject. Failing that, it's either A7 or G10.--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 14:18, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Teddy Wakim (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Articles subject lacks a great deal of notability and therefore should be deleted. Also, the creator seems to be the subject of the article.Phoon (talk) 03:34, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Jenks24 (talk) 15:24, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:08, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:08, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete A7, BLP with no notability presented. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 18:40, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Notability not established. Additionally, this article presents crystal ball content. In my opinion, this article may be a hoax. The only website that uses the identical phrase of the title of the book announced for release September 2010, is a pornographic website. Cindamuse (talk) 18:44, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:TOOSOON. The only thing that is sourcable is his having issued a magazine called The Grandstand.[1] One reliable source does not a proper BLP make. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 04:41, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.