Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Hobson (actor)
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep #1: I am withdrawing my nomination, and nobody else has a recommendation to delete. —C.Fred (talk) 13:10, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Thomas Hobson (actor) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Actor with minor parts only and no cited sources to back them up. Fails notability and verifiability requirements. —C.Fred (talk) 15:50, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:06, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Award-nominated actor. I'll work on it now, C.Fred. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 03:10, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Follow-up Okay... I sourced the award nomination and expanded and cleaned up the article, turning this into THIS. His early television career as a child actor was steady but not too glamorous... but after graduating from Yale University in 2004 he got into theater and began getting more serious attention. His more recent work in The Fresh Beat Band has finally gotten him attention for his television work. But as he did keep active and receive notice for his stagework after 2004, it might seem that his combined theatrical and television career pushes at WP:ENT, though he's weak on WP:GNG. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 07:02, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- His work on The Fresh Beat Band is now painted in enough context to show that how he is significant. I now feel that the best course of action is to improve the article, not delete. As nobody else has !voted to delete the article, I am withdrawing the nomination and closing the discussion. —C.Fred (talk) 13:10, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.