Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tim Pierce (3rd nomination)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete without prejudice. Unsourced BLP. Will userfy/incubate upon request. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:21, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- Tim Pierce (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I can't seem to find enough sources to satisfy the general notability guidelines which are required for inclusion as a stand-alone aritcle. ErikHaugen (talk | contribs) 17:28, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note that the previous AfDs were for a different Tim Pierce. ErikHaugen (talk | contribs) 17:29, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 18:47, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — -- Cirt (talk) 20:10, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:37, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:51, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep He's got a lot of credits. At the very least, he's in a ton of liner notes, so you can establish notability as a session guitarist. When it comes to making a proper biographical article, that would be trickier. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 21:27, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.