Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Victoire of France (1556)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to Catherine de' Medici#Issue. Liz Read! Talk! 22:26, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Victoire of France (1556) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No idea why we would have a separate article for a child who died less than 2 months old. Should be a redirect to either of the parents. Fram (talk) 07:25, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Women, Royalty and nobility, and France. Fram (talk) 07:25, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Athel cb (talk) 09:05, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete could be a small subsection in the article about the king. Oaktree b (talk) 12:12, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
- Yes, exactly. Athel cb (talk) 16:37, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Wikipedia is not a royal biographical dictionary. We do not have articles just to fill in complete family trees. I suspect we have a lot more similar articles that need to go.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:17, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
- Agreed. Athel cb (talk) 16:37, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Agricolae (talk) 14:39, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
- Merge and redirect to Catherine_de'_Medici#Issue, because the information about her birth seems worth including there. PamD 07:45, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
- Agreed Unlimitedlead (talk) 12:07, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
- Merge and redirect to Catherine_de'_Medici#Issue, per PamD. 𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 (talk) 11:08, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
- REdirect or merge as suggested by the last two contributors. An infant who lived less than two months is inevitably NN. Peterkingiron (talk)
- Delete Non-notable article about 2 months born child--Onetimememorial (talk) 18:13, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
- Merge content but please do NOT redirect – only retarget inbound links to Catherine_de'_Medici#Issue. In other words, "Victoire of France (1556)" should not even exist as a Redirect. But yes, the content itself should be added to Catherine d'Medici's bio. (If the painting was notable in its own right, maybe it could have been an article about the painting, but that doesn't appear to be the focus here.) Cielquiparle (talk) 09:21, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
- No, there must be a link from Victoire of France - though perhaps move Victoire of France (1733–1799) to the base name as Primarty Topic and then make a hatnote there to point to Catherine_de'_Medici#Issue. Otherwise someone will re-create this and we'll go round in circles. PamD 18:13, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
This AfD discussion has been proposed for merger to Catherine de' Medici, and a notice of the proposed merger was posted to that page on June 22. As such, this AfD discussion may need to be extended or relisted to incorporate input from that page.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.