Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/White-whiskered Spinetail
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. Eagles 24/7 (C) 19:32, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- White-whiskered Spinetail (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Very little content with only 1 reference. Does not seem that notable. WOLfan112 (talk) 18:41, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Common outcomes which says that in past AFDs "All species that have a correct name (botany) or valid name (zoology) are inherently notable. Their names and at least a brief description must have been published in a reliable academic publication to be recognized as correct or valid." If the one reference is a reliable source, the case for keeping the article is made. Edison (talk) 18:46, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.