Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yazdani Bakery
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. The Bushranger One ping only 04:08, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
- Yazdani Bakery (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I do not see how the one very minor makes the bakery notable . DGG ( talk ) 01:06, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
- Delete hands down fails WP:GNG.--Jeffrd10 (talk) 16:08, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
- Question: One very minor what? §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 18:15, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
- Keep: The bakery has been subject of multiple web articles in online English newspapers. A story was also made by BBC TV. It constantly seems to be appearing amongst the top bakeries/tea stalls/eateries of Mumbai. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11]. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 18:34, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
- Keep - Meets WP:CORPDEPTH per this CNN article and this The Hindu article. Also keep per WP:NRVE: topic notability is based upon the availability of sources, rather than the state of sourcing within Wikipedia articles. Northamerica1000(talk) 04:34, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 04:41, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 04:41, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
- Keep Plenty of good sources have been identified above. Bravo. Andrew (talk) 18:26, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:47, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.