The texts are backed with notable resources and citations. The content is not promotional and states merely facts. I doubt people are casually deleting pages and it definitely hurts the environment. Please bring the article back, thanks. Crazyharlem (talk) 03:45, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Endorse if you genuinely don't think that was promotional then I suspect you may be too close to the subject to see the article objectively. I might as well have been reading the company website. Hut 8.507:28, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Endorse having not seen the deleted draft, but having seen that multiple editors said that it was promotional, and having not seen a reply to the question about conflict of interest, and noting, as is noted elsewhere in DRV, that promotional material is deleted regardless of notability. Robert McClenon (talk) 20:11, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Endorse. The content was entirely promotional, e.g.: "Centered on the lifestyle of next generation esports enthusiasts, VSPN is on a mission to balance the dynamic of esports eco-system for brands, cities and the esports industry." The WP:G11 deletion was correct. Sandstein 08:29, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it.
