Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/May-2023

Please cut and paste new entries to the bottom of this page, creating a new monthly archive (by closing date) when necessary.


	Older Archive
	Miscellaneous Archive
2004:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2005:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2006:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2007:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2008:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2009:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2010:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2011:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2012:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2013:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2014:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2015:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2016:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2017:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2018:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2019:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2020:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2021:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2022:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2023:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2024:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2025:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
Purge page cache if nominations haven't updated.

Palácio Rio Negro

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 2 May 2023 at 01:19:45 (UTC)

Reason: High quality image. High EV. This image is considered a Quality image on Wikimedia Commons.
Articles in which this image appears: Palácio Rio Negro, Petrópolis, President of Brazil
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
Creator: Wilfredor

Support as nominator – Vinícius O. (talk) 01:19, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Palace could be better maintained (I'm seeing quite a bit of water damage to the paint), but this is an excellent view of the building as it appeared at the time. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 22:21, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I totally agree - Vinícius O. (talk) 14:52, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Aye. Support Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.3% of all FPs. Currently celebrating his 600^th FP!} 20:41, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Choliamb (talk) 11:23, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Bammesk (talk) 12:50, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - MA Javadi (talk) 12:43, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:President's Summer home, Rio Negro Palace, Petrópolis, Rio de Janeiro.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 09:19, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Cultura contra Censura protest

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 2 May 2023 at 09:58:36 (UTC)

Reason: While a little snapshotty, given the government really didn't want this getting documented, it's as good as we're going to get. I think it's a decent documentary photo, even if its composition could be better.
Articles in which this image appears: Censorship under the military dictatorship in Brazil, Military dictatorship in Brazil
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/History/Others
Creator: Unknown photographer, restored by Adam Cuerden

Support as nominator – Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.3% of all FPs. Currently celebrating his 600^th FP!} 09:58, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 14:11, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Per file description, documentation came from the Correio da Manhã. Not quite sure if this meant that the creator was a photojournalist for the newspaper, but might be worth noting. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:59, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support - DreamSparrow ^Chat 18:28, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Choliamb (talk) 11:24, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – but right now it fails FP criterion #7, the file page lacks a "file description in English". Bammesk (talk) 12:45, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:56, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support. MER-C 13:50, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:19, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support UnpetitproleX (talk) 23:36, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Artistas protestam contra a Ditadura Militar - Tônia Carreiro, Eva Wilma, Odete Lara, Norma Bengell e Cacilda Becker - Restoration.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 10:41, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nigeen Lake panorama

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 2 May 2023 at 11:01:17 (UTC)

**Original** – A panoramic view of the Nigeen lake in Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India

Reason: A beautiful wide panorama of the Nigeen Lake, almost feels like you're there. This edited version was featured on commons unopposed.
Articles in which this image appears: Nigeen Lake
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Panorama
Creator: KennyOMG (edited by UnpetitproleX)

Support as nominator – UnpetitproleX (talk) 11:01, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Slightly under the minimum on the vertical resolution, but an excellent view of the lake and its geographic/social context. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 22:18, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Bammesk (talk) 13:03, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 13:51, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Choliamb (talk) 13:54, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – MA Javadi (talk) 12:40, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Nigeen Lake pano (edited).jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 21:31, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Benjamin Britten

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 2 May 2023 at 18:41:46 (UTC)

Reason: Widely-used and good photo of Britten essential to his article.
Articles in which this image appears: Benjamin Britten, Peter Grimes, Paul Bunyan (operetta), Imogen Holst, English art song
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Entertainment
Creator: Hans Wild, original uploaded by Ruhrfisch, restored by MyCatIsAChonk

Support as nominator – MyCatIsAChonk (talk) (not me) (also not me) (still no) 18:41, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Below minimum resolution. Excellent image, of course, but... — Chris Woodrich (talk) 22:16, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- @Crisco 1492: Ah, I see. Would simply increasing the size of the image be acceptable? Otherwise, how could I fix this? MyCatIsAChonk (talk) (not me) (also not me) (still no) 13:30, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  - No, because we would end up with less detail and sharpness. The best way to do this would be to find another copy of the image and scan it physically. Unfortunately, the only one on ebay right now has been marked for cropping and would not scan properly. (As an aside... I thought I recognized this image - I uploaded the original crop years ago). — Chris Woodrich (talk) 13:49, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    @Crisco 1492, I see then, thanks for clarifying that for me. Is there any chance it could pass, or would it be best to suspend this nom? MyCatIsAChonk (talk) (not me) (also not me) (still no) 13:54, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    - I don't see any resolution issue getting resolved within a reasonable time frame. I will keep an eye on eBay, though... they have some great images. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 14:28, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 21:39, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tamarind

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 3 May 2023 at 16:10:16 (UTC)

Reason: Currently unopposed on Commons FPC. Illustrates article well.
Articles in which this image appears: Tamarind
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Plants/Fruits
Creator: Ivar Leidus

Support as nominator – MER-C 16:10, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom — Chris Woodrich (talk) 21:25, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.3% of all FPs. Currently celebrating his 600^th FP!} 05:16, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:18, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Bammesk (talk) 02:06, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Choliamb (talk) 11:31, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Tamarind fruits (Tamarindus indica 'Si Thong').jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 20:33, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Rhacophorus kio mating

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 3 May 2023 at 16:23:53 (UTC)

**Original** – Mating black-webbed treefrogs (Rhacophorus kio). Kui Buri National Park, Thailand.

Reason: Unanimously featured on Commons three years ago. We already have a FP for this subject but this one illustrates a characteristic behavior.
Articles in which this image appears: Rhacophorus kio
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Amphibians
Creator: Rushenb

Support as nominator – MER-C 16:23, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This is probably better as FP than the other one. But do we need two? Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:18, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Charlesjsharp: Feel free to disagree - It's a matter of how you feel featured pictures should highlight subjects - but I'd say, given the other is the lead, and given this shows something different and specific, we can justify two. The alternative can lead to a situation where we don't get the extra work put in for any image other than the lead, and that's a situation I'd rather avoid. As such, I support. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.3% of all FPs. Currently celebrating his 600^th FP!} 10:48, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Vinícius O. (talk) 22:38, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support UnpetitproleX (talk) 18:55, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 20:34, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination didn’t reach the necessary quorum for promotion. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 20:34, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Black iguana

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 4 May 2023 at 21:15:17 (UTC)

Reason: High quality large image. FP on Commons.
Articles in which this image appears: Black iguana
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Reptiles
Creator: Charlesjsharp

Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:15, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 21:50, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Choliamb (talk) 11:32, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support This is probably the best of this little set of three, though lizards are much more still, which probably helps the focus. It's not that the birds are bad or anything; it's this one is especially good. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.3% of all FPs. Currently celebrating his 600^th FP!} 18:51, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 15:58, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Black iguana (Ctenosaura similis) Cayo.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 21:33, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Cinnamon hummingbird

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 4 May 2023 at 21:10:44 (UTC)

Reason: High quality image. FP on Commons.
Articles in which this image appears: Cinnamon hummingbird
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
Creator: Charlesjsharp

Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:10, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 21:49, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Indication of subspecies would be good; hopefully not too tricky given we know the location? Josh Milburn (talk) 11:01, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File description shows ssp is nominate which we don't always show Josh Milburn. Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:59, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support – Choliamb (talk) 11:32, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.3% of all FPs. Currently celebrating his 600^th FP!} 18:52, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support UnpetitproleX (talk) 10:42, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 16:00, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Cinnamon hummingbird (Amazilia rutila) in flight Los Tarrales.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 21:35, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Golden-fronted woodpecker

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 4 May 2023 at 21:07:44 (UTC)

Reason: High quality image. FP on Commons.
Articles in which this image appears: Golden-fronted woodpecker
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
Creator: Charlesjsharp

Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:07, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 21:50, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Choliamb (talk) 11:37, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment – Should this photo be added to the article on Velasquez's woodpecker as well? It shows more diagnostic features than the the current photo there (although I do like the fact that the bird is shown feeding in that one). Choliamb (talk) 11:54, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  - Done, thanks Choliamb; I didn't know the article existed! Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:02, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    - Charlesjsharp: As it happens, I saw my lifer Velasquez's woodpecker at Copan, within a few hundred yards of the spot where you photographed this one. From the coordinates of the photo, I assume you were staying at the Hacienda San Lucas, which is where my wife and I stayed as well. Choliamb (talk) 14:17, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
      - Indeed we were. I climbed inside the tiny children's play hut half way down the lawn and crouched in there waiting for the woodpecker to land on the stump. Very uncomfortable and the day visitors were pointing and laughing (and disturbing the birds). The things we have to do to get close! Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:39, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.3% of all FPs. Currently celebrating his 600^th FP!} 18:52, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Vinícius O. (talk) 01:02, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Golden-fronted (Velasquez's) woodpecker (Melanerpes aurifrons) male Copan.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 21:36, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Althea Gibson

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 6 May 2023 at 08:59:47 (UTC)

Reason: Rather nice, free photo of the tennis player who broke the colour barrier. Since this was a photograph by a newspaper photographer, not high art, and hence we can presume it would have been intended to be cropped, I took the liberty of cleaning up the left edge a little more than I usually would to crop out that weird fringe-y pillar and deal with the distracting shadow.
Articles in which this image appears: Althea Gibson and like 10 others (currently under a file redirect until Commons Delinker runs)
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Sport
Creator: Fred Palumbo (New York World-Telegram and The Sun); restored by Adam Cuerden

Support as nominator – Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.3% of all FPs. Currently celebrating his 600^th FP!} 08:59, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Bammesk (talk) 01:35, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – I believe the "fringe-y pillar" is actually a native Italian fusilli tree, a rare Campanian endemic restricted to moist north-facing slopes with rich volcanic soils. I seem to remember reading that Gibson was a big pasta fan and liked to bring a couple of potted trees on tour with her so that she could enjoy fresh-picked fusilli whenever she wanted, although I can't find a source for that right now. Choliamb (talk) 14:11, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
...Relative of the spaghetti tree, right? Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.3% of all FPs. Currently celebrating his 600^th FP!} 20:41, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - I prefer the version without the plant, and this is a nice, high-quality image. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:22, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support UnpetitproleX (talk) 10:52, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 16:03, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Althea Gibson in 1956 by Fred Palumbo (NYWTS).jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 09:32, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bhaga River Valley

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 8 May 2023 at 15:07:31 (UTC)

**Original** – Valley of the Bhaga river in Lahaul, Himachal Pradesh, India

Reason: Another beautiful Tagooty image; featured unopposed on commons, was POTD (image du jour) on french wiki
Articles in which this image appears: Lahaul and Spiti district
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Landscapes
Creator: Timothy Gonsalves

Support as nominator – UnpetitproleX (talk) 15:07, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:22, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.3% of all FPs. Currently celebrating his 600^th FP!} 00:44, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 16:04, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Bammesk (talk) 14:56, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Choliamb (talk) 22:07, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:56, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thanks for the nomination @UnpetitproleX --Tagooty (talk) 10:10, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Kardhang Biling Bhaga Dhauladhar Oct22 A7C 04645.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 16:06, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Jens Filbrich

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 8 May 2023 at 15:35:56 (UTC)

Reason: High quality image
Articles in which this image appears: Jens Filbrich, Cross necklace
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Sport
Creator: DerHexer

Support as nominator – Vinícius O. (talk) 15:35, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Uninteresting headshot with nothing to indicate why this person is notable. Nick-D (talk) 01:48, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose – Per Nick-D. Meh. – Sca (talk) 12:36, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 16:09, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Cougar MRAP in test explosion

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 8 May 2023 at 21:13:34 (UTC)

**Original** – An FPI Cougar (MRAP) in testing with a simulated mine explosion.

Reason: A stunning photo that does a good job of illustrating the subject for the article.
Articles in which this image appears: Cougar (MRAP), MRAP
FP category for this image: Vehicles
Creator: United States Department of Defense

Support as nominator – Cat-five t c ---- 21:13, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Impressive photo at thumbnail, but I'm not sure if the great composition and interesting event justifies what I presume is a terrible 2007 digital camera, though Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.3% of all FPs. Currently celebrating his 600^th FP!} 00:45, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Agreed, the amount of grain is unfortunate. Cat-five t c ---- 12:55, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Might be OK if it was not a test Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:47, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- If this weren't a test, I don't think they would have gotten a shot like this. Regardless, I don't think that it being a test takes away from its encyclopedic value in the articles it is used in. Cat-five t c ---- 12:55, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This type of shot can be seen in any action movie! Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:17, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 09:04, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sohrol Armenian Church

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 8 May 2023 at 22:52:38 (UTC)

**Original** – Saint John Church of Sohrol

Reason: Picture of the year 2021 on commons, featured on Persian and Arabic wiki; surprised it already isn't featured here, but now's as good a time as any
Articles in which this image appears: Saint John Church of Sohrol and others
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
Creator: Farzin Doust

Support as nominator – UnpetitproleX (talk) 22:52, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.3% of all FPs. Currently celebrating his 600^th FP!} 00:46, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 09:59, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Xcllnt comp. – Sca (talk) 12:34, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 16:05, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:18, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Choliamb (talk) 22:09, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:46, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support. —Bruce1ee ^talk 08:27, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Holy SURP Hovhannes Church.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 09:13, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bandits Roost, 59 1⁄2 Mulberry Street

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 9 May 2023 at 09:36:30 (UTC)

Reason: Kind of an iconic work of photojournalism.
Articles in which this image appears: Bandits' Roost, 59 1/2 Mulberry Street, How the Other Half Lives, Jacob Riis, and ten others (!!)
FP category for this image: I'd say Wikipedia:Featured pictures/History/USA History, Wikipedia:Featured_pictures/Places/Urban. Your call, Armbrust.
Creator: Jacob Riis, restored by Adam Cuerden

Support as nominator – Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.3% of all FPs. Currently celebrating his 600^th FP!} 09:36, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Excellent restoration and digitization of a notable photograph, which well-illustrates several schools of photography — Chris Woodrich (talk) 09:53, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 16:06, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support. High-quality scan of a photo that is both encyclopedic and independently notable. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:16, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Bammesk (talk) 14:45, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Choliamb (talk) 22:10, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Crisco 1492, MER-C, David Eppstein, Bammesk, and Choliamb: Just to note, I noticed there was a dark edge to the top of the image, so I spent a little time adjusting it. I don't think it's the archway I believe he was shooting through (the dark corners) as it doesn't follow the line of it, I think it was just standard guttering at the edges of an image. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.3% of all FPs. Currently celebrating his 600^th FP!} 21:29, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good to me. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 22:28, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Bandits Roost, 59 and a half Mulberry Street.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 09:45, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Takht-i-Bahi aerial

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 9 May 2023 at 10:50:50 (UTC)

**Original** – Aerial view of the ruins of the Takht-i-Bahi Buddhist monastery complex

Reason: A good quality drone shot of the ruined Takht-i-Bahi Buddhist monastery complex; also easy to annotate (will do so later)
Articles in which this image appears: Takht-i-Bahi
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
Creator: Muzammil Hussain Toori

Support as nominator – UnpetitproleX (talk) 10:50, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support I'm not an expert on drone shots, but this looks good to me. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.3% of all FPs. Currently celebrating his 600^th FP!} 10:57, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – This shows most (almost all) of the site (based on satellite imagery, and unlike the infobox image). Good encyclopedic depiction of the site. Bammesk (talk) 15:25, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Choliamb (talk) 22:11, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 16:11, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:45, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Takht-i-Bahi Buddhist Monastery.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 13:42, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

White-fronted honeyeater

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 10 May 2023 at 09:48:58 (UTC)

Reason: Currently unopposed at Commons FPC, illustrates article well.
Articles in which this image appears: White-fronted honeyeater
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
Creator: JJ Harrison

Support as nominator – MER-C 09:48, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support UnpetitproleX (talk) 17:22, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Choliamb (talk) 22:12, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:45, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 21:51, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:White-fronted honeyeater - Round Hill NSW.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 13:50, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Junonia orithya

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 10 May 2023 at 09:53:00 (UTC)

Reason: Featured on Commons, illustrates article well.
Articles in which this image appears: Junonia orithya, List of butterflies of Kerala
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Insects
Creator: Jeevan Jose

Support as nominator – MER-C 09:53, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support UnpetitproleX (talk) 17:18, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Choliamb (talk) 22:13, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:44, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 21:51, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Junonia orithya-Thekkady-2016-12-03-001.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 13:54, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Set:Dome interiors of Shah Jahan mosque

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 10 May 2023 at 23:50:35 (UTC)

Interior view of tile-decorated domes of the Shah Jahan Mosque in Thatta (Sindh, Pakistan)

Reason: Both, individually, are FPs on commons; and though they can be FPs individually here on wiki as well, I think they have a much greater EV as a set
Articles in which this image appears: Shah Jahan Mosque, Thatta
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors
Creator: Alexander Savin

Support as nominator – UnpetitproleX (talk) 23:50, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --A.Savin (talk) 15:03, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support individually, not sure as a set. I'm not confident that this set is complete. MER-C 18:42, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Just as clarification for whoever eventually closes this nom, is your vote 'neutral' for the set, or 'oppose/support'? UnpetitproleX (talk) 21:24, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral for now. MER-C 18:31, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - The two images complement each other well. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 21:48, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Bammesk (talk) 01:15, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Not sure what a set means in this case, though: They're not going on the main page on the same day most likely, so... Still, probably makes sense to link them together. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.3% of all FPs. Currently celebrating his 600^th FP!} 14:44, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — PerfectSoundWhatever (t; c) 16:23, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:PK Thatta asv2020-02 img08 Shah Jahan Mosque.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 02:46, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Promoted File:PK Thatta asv2020-02 img03 Shah Jahan Mosque.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 02:46, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fork-tailed flycatcher

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 12 May 2023 at 14:07:24 (UTC)

Reason: High quality image. FP on Commons. Not in infobox but demonstrates why the bird is so named.
Articles in which this image appears: Fork-tailed flycatcher
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
Creator: Charlesjsharp

Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:07, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 18:44, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Could be a bit higher resolution, but difficulty of shot justifies. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.3% of all FPs. Currently celebrating his 600^th FP!} 15:20, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, if the bird was any closer it would be almost impossible to track it - as I found... Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:58, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Good EV. —Bruce1ee ^talk 08:25, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Choliamb (talk) 18:12, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Fork-tailed flycatcher (Tyrannus savana monachus) in flight Cayo.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 15:48, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Roadside hawk with kill

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 12 May 2023 at 14:13:39 (UTC)

**Original** – Roadside hawk (*Rupornis magnirostris griseocauda*) eating a speckled racer snake (*Drymobius margaritiferus*) in Belize

Reason: High quality image. FP on Commons. Not in infobox but shows a kill
Articles in which this image appears: Roadside hawk, Accipitridae
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
Creator: Charlesjsharp

Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:13, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 18:43, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Looks like the lizard was still writhing. Lots of detail in this picture! — Chris Woodrich (talk) 21:50, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It was very much alive I'm afraid. For once, I like the blur. Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:42, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support Wow, amazing --Muhammad(talk) 13:56, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support great shot UnpetitproleX (talk) 21:25, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Choliamb (talk) 21:49, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – A Belizean bird. – Sca (talk) 12:19, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand your comment. The bird is not a Belize endemic. Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:20, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Roadside hawk (Rupornis magnirostris griseocauda) eating speckled racer (Drymobius margaritiferus) Orange Walk.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 15:50, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Common crab spider with prey

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 12 May 2023 at 14:47:34 (UTC)

**Original** – Common crab spider (*Xysticus cristatus*) female with prey Carniolan honey bee (*Apis melifera carnica*) in Slovenia.

Reason: High quality large image. Shows predatory behaviour. FP on Commons. FP on Slovenian Wikipedia
Articles in which this image appears: Xysticus cristatus
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Arachnids
Creator: Charlesjsharp

Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:47, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 18:42, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 21:50, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support UnpetitproleX (talk) 21:30, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Choliamb (talk) 21:50, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Common crab spider (Xysticus cristatus) female with prey Carniolan honey bee (Apis melifera carnica).jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 15:52, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Atacamite

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 14 May 2023 at 01:50:29 (UTC)

Reason: Quality image of this mineral.
Articles in which this image appears: Atacamite
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Sciences/Geology
Creator: Ivar Leidus

Support as nominator – Bammesk (talk) 01:50, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - I'm always partial to Leidus' minerals... --Janke | Talk 10:49, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 17:49, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.3% of all FPs. Currently celebrating his 600^th FP!} 15:21, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Vinícius O. (talk) 00:22, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Choliamb (talk) 18:14, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support The person who loves reading (talk) 23:04, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Atacamite on malachite - Mt Gunson mines, South Australia.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 18:47, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Agnes Booth

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 14 May 2023 at 06:07:01 (UTC)

Reason: While it will not hold up to pixel peeping - the original is about 4 inches (10.5 cm) wide, and I'd say it looks pretty good up to about 4x original size. You can get it up to 8x or so; it won't look great at that point.
Articles in which this image appears: Agnes Booth, Engaged (play)
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured_pictures/People/Entertainment
Creator: Abraham Bogardus, restored by Adam Cuerden

Support as nominator – Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.3% of all FPs. Currently celebrating his 600^th FP!} 06:07, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
There's something in the top right corner: like part of a letter. And is there a repair to the image you have restored - in her dress just above the corner of the chaise longue? By the way, have you thought of using Topaz Gigapixel to enlarge your restorations? I use it when I restore my old family photos. You can get a free trial. Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:27, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
As for the letter, I believe that's part of the mount that was covered by the large picture. As for the bit above the chaise lounge - fixing it now. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.3% of all FPs. Currently celebrating his 600^th FP!} 22:42, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:18, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Just realised I didn't answer: As for Topaz Gigapixel... trying to avoid AI on old images. I suspect they're trained on modern photography, and I don't want to introduce oddities. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.3% of all FPs. Currently celebrating his 600^th FP!} 15:25, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – I can't consistently open the last upload at full size though! Bammesk (talk) 02:22, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Bammesk: Should be fixed. Think I uploaded before it was fully saved. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.3% of all FPs. Currently celebrating his 600^th FP!} 02:38, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's fine now. Bammesk (talk) 03:28, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support. MER-C 14:51, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Choliamb (talk) 18:15, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support The person who loves reading (talk) 23:03, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Agnes Booth in W. S. Gilbert's Engaged 1879.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 18:52, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Petrópolis Cathedral interior

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 15 May 2023 at 14:02:20 (UTC)

**Original** – Cathedral of Petrópolis, Brazil

Reason: Good resolution. High EV. This image is considered a Quality image on Wikimedia Commons.
Articles in which this image appears: Cathedral of Petrópolis
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors
Creator: Wilfredor

Support as nominator – Vinícius O. (talk) 14:02, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment This image of the church interior has higher EV to me. --Tagooty (talk) 04:32, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 15:06, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Verrado High School

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 15 May 2023 at 20:51:39 (UTC)

**Original** – Photograph of a high school in Arizona

Reason: The angle is slightly off but the image adequately demonstrates the subject. There is very slight grain but virtually unnoticeable. Lighting has not been altered. Resolution and composition are fair. I can retake the picture from a different angle if necessary.
Articles in which this image appears: Verrado High School
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
Creator: SyntheticSystems

Support as nominator – SyntheticSystems (talk) 20:51, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose – Building image lacks visual interest, vertical perspective looks faulty, and target article seems to have been written primarily by nominator. – Sca (talk) 13:12, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think the article being written by nominator is a problem, but the image is cut off on the right and has too much foreground. Perspective is fairly fixable, so I'd say it's about 80% of the way to what may be our first high school FP: There's a lot of good in the image. I'd suggest playing with angle to get the full building in, and then you may need to collaborate on a perspective adjustment and crop. It's a great image, just not quite at the top level, but I think you can do it. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.3% of all FPs. Currently celebrating his 600^th FP!} 13:22, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose as such. Agree with Adam above. Architectural photography has many pitfalls - this illustrates a few of them, among others a too low camera position which causes much of the perspective distortion. This could be done a lot better, so why don't give it another try... --Janke | Talk 15:13, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
IMO, much blah foreground, too. -- Sca (talk) 12:16, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I did mention that. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.3% of all FPs. Currently celebrating his 600^th FP!} 10:06, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per above. — PerfectSoundWhatever (t; c) 16:27, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The person who loves reading (talk) 23:03, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 22:01, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

1974 Bundeswehr field ration contents

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 16 May 2023 at 01:05:36 (UTC)

**Original** – The assorted contents of an "Einmannpackung Typ 1" field ration issued to Bundeswehr personnel in the 1970s, displayed at the Museum for Hamburg History in Hamburg, Germany in 2012

Reason: This is my first one, so let me go over each criterion: high resolution, displays contents fairly clearly (even with the glare, most text can still be made out), in public domain, used in field ration to illustrate typical ration contents far better than other images (most of which just show them spread out on a table or something at an angle), has an English description (just added one), and doesn't seem manipulated to a significant degree if at all.
Articles in which this image appears: Field ration
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Food and drink
Creator: Medvedev

Support as nominator – AdoTang (talk) 01:05, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good, encyclopedic image. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.3% of all FPs. Currently celebrating his 600^th FP!} 15:02, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Very unique pic. GamerPro64 04:23, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Field rations for troops used in action/in combat zone would be more encyclopaedic. The container is mssing. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:44, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
See another image on the uploader's page, everything is in a cardboard box, nothing special... --Janke | Talk 17:50, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Bammesk (talk) 16:24, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Needs a fifth. --Janke | Talk 08:21, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support The person who loves reading (talk) 23:03, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Clear image with strong EV Nick-D (talk) 23:08, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Einmannpackung Typ1 Inhaltsübersicht.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 07:36, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Amanda Berry Smith

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 16 May 2023 at 13:03:32 (UTC)

**Original** – Methodist preacher Amanda Smith

Reason: It shows its age a bit, but is a pretty good image for the time.
Articles in which this image appears: Amanda Smith
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Religious figures
Creator: T. B. Latchmore, restored by Adam Cuerden

Support as nominator – Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.3% of all FPs. Currently celebrating his 600^th FP!} 13:03, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 15:16, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Question This is very sepia compared to other images. Is that normal? Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:41, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Charlesjsharp: For the era and this kind of print, I'd say it's in the normal range. Now, I have darkened it a bit from the faded original, and that did up the saturation slightly, which you could argue was fade correction, but could also argue for tweaking it back. To give a few examples of otfrom various museums, and using only originals, for comparison:

There's such a wide range that I don't think this is out of line. At the same time, there's such a wide range that tweaking the saturation down a bit (not to greyscale, but a little bit) wouldn't be out of line either. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.3% of all FPs. Currently celebrating his 600^th FP!} 13:30, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sure there is an 'expert' view as to what to do (and you're probably in that category!). I just downloaded it and clicked 'autotone' in Photoshop and I much prefer the result but as for authenticity? I have no idea. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:14, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Charlesjsharp: I don't have photoshop, but I'd say this is equally acceptable colours. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.3% of all FPs. Currently celebrating his 600^th FP!} 11:55, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support – Bammesk (talk) 15:45, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Since it's been mentioned, I'll add that I would probably prefer a slightly more desaturated version, but it's just a personal taste. Support either way. Choliamb (talk) 18:22, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@MER-C, Bammesk, Choliamb, and Charlesjsharp: Since people have stated a preference, and I think either is valid, I've switched to the slightly less saturated version. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.3% of all FPs. Currently celebrating his 600^th FP!} 10:41, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Noted, no preference between the two. MER-C 18:28, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Either version is fine. Bammesk (talk) 01:41, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirming my support. Choliamb (talk) 02:25, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support The person who loves reading (talk) 23:02, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Amanda Berry Smith by T. B. Latchmore.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 14:59, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Grandfey Viaduct

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 17 May 2023 at 08:04:18 (UTC)

Reason: High quality image of the Grandfey Viaduct with a train crossing it; good EV and a Commons FP.
Articles in which this image appears: Grandfey Viaduct
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Others
Creator: David Gubler

Support as nominator – —Bruce1ee ^talk 08:04, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Excellent image but only shows part of the viaduct. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:38, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – I know it's a done thing, but comp with reflected, inverted water-image seems a mite gimmicky in this case. – Sca (talk) 12:12, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 09:06, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Lime

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 17 May 2023 at 10:32:42 (UTC)

Reason: Currently unopposed on Commons FPC. Illustrates article well.
Articles in which this image appears: Lime (fruit)
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Plants/Fruits
Creator: Ivar Leidus

Support as nominator – MER-C 10:32, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Excellent photo but could be in infobox as second image. The first image shows the flower. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:40, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Bammesk (talk) 15:38, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Agree with Charles, but not that worried about it. That article has weird formatting, but this is FPC, not FAC. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.3% of all FPs. Currently celebrating his 600^th FP!} 10:53, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support The person who loves reading (talk) 23:02, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 11:59, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support (t · c) buidhe 22:33, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Lime - whole and halved.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 16:26, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Lamium purpureum

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 17 May 2023 at 11:21:11 (UTC)

Reason: Well executed focus stack. Illustrates article well.
Articles in which this image appears: Lamium purpureum
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Plants/Flowers
Creator: Ivar Leidus

Support as nominator – MER-C 11:21, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:40, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.3% of all FPs. Currently celebrating his 600^th FP!} 10:52, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support The person who loves reading (talk) 23:02, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 11:59, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Lamium purpureum - Tutermaa.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 16:28, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

John Oliver

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 17 May 2023 at 16:24:49 (UTC)

**Original** – Oliver at the 2016 Montclair Film Festival

Reason: Best image of Oliver we have with a high EV.
Articles in which this image appears: John Oliver, List of awards and nominations received by John Oliver, Last Week Tonight with John Oliver, John Oliver Memorial Sewer Plant, Net Neutrality II, Corporate haven
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Entertainment
Creator: Neil Grabowsky / Montclair Film Festival (via Flickr)

Support as nominator – MyCatIsAChonk (talk) (not me) (also not me) (still no) 16:24, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Bammesk (talk) 16:42, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The image on Flickr is a looser crop; Think we could redo this without the very, very tight crop? Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.3% of all FPs. Currently celebrating his 600^th FP!} 17:47, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, I support any looser crop. Bammesk (talk) 18:31, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Bammesk and Adam Cuerden: What're your thoughts on the second version of the image (revision here)? It's slightly looser. If that's still too close, what do you think is an acceptable spot for the bottom of the photo? MyCatIsAChonk (talk) (not me) (also not me) (still no) 23:58, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The earlier upload is better. I support any wider crop too. I don't have a hard preference. Bammesk (talk) 00:56, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Agree with Bammesk. That one's fine. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.3% of all FPs. Currently celebrating his 600^th FP!} 04:31, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Bammesk and Adam Cuerden: The image has been swapped. MyCatIsAChonk (talk) (not me) (also not me) (still no) 11:21, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.3% of all FPs. Currently celebrating his 600^th FP!} 19:13, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose The black bg poorly separates from the hair and the suit. — PerfectSoundWhatever (t; c) 16:28, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose a good image but I don't see what makes this FP worthy. (t · c) buidhe 22:32, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 16:29, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Charles Darwin by Julia Margaret Cameron

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 17 May 2023 at 18:33:03 (UTC)

Reason: A fairly iconic portrait of Charles Darwin. Great quality for 1868, and by a notable photographer
Articles in which this image appears: It's used in 25 articles, from Charles Darwin to Julia Margaret Cameron to History of speciation to List of University of Edinburgh medical people. The article on Darwin presents images in roughly date order, so this is a ways down, but it's the lead on numerous articles.
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Science and engineering
Creator: Julia Margaret Cameron

Support as nominator – Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.3% of all FPs. Currently celebrating his 600^th FP!} 18:33, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Janke | Talk 20:06, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – we have another FP of him (a frontal portait), but not a profile. Bammesk (talk) 20:37, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I was eyeing that. The other one is kind of a mediocre copy of File:Charles Darwin by Elliott & Fry, 1874.png - tempted to delist, but that can wait. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.3% of all FPs. Currently celebrating his 600^th FP!} 20:50, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Both images are deserving in his case. Bammesk (talk) 21:07, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support. MER-C 10:08, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Would support if the other is to be delisted. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:01, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Charlesjsharp: I mean, I can't promise a delist, but I'll nominate it when this closes for consideration. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.3% of all FPs. Currently celebrating his 600^th FP!} 09:36, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
thanks. Support. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:13, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Choliamb (talk) 02:28, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support The person who loves reading (talk) 23:01, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Charles Darwin by Julia Margaret Cameron, c. 1868.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 19:00, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Mercury switch

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 17 May 2023 at 19:04:01 (UTC)

Reason: Quality image of a mercury switch. Good depiction and complements the lead sentence of the article: "... an electrical switch that opens and closes a circuit when a small amount of the liquid metal mercury connects metal electrodes to close the circuit."
Articles in which this image appears: Mercury switch, Mercury (element)
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Engineering and technology/Electronics
Creator: Medvedev

Support as nominator – Bammesk (talk) 19:04, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Would be better without the background, size already mentioned in caption. There also are some droplets (not mercury) on/in the glass, looks like contamination. Here's a pristine example, as I'm used to see them: [[1]] --Janke | Talk 19:52, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I deduced the size from the background. I am pretty sure the contamination is from the de-plating (wicking) of the electrodes. It shows the switch has been used. Bammesk (talk) 20:57, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support — PerfectSoundWhatever (t; c) 16:25, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support It could be sharper, and is a bit grainy, but presuming that's normal for objects of this size, we're good. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.3% of all FPs. Currently celebrating his 600^th FP!} 23:55, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support The person who loves reading (talk) 23:01, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Janke. At fuller resolution the background isn't as distracting, but at thumbnail size it makes it hard to concentrate on the subject of this photograph. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:01, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Even worse, IMO, is that it is a damaged specimen - I didn't really state this clearly in my oppose above... --Janke | Talk 07:27, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It isn't a damaged specimen. It is used. Bammesk (talk) 12:51, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The ones that I have owned didn't look like this even after being used... --Janke | Talk 19:24, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok but that doesn't mean the nominated specimen is damaged. It is just used. Electricity, materials, operating conditions, etc .... lots of factors. Not all apples are red! so to speak! Bammesk (talk) 00:21, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support Saschaporsche (talk) 17:39, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Mercury Switch without housing.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 19:07, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ruins in Charleston, S.C.

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 19 May 2023 at 07:37:04 (UTC)

Reason: Quite a good photo. Colour seems quite intentional, so I haven't adjusted it.
Articles in which this image appears: Charleston in the American Civil War, George N. Barnard
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/History/American Civil War
Creator: George N. Barnard, restored by Adam Cuerden

Support as nominator – Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.3% of all FPs. Currently celebrating his 600^th FP!} 07:37, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
support Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:59, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Early capture of the horrors of war. – Sca (talk) 12:42, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 18:04, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – I like this one a lot. Choliamb (talk) 02:31, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment @Adam Cuerden: Adam, while looking at the article on George Barnard, I noticed that the lead image of Barnard himself could really use some attention from someone like you. It's a fine standing portrait by Mathew Brady, and high-resolution tiff is available from the Smithsonian, but the only versions currently in the Commons are two small and rather dismal crops. Any interest? Choliamb (talk) 03:03, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Probably wouldn't hurt. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.3% of all FPs. Currently celebrating his 600^th FP!} 05:49, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Choliamb: I have like... four images in the queue to nominate, and am kind of waiting on the Amanda Smith image to be passing or fail before I do, but I've made a start File:George N. Barnard by Mathew Brady.jpg, and will probably be done soon. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.3% of all FPs. Currently celebrating his 600^th FP!} 12:07, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Wow, that was fast. And a substantial improvement over the previous versions. Thanks. Choliamb (talk) 22:11, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support. AdoTang (talk) 16:38, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support The person who loves reading (talk) 23:01, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Ruins in Charleston, South Carolina by George N. Barnard - crop.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 10:05, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dark blue tiger butterfly

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 19 May 2023 at 09:06:07 (UTC)

**Original** – Dark blue tiger (*Tirumala septentrionis dravidarum*) male in Kerala, India

Reason: High quality large image. FP on Commons.
Articles in which this image appears: Dark blue tiger
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Insects
Creator: Charlesjsharp

Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:06, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 18:03, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Some fantastic detail. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.3% of all FPs. Currently celebrating his 600^th FP!} 10:48, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Choliamb (talk) 22:13, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support The person who loves reading (talk) 23:01, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Dark blue tiger (Tirumala septentrionis dravidarum) male underside.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 10:09, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Map butterfly

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 19 May 2023 at 09:08:14 (UTC)

Reason: High quality large image. FP on Commons.
Articles in which this image appears: Map (butterfly)
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Insects
Creator: Charlesjsharp

Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:08, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Objection on Commons about highlights noted but I don't think is disqualifying. MER-C 18:06, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per MER-C Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.3% of all FPs. Currently celebrating his 600^th FP!} 10:49, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Choliamb (talk) 22:14, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support The person who loves reading (talk) 23:01, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Map (Araschnia levana) form prorsa underside Piatra Craiului.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 10:11, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Clouded apollo

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 19 May 2023 at 09:10:25 (UTC)

Reason: High quality large image. FP on Commons.
Articles in which this image appears: Clouded apollo
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Insects
Creator: Charlesjsharp

Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:10, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 18:07, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.3% of all FPs. Currently celebrating his 600^th FP!} 10:49, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Choliamb (talk) 22:15, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support The person who loves reading (talk) 23:00, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Clouded apollo (Parnassius mnemosyne) Slivnica.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 10:13, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Mazafati

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 19 May 2023 at 18:20:03 (UTC)

Reason: Was seen on Commons FPC three months ago, where it was featured unanimously.
Articles in which this image appears: Mazafati, Date palm, List of date cultivars
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Plants/Fruits
Creator: Ivar Leidus

Support as nominator – MER-C 18:20, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Bammesk (talk) 01:44, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.3% of all FPs. Currently celebrating his 600^th FP!} 10:50, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Choliamb (talk) 22:18, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:47, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support The person who loves reading (talk) 23:00, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Saschaporsche (talk) 15:45, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Mazafati dates - whole, halved and seed.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 19:53, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

George N. Barnard

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 21 May 2023 at 19:32:27 (UTC)

Reason: It's a nice Mathew Brady portrait, and vastly improves on what was there. A little zoomed-out for modern eyes, perhaps, but I am not screwing with a Mathew Brady image - I believe the arrangements were meant to imitate classic portrait painting.
Articles in which this image appears: George N. Barnard
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Artists and writers
Creator: Mathew Brady, restored by Adam Cuerden

Support as nominator – Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.3% of all FPs. Currently celebrating his 600^th FP!} 19:32, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:49, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support The person who loves reading (talk) 23:00, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Choliamb (talk) 10:41, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support, and let's be frank - I do like full portraits. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:03, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 18:18, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:George N. Barnard by Mathew Brady.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 08:42, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ruby Hirose

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 23 May 2023 at 12:50:44 (UTC)

Reason: While a bit undersized, I don't think any detail is lost, and it is the best image we're likely to get of her. Only government-produced works have any chance of being out of copyright given whe she lived. Do wish it was less high-contrast.
Articles in which this image appears: Ruby Hirose, Toxoid
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Science and engineering
Creator: Science Service image, restored by Adam Cuerden

Support as nominator – Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.3% of all FPs. Currently celebrating his 600^th FP!} 12:50, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Totally blown highlights (even though not 255) spoils the image for me. --Janke | Talk 17:38, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I mean, I can't deny it, though it was, at least, in the original. It's a judgement as to whether the historic value overcomes that. I suspect this was taken for newspaper reproduction, in which case the high contrast might've been considered a benefit. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.3% of all FPs. Currently celebrating his 600^th FP!} 13:51, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Good EV. Exceptions to technical criteria apply to historic photos. Bammesk (talk) 13:22, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – It does seem that by 1940 a good fotog could have done a better job of avoiding exaggerated B/W contrast. – Sca (talk) 14:33, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
As I said, I suspect that it was being photographed for newspaper reproduction, which, if you've seen newspaper reproductions of the time, explains a bit. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.3% of all FPs. Currently celebrating his 600^th FP!} 14:38, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Er, 1940 is before my time -- but I know what you mean about newspaper letterpress repro from etched halftone plates. -- Sca (talk) 13:31, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I didn't think you'd have seen them at time of printing! Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.3% of all FPs. Currently celebrating his 600^th FP!} 13:43, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 12:54, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Poplar hawk-moth - Laothoe populi

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 23 May 2023 at 18:58:51 (UTC)

Reason: High quality large image. FP on Commons.
Articles in which this image appears: Poplar hawk-moth
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Insects
Creator: Charlesjsharp

Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:58, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support. The existing FPs of this subject still add value that this image does not: File:Joined moths.JPG, File:Poplar hawk-moth (Laothoe populi) late instar larva.jpg. MER-C 08:56, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Other than a tiny bit of one antenna that lifts out of the focal plane, this is incredibly sharp and detailed. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.4% of all FPs.} 16:45, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Choliamb (talk) 11:44, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 19:22, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination didn’t reach the necessary quorum for promotion. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 19:22, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hamerkop

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 23 May 2023 at 19:23:27 (UTC)

Reason: High quality image. FP on Commons.
Articles in which this image appears: Hamerkop, Scopus (bird)
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
Creator: Charlesjsharp

Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:23, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 08:53, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lovely feather detail, legs are very sharp. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.4% of all FPs.} 16:43, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent Image. Snehrashmi (talk) 03:58, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 19:24, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination didn’t reach the necessary quorum for promotion. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 19:24, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Small red damselfly

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 23 May 2023 at 19:37:25 (UTC)

Reason: High quality large image. FP on Commons.
Articles in which this image appears: Small red damselfly
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Insects
Creator: Charlesjsharp

Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:37, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Quite nice wing detail. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.4% of all FPs.} 16:42, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 09:00, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Choliamb (talk) 11:43, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 19:38, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination didn’t reach the necessary quorum for promotion. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 19:38, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Parshurama sculpture at Rani ki Vav

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 23 May 2023 at 19:39:49 (UTC)

Reason: FP at commons, a good quality image of some of the monument’s sculptures
Articles in which this image appears: Rani ki Vav
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Artwork/Sculpture
Creator: Snehrashmi

Support as nominator – UnpetitproleX (talk) 19:39, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Isn't central to the article. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:27, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – MA Javadi (talk) 06:29, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
~~support~~ - good quality image depicting Indian culture. -Meghdhanu (talk) 03:08, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Struck as user doesn’t has the required number of edits (100) to vote. Regards, Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 08:49, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support - Very good quality of image of Ancient sculpture from India. Could be used in number of categories/articles not just one, e.g. sculptures, Parashuram, Stepwells, etc -- Dhaval^Talk 07:16, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- : It could be but it isn't. FP is for images with some stability in English Wikipedia articles. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:11, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - as the highest contributor to Rani ki vav article. This 11th-century stepwell has more than 500 principal sculptures and the nominated image shows one excellent piece of it. It also invites readers to look into more sculptures in this monument. This World Heritage Site is one of the finest example of subterranean architecture of India. Regards, -Nizil (talk) 16:04, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support I wouldn't say this is perfectly sharp, but it's close. A quick fix to the gallery to new-style galleries mitigates - I wouldn't say overturns, but mitigates - Charles' objection. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.4% of all FPs.} 16:48, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
What new-style galleries are you talking about? I did not understand it. Regards, Nizil (talk) 14:49, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I'll explain on your talk page. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.4% of all FPs.} 19:52, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Rani ki vav - Patan - Gujarat - Wall Decorations.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 21:31, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Night view of Safdar Jung’s Tomb

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 23 May 2023 at 19:48:24 (UTC)

**Original** – View of Safdar Jung’s Tomb illuminated at night

Reason: featured unanimously on commons, is also an excellent image of the tomb’s view at night
Articles in which this image appears: Tomb of Safdar Jang
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
Creator: Arjunfotografer

Support as nominator – UnpetitproleX (talk) 19:48, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Daytime view is more encyclopaedic. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:31, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
There are about three dozen FPs of illuminated buildings at night, dawn, or dusk in the Architecture gallery. UnpetitproleX (talk) 06:01, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Agree with Charles. Nighttime reflective building images generally strike me as gimmicky. -- Sca (talk) 14:29, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Charlesjsharp, UnpetitproleX, and Sca: My thought is that they can make an otherwise kind of standard building look nicer, "edit out" ugly or distracting context, and draw eyes to the building. But the lead image of the article, while not perfect in any way, shows that there's a perfectly good background available during the day, indeed, a whole complex around it that appears to be a very intentional complex and thus encyclopedic. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.4% of all FPs.} 16:56, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Vinícius O. (talk) 04:03, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose – The blacks are too black and underexposed. Exposure bracketing or a brighter time in the evening would be a big improvement. Bammesk (talk) 15:46, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 21:32, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Redhead

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 24 May 2023 at 09:02:42 (UTC)

Reason: Was seen on Commons FPC four months ago, where it was featured unanimously.
Articles in which this image appears: Redhead (bird)
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
Creator: Rhododendrites

Support as nominator – MER-C 09:02, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Saschaporsche (talk) 15:49, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like the water droplets, and there's some fine detail. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.4% of all FPs.} 16:58, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 11:13, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Choliamb (talk) 11:47, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Redhead in Central Park (15503).jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 10:41, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Large yellow underwing caterpillar

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 24 May 2023 at 18:44:06 (UTC)

Reason: Was featured unanimously on Commons two years ago.
Articles in which this image appears: Large yellow underwing
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Insects
Creator: Ivar Leidus

Support as nominator – MER-C 18:44, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Some excellent detail. Great macro shot. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.4% of all FPs.} 17:00, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Bammesk (talk) 16:25, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 11:26, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Choliamb (talk) 11:47, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Noctua pronuba caterpillar - Keila.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 23:01, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

World Trade Center, New York.

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 26 May 2023 at 15:41:30 (UTC)

Reason: historic value, well balanced photograph, beautiful lighted, a joy to the eye
Articles in which this image appears: Ideogram (sculpture) World Trade Center (1973–2001)
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
Creator: Balthazar Korab

Support as nominator – Saschaporsche (talk) 15:41, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose for two reasons: lots of dust specks on the transparency, needs a cleanup; photo taken through a window or door, the frames spoil the picture. --Janke | Talk 19:59, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Fuzzy at full res. -- Sca (talk) 12:55, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
That's normal for film of the time. Have to take some account for photos that can't be retaken. I'm somewhat inclined to say it's a rather artistic framing. I'm leaning towards adding this to my queue, if there's a decent chance of it passing if I do. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.3% of all FPs. Currently celebrating his 600^th FP!} 18:20, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I think I'd support a restoration. The lighting makes it clear to me that that this framing was intended as artistic. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 21:35, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 18:40, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Rowland Buckstone and Cissy Grahame in the revival of F. C. Burnand's The Colonel

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 27 May 2023 at 18:17:41 (UTC)

**Original** – Rowland Buckstone and Cissy Grahame reprising their roles in the first revival of F.C. Burnand's *The Colonel*

Reason: These were the originators of the roles, so no real issues with it being a revival, and it's only about three years after the multi-year original run closed. Crop has been rightfully criticised at Commons FPC, but we can't go back and recrop it, and it does a good job at getting the feel of the play (a satire on æstheticism, much in the line of Gilbert and Sullivan's Patience which opened shortly thereafter.
Articles in which this image appears: The Colonel, it's likely to appear in Cissy Grahame once that article exists, which it should soon, because she's fascinating.
FP category for this image: WP:FP/THEATRE I'd say
Creator: London Stereoscopic Company, restored by Adam Cuerden

Support as nominator – Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.3% of all FPs. Currently celebrating his 600^th FP!} 18:17, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The probable reason for cropping the feet off was explained at Commons FP, but it is a poor composition with the crop. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:14, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It is passing on Commons despite that. I like enough about it, and think it's valuable enough as a historic document to forgive the feet, but - let's be clear now that I said my piece - it's a valid reason to oppose. I might say why I think it's good despite the flaws, I might try to explain them, but I do try to be open about known flaws in my summary, and leave it up to the voters how they weigh things. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.3% of all FPs. Currently celebrating his 600^th FP!} 14:34, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Crop is a small flaw, but I can accept it for a historic photograph. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 11:25, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Chris. IMO this is an easier pass at WP than at the Commons, because of the greater emphasis here on historical and encyclopedic value – Choliamb (talk) 12:02, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Choliamb: Well, it's passed there, but given Charles just had three excellent images fail for lack of quorum, I think we may have entered into a slow period on here again. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.4% of all FPs.} 00:11, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I'm going to leave FP for a while, it is a waste of time with so few voters. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:39, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support – per Chris and Choliamb. Bammesk (talk) 01:28, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 19:12, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Engaged

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 27 May 2023 at 20:48:33 (UTC)

Reason: While a later production, it does a good job at showing several scenes from the play, which helps put it in context.
Articles in which this image appears: Engaged (play), W. S. Gilbert +1
FP category for this image: WP:FP/THEATRE
Creator: H.A. Thomas Lith. Studio, restored by Adam Cuerden

Support as nominator – Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.3% of all FPs. Currently celebrating his 600^th FP!} 20:48, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Vinícius O. (talk) 18:17, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Snehrashmi (talk) 04:00, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – is there a scratch on the lower left? Bammesk (talk) 15:32, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Not after the new upload goes through. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.4% of all FPs.} 15:45, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 18:54, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Choliamb (talk) 12:57, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:W.S. Gilbert's burlesque comedy, Engaged.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 22:11, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bhadrakali, Basohli miniature

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 1 Jun 2023 at 17:05:59 (UTC)

**Original** – Pahari painting depicting the Trimurti worshipping Bhadrakali after she slays Mahishasura, Basohli, Jammu, c. 1660–1670 CE

Reason: Originally nominated in 2013, failed due to faulty EV resulting from improper placing and captioning; I've made changes which I believe improve the EV. FP on commons.
Articles in which this image appears: Bhadrakali
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Artwork/Paintings
Creator: unknown painter from Basohli, uploaded from Google Arts & Culture, edited by Redtigerxyz

Support as nominator – UnpetitproleX (talk) 17:05, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Bammesk (talk) 01:43, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It looks a bit blurry, and if I zoom to 200%, it's clear there's a ton of JPEG artifacting. It also has very different colours from the museum website, which also has this version which I honestly think is far better. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.4% of all FPs.} 02:27, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, the one you linked to is better. Bammesk (talk) 12:59, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I’m unable to open the link, but I’ll take your word for it. Therefore, withdrawing my nomination. UnpetitproleX (talk) 13:12, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Try clicking on the "Dezoomify !" button on the linked page. The color tone of the image in Adam's link is closer to the first upload of 16 February 2011. Bammesk (talk) 13:47, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 08:52, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn nomination. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 08:52, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Carmen Miranda

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 28 May 2023 at 18:17:50 (UTC)

Reason: A good quality 1940s picture
Articles in which this image appears: Carmen Miranda
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Entertainment
Creator: author unknown (20th Century Fox)

Support as nominator – Vinícius O. (talk) 18:17, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's a good photo, but it looks like the whites got blown out in the white balancing. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.4% of all FPs.} 17:20, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I took the liberty of rebalancing them. Support Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.4% of all FPs.} 19:42, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A brief thank you for the improvement you have made to the picture. Vinícius O. (talk) 20:16, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Vinícius94: Oh, glad to! It's minor, but a little better. I should warn you that, since it took a while for the rebalance and copyright check, there's a chance this may need renominated. And I should probably put the research below on the file page. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.4% of all FPs.} 06:36, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Right, I think so too. Vinícius O. (talk) 15:37, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Vinícius94: I've detailed all the research on the file page; does look like it'll need a renom since it took a bit to sort; I'd suggest waiting a bit (I'm going to give The Colonel a month, but there weren't active issues with that, just a slow period at FPC that meant it doesn't look like it'll reach quorum. They happen. This one, however, had some issues which are now sorted, so can probably be renommed a lot quicker.). Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.4% of all FPs.} 11:51, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Have we had a chance to see the front and back of the image to ascertain if a copyright notice was included? I'm not seeing it in the file history, and AFAIR Doctor Macro tends to only upload the image portion. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 11:24, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I mean, it's at the period where there'd presumably need to be a copyright renewal. Can we check for that? Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.4% of all FPs.} 20:20, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
That would be doable as well, though I'm not sure how it would appear in the catalogues if it was renewed. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 03:16, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Crisco 1942: Well, check my work: I've searched 1968 1969 and 1970 - both halves of the year are included in the Internet Archive uploads - and then re-searched for Havana https://archive.org/details/catalogofco1968322711libr/page/238/mode/2up?q=Havana] [2] [3]. I suppose we could check further, but I'm seeing no evidence of renewal. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.4% of all FPs.} 17:03, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Crisco 1492: I also checked 1941 - nothing relevant for Havana, and for a Miranda search, nothing relevant again. The film itself, for comparison, does show up in the appropriate section of Dramatic works/Motion Pictures: 1941 1969

Now, there's a possibility of bad OCR, but this seems reasonably convincing. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.4% of all FPs.} 17:14, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed. Now that that's out of the way, this is a very definite Support on my end. Glad to see some early colour images come through. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 21:31, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – suits the article well. Bammesk (talk) 12:47, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 18:20, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination didn’t reach the necessary quorum for promotion. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 18:20, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

LAPD Ford Crown Victoria Police Interceptor

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 28 May 2023 at 20:34:08 (UTC)

**Original** – A Ford Crown Victoria Police Interceptor used by the Los Angeles Police Department parked in Venice, Los Angeles on July 8, 2012. Two officers can be seen inside.

Reason: High resolution, clear, in public domain, used as the top image in police car to demonstrate a basic police sedan as is familiar to North Americans (not Americentrism, article has one police car from each continent in the lead), has an English description (just added one), seems slightly edited in terms of saturation and whatnot but doesn't overdo it.
Articles in which this image appears: Police car
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Vehicles/Land
Creator: Tomás Del Coro on Flickr; uploaded to Wikimedia Commons by Bayaindo

Support as nominator – AdoTang (talk) 20:34, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose – Nothing exceptional about the car or the comp. Scant EV. – Sca (talk) 12:52, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – too contrasty (overprocessed), darker details are washed out. Bammesk (talk) 15:55, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 23:11, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Captain Moonlite

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 30 May 2023 at 14:30:14 (UTC)

Reason: Fascinating character from Australian history. I believe this will be our first picture of a bushranger, and, unless I'm missing something, "outlaw" in general.
Articles in which this image appears: Captain Moonlite, bushranger, Charles Nettleton
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Others, unless we think criminals should go under Law ~~or Politics~~
Creator: Attributed to Charles Nettleton, restored by Adam Cuerden

Support as nominator – Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.4% of all FPs.} 14:30, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Bammesk (talk) 16:10, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 08:57, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 11:23, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Interesting guy; arresting portrait. I enjoyed the article. I assume this is one of those names that Australians know from the time they are toddlers, but most of the rest of us (by which of course I mean me) have never heard of. Choliamb (talk) 13:36, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Andrew George Scott, alias Captain Moonlite.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 18:43, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hotel Dolder Grand

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 31 May 2023 at 08:59:51 (UTC)

Reason: Was seen on Commons FPC three weeks ago, where it was featured unanimously.
Articles in which this image appears: Dolder Grand, Urs Schwarzenbach, List of hotels: Countries S
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
Creator: Roy Egloff

Support as nominator – MER-C 08:59, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Given the resolution output by the 5D Mark II, this looks like a stitch. Is it worth marking the file page for the potential digital manipulation? — Chris Woodrich (talk) 11:18, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Good winter evening comp, lighting. – Sca (talk) 12:52, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support UnpetitproleX (talk) 08:34, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – there are visible stitch boundaries near the right border, but not bad enough to oppose. It can be improved. Bammesk (talk) 01:24, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Snehrashmi (talk) 02:16, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - MA Javadi (talk) 07:43, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:CH.ZH.Zurich Hotel The-Dolder-Grand 3x2-R 15K.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 14:26, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Perugia Cathedral

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 31 May 2023 at 09:05:05 (UTC)

Reason: Was seen on Commons FPC this year, where it was featured unanimously.
Articles in which this image appears: Perugia Cathedral
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors
Creator: Diego Delso

Support as nominator – MER-C 09:05, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Looking at the pews, there appears to be some lens distortion. It's minimal, so I'm still going to support. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 11:14, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support A little noisy in the darkness, a slight distortion, but excellent overall. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adam Cuerden (talk • contribs) 02:18, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Bammesk (talk) 03:24, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
comment Either the Altar is not flat or this appears to be rotated slightly clockwise.©Geni (talk) 00:28, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Snehrashmi (talk) 16:33, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Catedral, Perugia, Italia, 2022-09-20, DD 42-44 HDR.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 14:31, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Senet

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 9 Jun 2023 at 19:14:02 (UTC)

Reason: Well-composed, good angle. High historic EV.
Articles in which this image appears: Senet, Art of ancient Egypt, Egyptian faience, etc.
FP category for this image: History/Others
Creator: Brooklyn Museum

Support as nominator – Brandmeister^talk 19:14, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Eh... It's pretty low resolution. Artifact's fascinating, but the dull gradiant background and the image being just 1,181 pixels high (and that with a decent amount of empty foreground) is hard to get past. It's also a little JPEG-artifacty if you zoom in a bit. I did some tests, and (given the generated file size) it looks like the quality was set in the 75-80% range, which is a bit low. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.4% of all FPs.} 20:48, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Adam. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 22:08, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Withdraw I must have been sleepy when picking... Brandmeister^talk 07:23, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  It would be great if the Brooklyn Museum could come up with a more high-res. pic. -- Sca (talk) 12:25, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 14:35, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn nomination. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 14:35, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.