Jump to content

Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 December 6

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

December 6

[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on December 6, 2024.

some regional honeys

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:07, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

locations and their relations with unmentioned in the target. note that the sentence case redirects were all unsourced stubs, with two of them having been created by the same (now blocked) user cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 14:18, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Thoughts on the page histories?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:35, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:43, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm... this is pretty complicated.
Delete Philippines Honey and Finland Honey for being redirects since 2005.
No comment on the rest, as they do appear to have history that isn't just a redirect Someone-123-321 (I contribute, Talk page so SineBot will shut up) 03:32, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

2026 ARCA Menards Series West

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:05, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No mention at the target, making this a misleading redirect. Delete as WP:TOOSOON. Hey man im josh (talk) 22:01, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

2026 ARCA Menards Series East

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:05, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No mention at the target, making this a misleading redirect. Delete as WP:TOOSOON. Hey man im josh (talk) 22:01, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Bengals

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. There's WP:SNOW outside and in here, too. (non-admin closure) Cremastra ‹ u — c › 20:48, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bengals, plural, usually refers to sports teams (which make up all the uses listed for "Bengals" on Bengal (disambiguation)). Among them, the Cincinnati Bengals are the clear primary topic, so I think it should be retargeted to Cincinnati Bengals. 🦬 Beefaloe 🦬 20:44, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

ROOT!

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Root! (Australian band). Complex/Rational 23:31, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

SEEMS TO REFER TO THE AUSTRALIAN BAND, BUT THE LACK OF A LOGO- ow my throat. the lack of a logo in the article might make it a little implausible, and there might be another use i'm missing. could just be retargeted (back?) to the band with no issue, but i'm 99% sure i'm missing at least every detail cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 20:09, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget to Root! (Australian band) as below. Why anyone looking for plant roots would search for "Root!", let alone "ROOT!" in all caps, is just beyond me. 🦬 Beefaloe 🦬 20:48, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I did some research, A) the band do have a logo B) the logo is indeed an all-uppercase "ROOT!" as the redirect implies so retarget to Root! (Australian band) Someone-123-321 (I contribute, Talk page so SineBot will shut up) 03:37, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Root!

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Reverted move. Undiscussed and clearly controversial move reverted. Anyone can start a proper RM if necessary. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 00:04, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

seems to refer to the australian band, to which it seems to be the primary topic. admittedly kind of iffy on doing anything here for reasons that boil down to a gut feeling that i'm missing something, so... leave as is, or consider proposing a move? cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 20:09, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also, the Australian band article was originally located at Root!, then suddenly (and less than a year ago) it was moved to Root! (Australian band) and Root! was retargeted to Root at the same time. This is an obvious retarget. 🦬 Beefaloe 🦬 20:56, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Revert I have never heard of this "Root!" myself, despite being Australian myself, but they don't seem to be particularly popular amongst WA'ers anyway Someone-123-321 (I contribute, Talk page so SineBot will shut up) 03:28, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Pterotype

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to John Pratt (inventor). ✗plicit 00:05, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

gonna make the frankly kind of dumb suggestion of returning to red. the pterotype, built by a guy named john twice, is known for being part of the reason christopher latham sholes created this obscure doodad known as the "qwerty keyboard". thus, i think there's a non-zero chance that it might be kinda notable. if not that, i guess retargeting to #inventing the typewriter on chris's article would also work cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 17:10, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Ella, maldita alma (Tv Series)

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 December 19#Ella, maldita alma (Tv Series)

Orduspor 1967

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:07, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Should be deleted as Orduspor 1967 is a legally unaffiliated phoenix club of Orduspor. Should be a red link. – anlztrk (talk | contribs) 11:28, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Great appendage

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) Cremastra ‹ u — c › 13:28, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Megacheirans aren’t the only things with great appendages, so why does this even redirect here. IC1101-Capinatator (talk) 09:31, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete A whole load of other things have "great appendages", the most obvious one being male humans (not even kidding - some people have jokingly referred to their "thing" as an appendage) Someone-123-321 (I contribute, Talk page so SineBot will shut up) 09:35, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Don't delete I merged content from this article into Megacheira (which the contents of the article were specifically about), so it's necessary to keep the history some capacity to retain attribution. Looking at the term "great appendage" on scholar [1], the term is basically exclusively used for fossil arthropods, and particularly for megacheirans. I wouldn't oppose changing the target to arthropod, but I would oppose deleting outright. Hemiauchenia (talk) 14:38, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per Hemiauchenia. This is a (reasonably) well-known paleontology term, and the current target is where our material on it exists. Tevildo (talk) 16:33, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, as noted this is not a "generic term" as intimated, but a specific anatomical term used in paleontology for Megacheira#Morphology arthropods. If there is notable usage for non-arthropods, please show it--Kevmin § 21:10, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I have jokingly seen men refer to their thing as a "appendage", however A) no RS seems to back this up and B) I couldn't find anything on "great appendage" Someone-123-321 (I contribute, Talk page so SineBot will shut up) 03:26, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas characters

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas#Story and characters. Jay 💬 11:03, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A) No such list of Characters exist anywhere on the target B) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2024_September_19#List_of_Grand_Theft_Auto:_San_Andreas_characters - a similar redirect - was closed as Delete Someone-123-321 (I contribute, Talk page so SineBot will shut up) 09:25, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Hawaiian style

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Disambiguate * Pppery * it has begun... 21:30, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

was about to retarget to hawaiian pizza, but i realized that there are at least two other things that can be considered "hawaiian style". maybe even more! also see the history. it's not important to this discussion, but it is really funny cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 14:16, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep as redirect to pizza, although redirecting to Hawaiian pizza is worth a thought (the only difference is the pineapple, which I don't think is considered Canadian as much as a universal ingredient). It's lucky that at least two fruits, pineapples and tomatoes, go well on pizzas (are any other fruits commonly used as a pizza topping?). As for your alternates, don't try it on a surfboard. Randy Kryn (talk) 14:46, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    i was actually thinking of acoustic guitars and shaved ice, two things widely known for being closely related[citation needed] cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 15:03, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
see also hawaii-style pizza and hawaiian-style pizza, which do redirect to hawaiian pizza, but make sure to specify that it's about pizza cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 15:01, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Disambig as multiple topics of prominence: "uh-huhuhehuhuhuhg, yeah, Beavis, we'll take it Hawaiian style, ugh-huhuhughuhug." On another note, after I get done with the page I've G-nom'd, I think I've got a new article idea... BarntToust 21:51, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Aydoh8[contribs] 06:22, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguate between Hawaiian pizza, aloha shirt / hawaiian-style shirt, Hawaiian cuisine, the inevitable BABH reference just in case and probably some others I'm missing as well Someone-123-321 (I contribute, Talk page so SineBot will shut up) 09:11, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
problem: hawaiian pizza still has nothing to do with hawaii or styles cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 13:44, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hawaiian pizza is regularly and commonly called Hawaiian style pizza., even though (as I was shocked to learn) it is Canadian in origin. Fieari (talk) 23:12, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Chowda

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) Cremastra ‹ u — c › 13:29, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

it cannot be understated how hard i laughed seeing this, my entire head hurts. created as a phonetic spelling of the boston accent, though results are torn between some english product (or is it a brand?), some unnotable musician, and the character from the tv series, and i still doubt a case like this would be worth keeping. created by a user who was blocked for "ridiculous redirects", so there's that too cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 20:15, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep as it's a legitimate, though informal, regional term, but maybe change the target article to clam chowder. ~~ Jessintime (talk) 20:20, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to The Boy Who Knew Too Much (The Simpsons)#Plot, a pretty well known gag from the series, probably what inspired the redirect. Although not explicitly spelled as "chowda" in the article, it is mentioned "with a Boston accent", which is how that would typically be done. 35.139.154.158 (talk) 20:24, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to The Boy Who Knew Too Much (The Simpsons)#Plot, per the IP above. BarntToust 21:43, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, or as suggested by Jessintime retarget to clam chowder. Very surprised by the suggestions to link to an episode of The Simpsons. A quick search on Google Books shows quite a few hits for chowda, and when excluding its use as a name it is almost always in lieu of chowder: [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11]... Shazback (talk) 16:21, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    It's a cutesy spelling used in products and recipe names, or in dialog-written-with-accent to evoke the New England accent, to which clam chowder is closely associated. This could be done for any word ending in -er, but we don't do that, because it would be silly to do so. On the other hand, we do have some material that talks about this very particular use of the accented word, as an actual plot point in something. I think the retarget to the Simpsons episode is by far the better option. Barring that, deletion would be my next choice. 35.139.154.158 (talk) 17:53, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to Clam chowder or Keep, slight preference for retargeting. This is a very commonly used eye dialect spelling of a word with affinity for the subject. WP:RFOR applies with only a minor stretch to apply it to a relevant accent as opposed to a completely separate language-- clam chowder is in fact strongly associated with Boston, as the article text confirms. The association is strong enough I'm debating whether the clam chowder article actually should mention this eye dialect spelling... I have few doubts that a reference for it could be found. Is it WP:DUE? Maybe... maybe. But certainly there's enough to have a redirect at the very least. Fieari (talk) 23:39, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. For the record, I strongly oppose a retarget to Clam chowder per WP:RASTONISH. And to address the point above, eye dialect redirects should generally be avoided; very often, they cover up more specific content that a search might reveal. But in this case, we actually have something appropriate to redirect to. If someone wants to look up information about chowder, they're just going to search for "chowder". On the other hand, if someone wants to look up information about the gag from the Simpsons episode, this is a wayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy more useful search term if you don't know what episode it's from. Reward the searchers looking for specific information using a plausible search term. Punish those using a misspelling. However, in this case, it's a very mild punishment, since upon reading the linked-to section, even if someone didn't know what it was, they'd realize what it was. You could even put in a hatnote if you really wanted (although I think that would be a little overkill). 35.139.154.158 (talk) 03:38, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    My view is that WP:RASTONISH would on the contrary lead to opposing a redirect to a specific gag in one episode of The Simpsons. Wikipedia aims to have a broad readership, and there are many, many more cases of chowda being used to refer to chowder (see above, also in brand names or 'routine' mentions in travel guides, recipe names etc. in print or online). Saying that the reader can just infer from the plot summary of the article that chowda is chowder with a Boston accent does not sit well with me, and quite frankly if I searched something I saw in a cookbook or travel guide on wikipedia and were redirected in such a manner I would be WP:RASTONISHED. Shazback (talk) 20:20, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep as is, retargeting to clam chowder or a TV gag is too specific. -- Tavix (talk) 16:20, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
what even makes clam chowder a possible target here, especially more fitting than chowder? honestly, i'm also against keeping at this point because, simply put, we're not a boston-centered wiki (at least not yet, just you wait...) cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 10:53, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nearly every hit on a quick google search for "chowda" relates to clam chowder, not the generic chowder. ~~ Jessintime (talk) 14:42, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
nearly all of the clam chowder-related results i could find seem to refer to "clam chowda" (notice the specific use of the word "clam"), a product of a not very notable brand named "boston chowda". the only others are products from even less notable brands or miscellaneous restaurants. does google think i'm a tourist? cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 16:33, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Aydoh8[contribs] 06:22, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Tom Yum Goong

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Tom-Yum-Goong. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 10:03, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Originally created in 2005 as a redirect to the film Tom-Yum-Goong, but was retargeted to Tom yum (the dish the film is named after) by WhisperToMe in 2009. I think the capitalised form, with this specific spelling, may be more likely to be typed by those looking for the film. Paul_012 (talk) 05:50, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget back to the film Someone-123-321 (I contribute, Talk page so SineBot will shut up) 06:15, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Tom-yum-goong

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Tom-Yum-Goong. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 10:01, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Originally created in 2005 as a redirect to the film Tom-Yum-Goong, but was retargeted to Tom yum (the dish the film is named after) by User:WhisperToMe in 2009. I think this specific spelling and hyphenation is more likely to be typed by those looking for the film. Paul_012 (talk) 05:44, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget back to the film Someone-123-321 (I contribute, Talk page so SineBot will shut up) 06:15, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Flammeo

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 10:01, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at target, though it is mentioned at Neoniphon argenteus. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 05:01, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per @Paul 012's edit. 𝔅𝔦𝔰-𝔖𝔢𝔯𝔧𝔢𝔱𝔞? 18:08, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
For the record, the edit was performed by The Chameleons, not me. --Paul_012 (talk) 03:04, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Nazi persecution of Jews

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to History of the Jews in Germany#Under the Nazis (1933–45). Kept current target but refined to correct section. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 09:59, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Persecution of Jews § Nazi Germany might be a better target. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 19:39, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 04:50, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep but refine section as per Ivanvector. That target has much more info than Persecution of Jews#Nazi Germany, so it's more useful to readers. 🦬 Beefaloe 🦬 20:51, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
"Retarget" per Ivanvector to History of the Jews in Germany#Under the Nazis (1933–45). Do agree that the original target has more information, best to target it to the proper section though. VolatileAnomaly (talk) 04:02, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

TikTok Rizz Party

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 December 18#TikTok Rizz Party

Quandale Dingle

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. Jay 💬 10:46, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at the current target. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 04:32, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as @Jolielover added content to the article mentioning it and it most likely won't be turned into its own article in the future. 𝔅𝔦𝔰-𝔖𝔢𝔯𝔧𝔢𝔱𝔞? 18:02, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The Sandbox (2021 video game)

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. No one understood why the nom brought this redirect to RfD, and they didn't make any further suggestions either. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 10:12, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I created this redirect, though it is essentially a recreation of a page that has been previously delete The Sandbox (blockchain platform) QuantumFoam66 (talk) 04:20, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete per WP:G7 (author requests deletion) Someone-123-321 (I contribute, Talk page so SineBot will shut up) 06:20, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep just because a redirect's subject matter is essentially the same as a deleted page, doesn't mean it can be deleted. A redirect doesn't have the same deletion criteria as articles. And The Sandbox (company) does indeed mention the presence of a 2021 video game titled The Sandbox. QuantumFoam66 (talk) 17:41, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
User:QuantumFoam66, you're not making yourself understandable. What is the reason you opened this discussion? --Paul_012 (talk) 07:29, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No, G7 still applies though as you specifically nominated a redirect to be deleted User:Someone-123-321 (I contribute, Talk page so SineBot will shut up) 05:45, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Someone-123-321, please use common sense. G7 is dependent on the author's request for deletion, so if the author revokes or contradicts their own request, the G7 must instantly become invalid. --Paul_012 (talk) 05:54, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oh. Yeah, I did not know that. Thanks for the correction though User:Someone-123-321 (I contribute, Talk page so SineBot will shut up) 05:58, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment QuantumFoam66, as mentioned by another user, it is unclear why you brought this redirect to RfD. Based on your reply it seems that you want to keep the redirect, in which case you didn't have to create the RfD entry in the first place. Are there any questions or concerns you are wishing to address? Do you feel that this redirect may be better targeting someplace else? If not, we can just close this as a speedy keep and move on. VolatileAnomaly (talk) 03:45, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Trump John, Donald

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 09:54, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lastname Middlename, Firstname is an extremely uncommon way of writing names. QuicoleJR (talk) 01:53, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2024_December_6&oldid=1265230111"
pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy