Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Egypt/Assessment

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Article AlertsCollaborationTalkArticle requestsMembersTasksPhoto requestsTemplatesAssessment

Welcome to the assessment department of the Egypt WikiProject! This department focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia's Egypt related articles. While much of the work is done in conjunction with the WP:1.0 program, the article ratings are also used within the project itself to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work.

The ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{WikiProject Egypt}} project banner; this causes the articles to be placed into the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Egypt articles by quality and Category:Egypt articles by importance, which serve as the foundations for an automatically generated worklist.

Frequently asked questions

[edit]
How can I get my article rated?
Please list it in the requesting an assessment section below.
Who can assess articles?
Any member of the Egypt WikiProject is free to add or change the rating of an article.
Why didn't the reviewer leave any comments?
Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, we are unable to leave detailed comments in most cases. If you have particular questions, you might ask the person who assessed the article; they will usually be happy to provide you with their reasoning.
What if I don't agree with a rating?
You can list it in the requesting an assessment section below, and someone will take a look at it. Alternately, you can ask any member of the project to rate the article again.
Aren't the ratings subjective?
Yes, they are, but it's the best system we've been able to devise; if you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!

If you have any other questions not listed here, please feel free to ask them on the discussion page for this department.

Instructions

[edit]

Quality assessment

[edit]

An article's quality assessment is generated from the class parameter in the {{WikiProject Banner Shell}}. Articles that have the {{WikiProject Egypt}} project banner on their talk page will be added to the appropriate categories by quality.

The following values may be used for the class parameter to describe the quality of the article (see Wikipedia:Content assessment for assessment criteria):

FA (for featured articles only; adds articles to Category:FA-Class Egypt articles)  FA
A (adds articles to Category:A-Class Egypt articles)  A
GA (for good articles only; adds articles to Category:GA-Class Egypt articles)  GA
B (adds articles to Category:B-Class Egypt articles) B
C (adds articles to Category:C-Class Egypt articles) C
Start (adds articles to Category:Start-Class Egypt articles) Start
Stub (adds articles to Category:Stub-Class Egypt articles) Stub
FL (for featured lists only; adds articles to Category:FL-Class Egypt articles)  FL
List (adds articles to Category:List-Class Egypt articles) List

For non-standard grades and non-mainspace content, the following values may be used for the class parameter:

Category (for categories; adds pages to Category:Category-Class Egypt pages) Category
Disambig (for disambiguation pages; adds pages to Category:Disambig-Class Egypt pages) Disambig
Draft (for drafts; adds pages to Category:Draft-Class Egypt pages) Draft
File (for files and timed text; adds pages to Category:File-Class Egypt pages) File
Portal (for portal pages; adds pages to Category:Portal-Class Egypt pages) Portal
Project (for project pages; adds pages to Category:Project-Class Egypt pages) Project
Redirect (for redirect pages; adds pages to Category:Redirect-Class Egypt pages) Redirect
Template (for templates and modules; adds pages to Category:Template-Class Egypt pages) Template
NA (for any other pages where assessment is unnecessary; adds pages to Category:NA-Class Egypt pages) NA
??? (articles for which a valid class has not yet been provided are listed in Category:Unassessed Egypt articles) ???

Quality scale

[edit]

Importance assessment

[edit]

An article's importance assessment is generated from the importance parameter in the {{WikiProject Egypt}} project banner on its talk page:

{{WikiProject Egypt|importance=???}}

The following values may be used for the importance parameter to describe the relative importance of the article within the project (see Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Priority of topic for assessment criteria):

Top (adds articles to Category:Top-importance Egypt articles)  Top 
High (adds articles to Category:High-importance Egypt articles)  High 
Mid (adds articles to Category:Mid-importance Egypt articles)  Mid 
Low (adds articles to Category:Low-importance Egypt articles)  Low 
NA (adds articles to Category:NA-importance Egypt articles)  NA 
??? (articles for which a valid importance rating has not yet been provided are listed in Category:Unknown-importance Egypt articles)  ??? 

Importance scale

[edit]
Label Criteria Reader's experience Editor's experience Example
Top The article is one of the core topics about Egypt. Generally, this is limited to those articles that are included as sections of the main Egypt article. A reader who is not involved in the Egypt field will have high familiarity with the subject matter and should be able to relate to the topic easily. Articles in this importance range are written in mostly generic terms, leaving technical terms and descriptions for more specialized pages. Economy of Egypt
High The article covers a topic that is vital to understanding Egypt. 2011 Egyptian revolution
Mid The article covers a topic that has a strong but not vital role in the history of Egypt. Many readers will be familiar with the topic being discussed, but a larger majority of readers may have only cursory knowledge of the overall subject. Articles at this level will cover subjects that are well known but not necessarily vital to understand Egypt. Due to the topics covered at this level, Mid-importance articles will generally have more technical terms used in the article text. Most people involved in the history of Egypt will be rated in this level. Falafel
Low The article is not required knowledge for a broad understanding of Egypt. Few readers outside the Egypt field or that are not Egypt students may be familiar with the subject matter. It is likely that the reader does not know anything at all about the subject before reading the article. Articles at this range of importance will often delve into the minutiae of the Egypt, using technical terms (and defining them) as needed. Topics included at this level include most infrastructure of Egypt. Alexandria Zoo

Requesting an assessment

[edit]

If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to list it below.

Assess Talent Management - Egypt's No. 1 Personality Assessment, Ability Assessment and Psychometric Testing Software Company and the smartest choice for HR and OD Managers in the Middle East.

I have rewritten most of the article. Nominating it for Good Article status. Zakawer (talk) 12:02, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The entire article was rewritten. The speechmark is also correctly used.It deserves reassessment. Many thanks.

I have developed this article from a stub and added new refrences. I think it deserves reassessment. Thank you.

Wrote the article from scratch. Isn't much though. More is in the citations. Assess. Contribute. Thanks. :-)

I significantly expanded this article from a stub. Please reassess. It needs more Arabic sources. Thanks.

I have developed this article from a stub with new references. Please assess it, thank you Rmeares01 (talk) 00:18, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Education in Egypt and reform by community leaders and educators. I have added external links and reference as evidence of notability ..Please note the corruption in the past regime that was suppressing reform attempts specially by community leaders and scarcity of information and research on the topic.. please check.. thank you

Please lock at this article and give it a rats , i have created it fast so i dont know if it is good or not.

I have developed this article from a small stub. I think it deserves a new assessment. Thank you. The Egyptian Liberal (talk) 07:07, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please lock at this article and give it a rats , i have created it fast so i dont know if it is good or not.

Please lock at this article and give it a rats , i have created it fast so i dont know if it is good or not.

Please lock at this article and give it a rats , i have created it fast so i dont know if it is good or not.

Please lock at this article and give it a rats , i have created it fast so i dont know if it is good or not.

Please lock at this article and give it a rats , i have created it fast so i dont know if it is good or not.

Hi. Please take a look at my article "niqab in Egypt" I have made a lot of changes and it is nominated for good article status and would love your feedback. Noosaelgamoosa (talk) 05:10, 24 November 2010 (UTC)noosaelgamoosa[reply]

I have developed this article from a small stub. I think it deserves a new assessment. Thank you. MontyofEgypt 18:55, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have developed this article from a small stub. I think it deserves a new assessment. Thank you. The Egyptian Liberal (talk) 07:07, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have developed this article from a small stub. I think it deserves a new assessment. Thank you. The Egyptian Liberal (talk) 07:07, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have developed this article from a small stub. I think it deserves a new assessment. Thank you. The Egyptian Liberal (talk) 07:07, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have expanded a small, stub article into a longer one. DCI2026 (talk) 19:04, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Operation Badr (1973) - complete re-write of the article after moving it (previously called: The Crossing); you can see the difference between the present article and the old one here. With a proper ending I think this article can reach GA-class. Sherif9282 (talk) 18:27, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by --Diaa abdelmoneim (talk) 10:28, 23 April 2009 (UTC) Generally our assessment is for a maximum of B-class. Please do a peer review before nominating for GA[reply]

You have multiple grammar and spelling problems:
  • In general numbers from one to ten should be spelled out. This can be seen in "October 7" and other such spellings
Plot:
  • "Operation Badr was the code name for the Egyptian military operation (October 6, 1973) to cross the Suez Canal and seize the Bar-Lev Line at the start of the Yom Kippur War." should be "Operation Badr was the code name for the Egyptian military operation to cross the Suez Canal and seize the Bar-Lev Line on October 6, 1973 starting the Yom Kippur War."
  • "It is also known in as The Crossing (العبور)" should be "It is also known in Egypt as The Crossing (العبور)"
  • "Combat engineers constructed bridges and this allowed reinforcements to cross." should be "Combat engineers constructed bridges, which allowed reinforcements to cross."
Prologue:
  • A map of the occupied territory after the six day war would be useful
Strategies for War
  • "Egypt rejected the plan because Israeli forces the war would be carried out essentially on one front" between "forces" and "war" there is something missing
Please read through the article one more time to check for other grammar errors. You could use http://www.spellchecker.net/spellcheck/ which sometimes is right and sometimes wrong.
References:
  • References like "A Critical Review of the 1973 Arab-Israeli War" and "AT-3 SAGGER Anti-Tank Guided Missile" should all have publisher, date, author and accessdate
  • Use {{cite web}} when citing a website with the paramters |publisher= |date= |accessdate= and |author= filled in. Read the documentation of the template to understand this more.
External links
  • Please add some general information external links to read about the event.

Ask for a peer review at Wikipedia:Peer review to get a review of more then one user.

Done most of your recommendations (but I will keep the dates as they are). I will add external links soon. What do you think now? Sherif9282 (talk) 18:26, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done. I corrected a few refs that I spotted myself. I don't suppose there are any more mistakes. Note: I assumed it was Cairo Local Time (since Shazly and Gamasy give the time, and they are Egyptians), but I will check it soon. Anything else with the article? --Sherif9282 (talk) 21:02, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tamara Siuda -- Significant changes have been made in the past month or so, including layout, content, and the addition of a variety of references. Was rated "Start", I believe now to be "GA". IanCheesman (talk) 20:31, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  1. You need to add citation templates {{cite web}} and there are some missing citations.
  2. Expansion of the article is necessary.
  3. Lead is too short.
  4. Your prose is great.Green tickY
  5. The artice needs an {{Infobox Biography}} and a picture
  6. It's still short but techincals are ok. Green tickY

--Diaa abdelmoneim (talk) 08:43, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kemetic Orthodoxy -- Complete re-write took place over the past few months, including layout, content, and references. Article is now more than four times the original size, and layout is largely based on that of other religion pages. Was rated "Start", I believe now to be "GA". IanCheesman (talk) 20:31, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's better but:

  1. You need to add citation templates {{cite web}} and there are some missing citations
  2. The article is resourcefulGreen tickY
  3. Lead is too short.
  4. Your prose is great.Green tickY
  5. The artice needs an {{Infobox Biography}} and more pictures
  6. Green tickY

--Diaa abdelmoneim (talk) 08:43, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Popular pages: A bot-generated list of pageviews, useful for focused cleanup of frequently viewed articles.

Assessment log

[edit]
Egypt articles:
Index · Statistics · Log
The logs in this section are generated automatically (on a daily basis); please don't add entries to them by hand.


December 29, 2024

[edit]

Renamed

[edit]

Reassessed

[edit]

Assessed

[edit]

Removed

[edit]


pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy