Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Mathematics/Archive/2023/Sep
COI edit request at Probability box
[edit]A COI editor has made a request for information to be added to the Applications section of this article. The requesting editor appears to be the author of the reference they are hoping to apply to the requested addition to that section. Unfortunately, Space Trajectory Optimization Asteroid Impact Monitoring State Estimation is not independently notable (nor for that matter, are many other items in the Applications section). Thus, I was hoping someone more mathematically inclined could have a look? Thank you very much for any help on this. Regards, Spintendo 01:01, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
- Wikipedia:WikiProject_Statistics may be a better fit for your query. PatrickR2 (talk) 00:20, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
Thank you Spintendo 19:59, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
Craig S. Kaplan
[edit]Editors are concerned about a notability tag and there is a report at ANI. The report is rather premature as there do not appear to be any comments that would generally be considered unacceptable. Please join in at Talk:Craig S. Kaplan (the ANI report won't go anywhere). If participants here consider the subject to be notable (it looks that way to me), please remove the tag and tell anyone wanting to restore it to take the article to WP:AFD. Johnuniq (talk) 03:31, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
Edit war and content dispute at Interval (mathematics)
[edit]Third-party opinion would be welcome at Talk:Interval (mathematics)#New edits by 慈居. D.Lazard (talk) 09:50, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
This is a long, text-book-like draft at AfC. We are having problems finding a knowledgeable editor to help the editor, Johsebb, get it into acceptable form. Help would be appreciated. StarryGrandma (talk) 16:37, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
q-pseudoconvex, q-pseudoconcave, q-complete
[edit]I am adding references to the Andreotti–Grauert theorem and I am wondering where to explain the notions called q-pseudoconvex, q-pseudoconcave, q-complete. Since these notions were introduced by Andreotti-Grauert (1962), one way is to explain them in the Andreotti-Grauert theorem. In that case, it might be better to change the title of the article to Andreotti–Grauert theory, but it seems like the lead sentence needs to be rewritten. Also, I have no ideas for the lead sentence about Andreotti–Grauert theory. Another way is to explain q-pseudoconvex with pseudoconvexity and q-complete with Stein manifold, but I don't know where to explain q-pseudoconcave. SilverMatsu (talk) 08:26, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Simplification
[edit]Can anyone check my working at Talk:Alignments_of_random_points#Simplification, please? Perhaps I'm being obtuse, but surely the second, simplified form is a correct simplification of the first; if so, what mystifies me is why the original source wrote in it the original form. — The Anome (talk) 10:57, 30 September 2023 (UTC)