Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 75.03%. Comparing base (fc07cd8) to head (5ee0315).

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##             master    #6427   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     75.03%   75.03%           
  Complexity     5540     5540           
=========================================
  Files           686      686           
  Lines         19214    19214           
  Branches       3708     3708           
=========================================
  Hits          14418    14418           
  Misses         4241     4241           
  Partials        555      555           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Hi maintainers just wanted to check in! Would love if someone could review this minor README enhancement whenever they get a chance. Thank you so much.

I don't know if this is necessary... what do you think @alxkm ?

@DenizAltunkapan, I agree with you. This kind of information is easy to find online, and anyone interested in contributing should already be familiar with the language and its ecosystem. That’s why I believe the additional documentation is a bit redundant.

@DishaA06 that said, feel free to explore other ways to contribute - there are definitely areas in the codebase that could benefit from improvements. Thanks again for the PR and your interest in the project.

@DenizAltunkapan, I agree with you. This kind of information is easy to find online, and anyone interested in contributing should already be familiar with the language and its ecosystem. That’s why I believe the additional documentation is a bit redundant.

@DishaA06 that said, feel free to explore other ways to contribute - there are definitely areas in the codebase that could benefit from improvements. Thanks again for the PR and your interest in the project.

Sure
Anything I can help with??

@DenizAltunkapan, I agree with you. This kind of information is easy to find online, and anyone interested in contributing should already be familiar with the language and its ecosystem. That’s why I believe the additional documentation is a bit redundant.
@DishaA06 that said, feel free to explore other ways to contribute - there are definitely areas in the codebase that could benefit from improvements. Thanks again for the PR and your interest in the project.

Sure Anything I can help with??

@DishaA06 add some additional testcases, find a new algorithm that isnt in the repo yet or solve some issues ; )