Skip to content

#6336/enhancement/Refactor: Standardize comparison logic using SortUtils #6442

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

dinishajais
Copy link
Contributor

Enhancement #6336

I have refactored and replaced all the compareTo with SortUtil functions. The places where equality is checked or where the code uses the values given by the compareTo() , has not been replaced.

Three files have no changes and the reason is mentioned below:

StrandSort : In this java class the methods in which compareTo is used has <T extends Comparable<? super T>> as the return type. Since the SortUtils functions are declared with , which contradicts. Thus SortUtils functions cannot be used here in this class in any method.
FlashSort : same reason as StrandSort
WiggleSort: This class either has equality or it uses the numerical value given by the compareTo().
Thus apart from above three classes all other classes have been refcatored.

👍 I have read CONTRIBUTING.md.
👍 This pull request is all my own work -- I have not plagiarized it.
👍 All filenames are in PascalCase.
👍 All functions and variable names follow Java naming conventions.
👍 All new algorithms have a URL in their comments that points to Wikipedia or other similar explanations.
👍 All new code is formatted with clang-format -i --style=file path/to/your/file.java

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Jul 24, 2025

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 89.47368% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 75.04%. Comparing base (2eb80fb) to head (b596020).

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...ava/com/thealgorithms/sorts/IntrospectiveSort.java 50.00% 2 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##             master    #6442   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     75.04%   75.04%           
+ Complexity     5535     5534    -1     
=========================================
  Files           685      685           
  Lines         19208    19208           
  Branches       3706     3706           
=========================================
  Hits          14414    14414           
  Misses         4240     4240           
  Partials        554      554           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@dinishajais dinishajais reopened this Jul 24, 2025
@DenizAltunkapan DenizAltunkapan enabled auto-merge (squash) July 26, 2025 08:36
@DenizAltunkapan DenizAltunkapan merged commit a8b579e into TheAlgorithms:master Jul 26, 2025
6 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants
pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy